If I have a server with 1 quad-core processor, do I need to get Server 2003 R2 to make use of it, or will the standard Server 2003 SP2 work just as well?
Cheers!
Printable View
If I have a server with 1 quad-core processor, do I need to get Server 2003 R2 to make use of it, or will the standard Server 2003 SP2 work just as well?
Cheers!
Windows XP/2003/Vista/2008 will all work with Quad cores with no problems. You'll also see more graphs in Task Manager :) No need to upgrade to R2 in your case, unless you want the additional R2 functions too.
We recently put a new server in a primary school that's quad core. Win2k3 SP1 Standard works fine, as you can see from these screen shots. :)
Remeber that you'll need Enterprise edition if you plan to address more than 4GB RAM. :)
We are putting in 8GB now with most of our new servers.
Running a dual quad core here. 4GB of but only using 900mb. Roll on vmware!
Ah Fair Point
What are the additional functions in R2 and is it worth upgrading from R1?
We've only got a R1 licence but the question was a general one as I've never used R2 before. Don't think I want to change at the moment as the system is working fine and if it's not broke don't fix it ;)
Bit of a success story but i've installed Sp2 and R2 components across the servers this week and made use of the R2 functions...
Blocking crap (mp3's videos etc) was a doddle - saved hrs of testing gp's and simply enabled file screening.
Also generated some reports and free'd up 40ish GB!
Another point to mention is that our backup was taking 16hrs @ 450mb/min and its now doing 950-1gb/min!!!
Works with sims, aimhigh and vertitas v10 (older 1) although you need to generate a report using FSRM before else the backup may fail (if you are using the updated R2 file server features).
Overall im very chuffed! :)
w00p