Wired Networks Thread, Upgrade core switch in Technical; I'm looking to upgrade our core network switch which is an old Netgear L3 with 12 SFP ports - which ...
21st May 2014, 11:41 AM #1
Upgrade core switch
I'm looking to upgrade our core network switch which is an old Netgear L3 with 12 SFP ports - which connects our 8 fibre seperate subnets together. I'd like to keep this reasonably cost effective but would like to take it up from the 1gb to 10gb so the rest of the switches downstream can also be upgraded to 1gb as a minimum.
Anyone got any recommendations or band experiences with any particular models like this? To be honest the netgear is very basic, but has functioned very reliably for the last 7 years but we do need to take a step towards increasing our backbone speed.
21st May 2014, 12:05 PM #2
We put a pair of HP A5800s in a stack a couple of years ago, they've been excellent. You can get 10GbE modules for them and fibre expansion modules - there are two free slots at the back, we've filled one on each with 16 slot SFP modules for all our fibre.
All redundant, plenty fast enough, easily expandable for current and future needs (you can always stack extra switches if you really need) and great value for money compared to the ProCurve stuff.
Thanks to sonofsanta from:
21st May 2014, 12:35 PM #3
I have used the HP 4512zl for a number of years, it isn't particularly cheap as a chassis but there are plenty of deals that include a number of modules. They also so a 5406 if 12 bays is too much.
Thanks to foofighterjim from:
21st May 2014, 12:53 PM #4
We have a pair of Cisco 4500X switches at our core. They have been bomb proof! All our links to the stacks are 10GB
21st May 2014, 01:07 PM #5
Cheers, the HP ones seem to get favourable feedback in general
21st May 2014, 01:10 PM #6
I recently upgraded our entire infrastructure to Netgear from HP. the core switch is an M7300, 24 port SFP+ (capable of 10Gb fibre) with 4 10GbE capable ethernet combi-ports. I would highly recommend that.
Other than that, the HP ZL series chassis switch series is worth looking at, as that's what I took out, having had it for some time. It worked flawlessly, but the whole solution from HP was too expensive to consider getting additional modules for it.
Hope that helps.
Thanks to Sephiroth from:
22nd May 2014, 09:43 AM #7
- Rep Power
The 5800 pair solution is probably the best VFM at the moment and offers resailiency in HP's IRF. The pair, or more, can be virtualised with a 10G link which can be in a different builidng. Beware the capacity on some of the lower end (and possibly near end of sale) chassis switches. e.g. the 5406 will only support 2 x 10G links at full speed per slot.
22nd May 2014, 10:05 AM #8
Where did you get this information from? Not saying that you're wrong, as I had never actually speedchecked our fiber, but I had 8 x 10G links at running on my 5406 on 2 x 4 port modules.
Originally Posted by njc235
Either way, it doesn't matter to me, since I decided to utilise the fiber runs that my predecessor put in place, doubling up the fiber and giving us a 20G backbone for the price of 16 SFP+ trancievers!
22nd May 2014, 10:10 AM #9
We are using both the 5406zl and the 5412zl and they are both excellent switches. We have 2x 5412zl either end of a 10gb link to a remote site and one 5406zl as a main connection point in another part of the building. They've never failed (touches wood).
22nd May 2014, 10:16 AM #10
I love the netgear switches and that looks great, but why does it only have 4 ethernet ports? We have 8 Hyper-V servers i'd like to plug into it
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Also how is the noise levels on it? Ours is in my office so I need something thats quiet.
I've been impressed with the recent netgear switches.
22nd May 2014, 12:29 PM #11
I wouldn't say that it's quiet, but it's certainly quieter than any other switch that we have, with the exception of the M5300 series switches that we are using as edge switching.
Originally Posted by zag
As for the ethernet... It's a Fiber switch, not copper. If you want a 10G Copper switch, look at the M7100 which has 24 x 10G ethernet ports + 4 combi SFP+. Bear in mind that you would need the equivalent 10 capable cards in the back of your servers (without meaning to sound patronising... sorry).
I don't know what your setup is, but I would recommend having your core ONLY serving your cabinets (in our case the core rack is completely seperate from the server rack, but I would at least have a dedicated server switch stack).
I like the latest versions of them because when you stack them, you get 1 IP address and 1 interface for the stack, not 1 for each switch. Also means that you can have aggrigation over several switches. I have 1 x 10G fiber to 2 seperate switches in a stack set to a single 20 link.
Edit - if you don't like the sound in your office from the switches, I recommend one of these... APC NetShelter CX
I have the 38U version, and it's phenominal!
Last edited by Sephiroth; 22nd May 2014 at 12:34 PM.
Reason: Missed a bit...
Thanks to Sephiroth from:
22nd May 2014, 03:04 PM #12
The netgear XSM7224 look quite good too - about the £4k mark which leaves some budget for the secondary switches. Looks like the netgear ones require a license upgrade from L2 to L3 though.
22nd May 2014, 05:19 PM #13
That code encompasses both the M7300 and the M7100. At £4k it'll be the fiber one I assume?
Originally Posted by Sheridan
Yes, you'll need a licence to upgrade from L2+ to L3, though I've seen no reason to upgrade yet. the good thing is that if you need to in the future, you can just buy that licence.
23rd May 2014, 12:47 AM #14
- Rep Power
This is a small extract from a tech paper on the 5400/8200 chassis.
For wire-rate connectivity, do not connect more than two 10-GbE ports to a channel . In Figure 24, it is possibleto connect ports 1–4 for wire-rate connectivity because the first channel will have ports 1 and 4 connected,while the second channel will use ports 2 and 3 . If ports 1, 4, and 6 are connected, but other ports areunused, the three ports will share up to 23 .4 Gbps of bandwidth . If ports 1, 4, 6, and 8 are connected, theports will share 23 .4 Gbps of bandwidth between the four ports . The E8200 zl series can support up to fourwire-rate interfaces on an 8-port 10 GbE module (J9538A) .
The 10 GbE module (J9538A) delivers additional performance for E5400 zl Switches . When compared to thefirst-generation zl modules, the bandwidth channels have been improved to a maximum capacity of 15 .8 Gbpsper channel, as opposed to 14 .4 Gbps channels for the standard zl modules . An 8-port 10 GbE module hastwo 15 .8 Gbps channels, for an aggregate of 31 .6 Gbps of channel bandwidth . There is a fixed assignmentbetween ports and channel bandwidth . For 8-port 10 GbE modules, each 15 .8 Gbps channel is allocated tofour 10-GbE ports .
27th May 2014, 09:41 AM #15
@njc235: Fair enough. I din't realise this limitation, though I have 2 x 4 port 10G modules. Is the limitation only present when using a single 8 port module or is it over the whole chassis? I'll be iritated if it's the chassis, as the previous NM here had HP design our previous network infrastructure themselves.
By flyinghaggis in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 25th June 2008, 07:23 PM
By sidewinder in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 19th October 2007, 12:19 PM
By sidewinder in forum General Chat
Last Post: 28th July 2007, 10:10 AM
By tosca925 in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 6th February 2007, 10:10 AM
By localzuk in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 24th January 2007, 06:14 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)