Wireless Networks Thread, Ruckus - Who has it? What do you think of it? in Technical; Originally Posted by bossman
How does it match up to Aerohive solution does anyone have the data on this as ...
1st February 2013, 10:58 AM #31
I've never looked into Aerhive but wouldnt the same thing happen if your internet went down and you had a cloud based controller?
Originally Posted by bossman
I believe (and i could be wrong as this is from memory) if your ZD goes down already connected clients will continue to work but any new clients wont.
1st February 2013, 10:07 PM #32
- Rep Power
How big is your ruckus install? 62 APs
How reliable is it? It just works. Its on and ignored. Ran happily now since Dec2009 with no issues.
How many devices you have on it?
Erm a hard one, we have around 300ish college devices (Laptops,MacBooks,some iPads) the we also have it serving our student BYOD setup.
Largest concurrent total to date was 724, but on average about 500 a day.
Any problems you have had? None
Did you self install or get a third party to install? Installed by Nexgen Solutions.
We have 2 (3 if you include our soon to be added EduRoam) SSIDs - a college protected one which only my department know the WPA2 key for - this SSID is hidden and only used for our college owned devices.
We then have a second SSID which is for our BYOD - the ruckus controller has an access rule on it that says anyone that connects to this SSID can only connect to a dedicated Microsoft TMG proxy on 8080 - they totally separated off and cannot see anything else on our LAN (I.e domain controllers etc) - they authenticate with an Active Directory username and password , et voila they can browse the web :-)
We only allow web browsing via our BYOD, but from this they can actually launch a VDI via our remote access if they wish.
It's been running since December 2009 and we haven't had a single issue with it.
2nd February 2013, 12:49 PM #33
Already associated clients will stay connected however no new clients can connect. Also, the APs will reboot after not being able to speak to the ZD for 20 minutes as part of an attempted recovery process (and if the ZD is still down when it comes back up it won't provide any wireless service until it comes back or it finds another). The new ZD code (9.5) which came out this week lets you disable or change this timeout value. In this scenario though Ruckus will suggest you purchase a backup controller...
Originally Posted by RTFM
Last edited by funkymunky; 2nd February 2013 at 12:51 PM.
2nd February 2013, 01:19 PM #34
Reality is that both Ruckus and Aerohive will do the job you want *if* the network is designed and installed correctly. 802.11 is very complex and although all the vendors have various features to try and simplify deployment, radio resource management etc. - if the APs are installed in the wrong place, they're in the wrong place no matter who the vendor (some will tell you otherwise though). A good Ruckus AP (7363, 7982 etc.) will give an excellent coverage area and you'll see a better download signal to a client than upload due to their dynamic beam-forming (which is fine in lots of networks as clients download more than they upload) however if you're network needs to be built for capacity rather than coverage (as you've got high concentrations of stations in the same areas requiring a lot of bandwidth each) then some of the Ruckus benefit is lost (that's not to say it won't work). Ruckus also have a feature called ChannelFly which uses statistical modelling of real world throughput to predict the best channel each AP should be on and will react to sudden throughput issues e.g. when someone/thing introduces a new source of interference. Again this can be very useful however one of the downsides is that each AP changes channel quite often, especially while it's in the initial learning stage (this problem can be mitigated if the clients support channel switch announcements).
Originally Posted by bossman
Build your list of requirements and take them to a recommended, reputable 802.11 network design company, they'll be able to then design you a sound system that will perform as required.
As for the controller being a single point of failure, it is but you can have a redundant unit running alongside the primary. If cost of the second unit is an issue point this out to your reseller and tell them it's potentially a deal breaker for you going with a competitor, you'd be surprised how creative they can become with pricing (and this goes for all vendors, not just Ruckus).
Although Meraki have a potentially good cloud management platform (depending on your needs) the radios don't perform particularly well in all the reputable testing I've seen. The MR24 was one of (if not) the first 3x3:3 enterprise AP on the market and it looks like they possibly rushed it and it's been slated in various reviews. Having said that some people are 'apparently' using them happily in high density scenarios.... (although that info came from someone trying to sell me Meraki kit!).
Last edited by funkymunky; 2nd February 2013 at 01:21 PM.
3rd February 2013, 09:21 PM #35
- Rep Power
What Cisco kit were you using? We use a WISM with a WCS Server and I've found it as sound as a pound.
Originally Posted by glennda
3rd February 2013, 10:03 PM #36
it was a controller based wireless access system, the model i cannot remember as i've left there now. It was half that it was setup badly (not by me) but also that it didn't have the throughput for what was specced before (again not by me!!)
Originally Posted by jtotheb
By creatinghavocagain in forum Virtual Learning Platforms
Last Post: 28th August 2011, 12:23 AM
By Little-Miss in forum General Chat
Last Post: 3rd March 2009, 09:52 AM
By gshaw in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 9th May 2008, 12:58 PM
By ZeroHour in forum Site Polls
Last Post: 8th January 2008, 09:45 AM
By schoolzone in forum MIS Systems
Last Post: 8th August 2007, 02:15 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)