Windows Thread, worst fragmentation ever? in Technical; major whoops. Just discovered our backup server backup drive volume is 80%! fragmented.
thats a 1.6tb volume 73% used 591,193 ...
-
6th November 2009, 01:06 PM #1 worst fragmentation ever?
major whoops. Just discovered our backup server backup drive volume is 80%! fragmented.
thats a 1.6tb volume 73% used 591,193 files in 60,919 folders
trying to de-fragment it but it's slow going. it managed 2% overnight
-
-
6th November 2009, 01:10 PM #2
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:18 PM #3 use a better defragger like diskkeeper.
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:21 PM #4 don't bother, you'll spent days defragmenting, and one night of backup jobs later it'll be the same...and it really doesn't make restore/backup jobs, that take a lot of time anyway, much faster.
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:21 PM #5 I presume you ran a checkdisk/scandisk first? Always important you do this!
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:22 PM #6 Our backup exec box did this regularly, we found it to be to do with the size (we'd been using 50GB) disk back up files.
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:24 PM #7 We defrag all our machines and servers daily to stop this. It doesn't take long at all when you keep ontop of it
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:24 PM #8 Put some SSD's into it and then defrag won't matter
Last edited by DAckroyd; 6th November 2009 at 02:25 PM.
Reason: missing a P
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:44 PM #9 We have a scripted defrag here too, take a few seconds and keeps them relativly free from large fragments. Well worth setting up.
-
-
6th November 2009, 02:48 PM #10 
Originally Posted by
DAckroyd
Put some SSD's into it and then defrag won't matter

I wish this was cheap enough to be possible solution.

Originally Posted by
rvdmast
don't bother, you'll spent days defragmenting, and one night of backup jobs later it'll be the same...and it really doesn't make restore/backup jobs, that take a lot of time anyway, much faster.
Agreed.
Other idea, MOVE TO LINUX!
-
-
6th November 2009, 03:14 PM #11 With the speed of todays processors, hard drives and the busses does fragmentation really matter?
Ben
-
-
6th November 2009, 03:19 PM #12 
Originally Posted by
plexer
With the speed of todays processors, hard drives and the busses does fragmentation really matter?
Ben
To steal a well known supermarket's slogan - "Every little helps"
-
-
6th November 2009, 03:23 PM #13 
Originally Posted by
matt40k
I wish this was cheap enough to be possible solution.
I've just put SSDs in my Sims and Profile servers. Massive improvement but time will tell on the reliability.
160gb Intel X-25M are about £300 these days, well worth the investment I reckon.
-
-
6th November 2009, 03:46 PM #14 For SIMS, yer £300 isn't bad. But for a backup server? Not yet.
-
-
6th November 2009, 04:17 PM #15 
Originally Posted by
plexer
With the speed of todays processors, hard drives and the busses does fragmentation really matter?
Ben
i cottoned on to it when it took a suspiciously long time to install some windows updates. the c: drive was like 40% fragmented too :-S
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
By FN-GM in forum IT News
Replies: 4
Last Post: 6th October 2009, 12:48 PM
-
By mattx in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
Replies: 6
Last Post: 4th February 2009, 06:01 PM
-
By beeswax in forum General Chat
Replies: 0
Last Post: 31st August 2008, 09:05 AM
-
By reggiep in forum General Chat
Replies: 22
Last Post: 23rd May 2008, 10:42 PM
-
By browolf in forum Windows
Replies: 7
Last Post: 25th April 2008, 12:42 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules