Windows Thread, Adobe Flash Plugin Vs Active X in Technical; Today I have deployed Firefox to some office machines and realised that a Flash plugin will need installing to get ...
-
17th November 2011, 03:59 PM #1 Adobe Flash Plugin Vs Active X
Today I have deployed Firefox to some office machines and realised that a Flash plugin will need installing to get it working with sites such as Youtube et al.
Currently deployed is the Flash Active X msi for IE. I was wondering if I made the move to the plugin msi, will this work with IE and not just Firefox?
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
17th November 2011, 04:15 PM #2 The plugin only works with 3rd-party browsers. You'll still need the ActiveX version for IE.
Both are easy to deploy silently though. I personally prefer the .exe pushed with -install, but that's because Adobe historically make problematic .msi packages.
-
-
17th November 2011, 08:37 PM #3 Active X is for IE
Plugin is for FF or other browsers
So you'll need both. The MSIs are something like 4MB each.
-
-
18th November 2011, 08:52 AM #4 Seriously just don't know why Adobe don't combine both into one package, no need more them to be seprate
-
-
18th November 2011, 08:58 AM #5 
Originally Posted by
Michael
So you'll need both. The MSIs are something like 4MB each.
Unless you get the 64bit ones which are about twice as big as they contain and install both the 32 and 64 bit versions.
-
-
18th November 2011, 01:23 PM #6 Indeed very true Synack. You can still install Flash 32Bit on a 64Bit client. I can't tell any difference between the two (from a user perspective).
-
-
18th November 2011, 01:25 PM #7 
Originally Posted by
Michael
Indeed very true Synack. You can still install Flash 32Bit on a 64Bit client. I can't tell any difference between the two (from a user perspective).
They are identical, its just that the 32 bit one does not work in the 64 bit version of IE as well which can cause issues as above.
-
-
20th November 2011, 01:19 PM #8 
Originally Posted by
pritchardavid
Seriously just don't know why Adobe don't combine both into one package, no need more them to be seprate
I suppose as Synack pointed out, deploying Flash would be something like 10MB in size instead of 4MB. It can make a big difference deploying to workstations.
You don't really get dual 32/64Bit installers. Most if not all 32Bit installers will work on 64Bit, just not the other way around.
-
-
21st November 2011, 12:22 PM #9
- Rep Power
- 0
We use the MSI's as the exes were bothersome via GPO. All you have to do is apply for Deplyment rights.
I agree about the dual package, they should be bundled imho. How much is 10mb in the grand scheme of things??
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
By Arthur in forum IT News
Replies: 3
Last Post: 9th November 2011, 05:26 PM
-
By jbsa in forum How do you do....it?
Replies: 2
Last Post: 26th March 2007, 11:55 AM
-
By tosca925 in forum How do you do....it?
Replies: 2
Last Post: 9th October 2006, 10:03 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules