Wireless Networks Thread, Slow login when a whole class logs in over wifi in Technical; Originally Posted by SYNACK
Um, I'm pretty certain that unless your waps has a stack of radios (xirrus) you are ...
21st October 2013, 02:36 PM #16
I know about the differences between G and N, but I can see why you thought that way
Originally Posted by SYNACK
That's interesting however that AC APs come with two gigabit ports. I still think it'll only be a matter of time before someone works out how to get 10Gbps over CAT5e, working to 100m.
21st October 2013, 02:42 PM #17
Remember that 300 Mbps is only the maximum data rate available in 5 GHz with 2 spatial streams with a 40MHz channel and short guard interval.
WLAN devices are only required to support up to MCS 7, so in 2.4 GHz that's a maximum data rate of 72 Mbps. With no frame aggregation, the maximum throughput you will get is 57 Mbps, and this needs to be shared between ALL devices. This is a theoretical maximum, once you factor in multiple devices the true throughput drops.
1 AP with 5 clients all modulating at MCS7 in 2.4 GHz gives a throughput of around 40 Mbps, about 6.7 per device.
1 AP with 10 clients, all at MCS 7 will get about 3 .7 Mbps per device.
And, this is with everyone modulating at the highest rate available, if stations have to rate shift down, then the picture gets worse.
There are tools to analyze this, when you plan your network before deployment these are all the sorts of scenarios you need to consider.
Last edited by neilmac; 21st October 2013 at 02:47 PM.
21st October 2013, 08:20 PM #18
The 300Mbps figures given for N wifi reminds me of the "up to" figures on ADSL lines.
It seems I have found the source of the problem rather more easily than I feared. Symantec Endpoint appears to be downloading 300MB of updates on each client, every time each one turns on, at least if it has not been turned on today already. So it is not really surprising connection speeds grinds to a halt. After waiting half an hour for Symantec to sort itself out, the laptops take about 40 seconds to turn on and another 40 to log in - not great, but acceptable.
Now to work out how to get Symantec to behave! I think I might have to get the laptops to turn on each night to update or something.
Thanks to Jollity from:
psydii (22nd October 2013)
21st October 2013, 08:49 PM #19
And we conclude, the wifi was behaving as it was designed to ....
Great you got it worked out.
21st October 2013, 09:02 PM #20
Originally Posted by neilmac
Well I gained some useful insights on WiFi issues for the future.
21st October 2013, 09:22 PM #21
The only way I've found to get Symantec to behave is to uninstall it. Good luck!
Originally Posted by Jollity
Thanks to seawolf from:
Jollity (22nd October 2013)
21st October 2013, 11:04 PM #22
Synack hit the point. Many wifi companies and brands are awesome for single user through to 10 user wifi but add more in or larger profiles etc things will suck. Ruckus has stepped forward on this and can be used to handle a large amount of users (provided profiles are reasonably small...ie arpund the 3mb mark).
Other brands of wifi (xirrus, aruba, meraki) are also stepping up now and I would be willing to bet that out of all, xirrus would be the next brand that says yes, one AP can service X range, with Y many users, and do it well.
In all my final advice is this...test every brand thoroughly. Have a class willing to help out. Install each brand individually, test the log ins and speeds of 30 machines at once...then rinse and repeat. Also another thing to factor...thickness of walls between AP and machine, any wire msh in the walls, other RF antenna causing havok or all APs on the same chanmel for example etc. Factor in everything and move forward.
22nd October 2013, 12:15 AM #23
Only 1 device can talk at once, so if your design is going to be critical you need to work from the very beginning with a good understanding of how WiFi works. The differences between vendors are not so great unless you know how to configure it to get the extra benefits.
Manufacturers will give figures but you have to understand how AP loading works, plus how to make extra gains with QoS, balancing, toggling data rates and other tweaks that will change the environment.
10 internet users will behave vastly different to 10 VoIP phones, simply adding more access points does not increase performance and can often make things worse. It's never about how many devices per access point.
You have to start with the client devices and work up from there. Complex network design needs a skilled professional, if you try and do it cheaply and with minimal skills then you design faults into the network that will be difficult to put right later. You should thoroughly analyse your client devices and their needs, this will tell you how many access points you have to install, then you have to try and balance the signals.
Vendor selection is about in the middle on a task list of things to do when planning a network.
Really, if it's an important network that will be used for more than just casual browsing, you need to plan correctly, and get professional help.
By aaqib in forum Home Access Plus+
Last Post: 15th May 2012, 04:55 PM
By jenking in forum Windows 7
Last Post: 16th January 2012, 03:16 AM
By Davit2005 in forum General Chat
Last Post: 10th October 2011, 05:36 PM
Last Post: 3rd November 2010, 02:42 PM
Last Post: 30th November 2006, 06:57 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)