Wireless Networks Thread, Procurve 2600 series and 2510 series in Technical; I was flicking through a network product catalogue today (as you do) and I came to the hp section (we ...
-
4th September 2007, 10:32 AM #1 Procurve 2600 series and 2510 series
I was flicking through a network product catalogue today (as you do) and I came to the hp section (we use hp almost exclusively for network infrastructure here) and I saw the 2510 series and no mention of the 2600 series. I did a quick comparison on the hp website and I can't see much difference between the 2 except one is half the weight and fanless!
Anyone know if the 2510 series is inferior to the 2600 series (apart from only having a 24 port model). I can't see anything missing that I normally use, vlans, radius mac auth, probably other bits.
If 2510 is pretty much the same it could solve a problem for me where in the past someone stupidly wired about 24 points into the top of someones office and they won't have a noisy switch in there
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
4th September 2007, 10:45 AM #2 Re: Procurve 2600 series and 2510 series
2510 has:
- No Fan, making it run hotter (it's a smaller case too).
- Higher switching latency, making it slower
- Lower switching capacity and backplane bandwidth, making it even slower
What's the price difference between a 2626 and a 2510?
-
-
4th September 2007, 10:56 AM #3 Re: Procurve 2600 series and 2510 series
Price difference is very little. I have also found out it doesn't do mac based radius auth
-
-
4th September 2007, 11:05 AM #4 Re: Procurve 2600 series and 2510 series
-
-
6th September 2007, 10:17 AM #5 Re: Procurve 2600 series and 2510 series
Are you sure? Config on my 2510 shows it as available
E2510STF(config)# aaa port-access mac-based
addr-format Set the MAC address format to be used in the RADIUS
request message (default no-delimiter).
[ethernet] PORT-LIST Manage MAC address based network authentication on the
device port(s).
I have 4, as I needed something small to replace the last of my hubs without the time or money to recable and run fibre.
All seems to be fine, except I forgot that you can't run 1Gb over 90m+ of Cat 5 cable :P
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By Joedetic in forum General Chat
Replies: 12
Last Post: 15th January 2009, 07:22 PM
-
By CheeseDog in forum Hardware
Replies: 7
Last Post: 1st November 2007, 05:54 PM
-
By mark in forum General Chat
Replies: 53
Last Post: 28th August 2007, 10:00 AM
-
By CheeseDog in forum Hardware
Replies: 4
Last Post: 31st March 2006, 06:53 PM
-
By russdev in forum General Chat
Replies: 5
Last Post: 18th January 2006, 04:29 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules