Windows Thread, Profiles in Technical; Hi Guys
What is the breakdown of you guys out there using roaming profiles v's mandatory profiles.
Trying to get ...
-
3rd July 2009, 03:24 PM #1 Profiles
Hi Guys
What is the breakdown of you guys out there using roaming profiles v's mandatory profiles.
Trying to get it in my head the best way forward relating to thin clients and fat clients, so my users get the best expereince when logging in?
Any ideas greatfully accepted
Thanks
Chris
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:28 PM #2
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:32 PM #3 Cheers Steve
The issue i have is i am moving to roaming profiles, which will have the icons for their local apps already installed. The thin clients don't have any local apps they use our terminal servrs. just stuggling to come up with an Idea for suite both
Chris
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:34 PM #4 have a look into desktop icon relocation, this will change the way what Icons users can see
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:35 PM #5 I hate thin clients, the amount of power the server has to hold for medium to high end applications is ridiculous.
Don't forget what you save in price of desktops, youll probably lose in paying for servers to run them. Oh and networking :P
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:42 PM #6 
Originally Posted by
Potato-Peeler
I hate thin clients, the amount of power the server has to hold for medium to high end applications is ridiculous.
Don't forget what you save in price of desktops, youll probably lose in paying for servers to run them. Oh and networking :P

You also save on power consumption, ease of management and a whole raft of factors.
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:48 PM #7 Mandatory profiles for the kids
Roaming for the staff... though TBH, I wish I could getaway with forcing mandatory on the staff too.
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:49 PM #8 Will the server power consumption edit out that though? As to run it you have to have some pretty beefy servers to do this kind of thing won't you? Like 8 GB RAM and two xeons? I'm not sure on that one.
Also if one application becomes corrupt or fails for whatever reason on the server, e.g. MS Word, will it not mean the entire room can't use it, instead of one P.C?
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:50 PM #9
- Rep Power
- 0

Originally Posted by
elsiegee40
Mandatory profiles for the kids
Roaming for the staff... though TBH, I wish I could getaway with forcing mandatory on the staff too.
how do you work with fat clients that have apps and thin clients that dont have apps
How would you force the icons on to a thin client?
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:52 PM #10
- Rep Power
- 0

Originally Posted by
Potato-Peeler
Will the server power consumption edit out that though? As to run it you have to have some pretty beefy servers to do this kind of thing won't you? Like 8 GB RAM and two xeons? I'm not sure on that one.
Also if one application becomes corrupt or fails for whatever reason on the server, e.g. MS Word, will it not mean the entire room can't use it, instead of one P.C?
you take the TS server out the pool, fix the problem then put it back - just have more than one server to run apps
-
-
3rd July 2009, 03:59 PM #11 
Originally Posted by
fil_b
how do you work with fat clients that have apps and thin clients that dont have apps
How would you force the icons on to a thin client?
Fat clients only - no thin here
-
-
3rd July 2009, 08:57 PM #12 
Originally Posted by
fil_b
how do you work with fat clients that have apps and thin clients that dont have apps
How would you force the icons on to a thin client?
Terminal servers in separate OU in Active Directory, possibly separate OU/GPO for Fat clients - setup a User Policy Loopback on the Computer configuration of GPO, then setup different desktop and start menu redirection for each GPO.
I'm planning to have mandatory profiles for students (and remove ranger in the not too distant future), and have roaming profiles for staff, storing their desktop bits in a folder within their my docs (so they can add stuff to the desktop, and not cause insane profile size... my staff like to leave videos on their desktop, or folders...), and redirect desktop to there. Other GPO settings will allow all user's desktop and start menu to show up, so for my staff, on their laptops, I will let them just have their current start menu, on the TS I'll be setting them to a standard start menu. Need to finish fully testing this, and gradually start moving staff onto the system after the summer, but I think it should balance network speed and give the user's a more consistent environment.
-
-
3rd July 2009, 09:31 PM #13 
Originally Posted by
fil_b
How would you force the icons on to a thin client?
My desktops at school have very few icons - just well-structured start menus.
Room-specific software is found by going to Start > Science Room or Start > ICT Suite
It's more flexible for me that way.
-
-
3rd July 2009, 10:19 PM #14
-
-
3rd July 2009, 10:19 PM #15 
Originally Posted by
elsiegee40
Mandatory profiles for the kids
Roaming for the staff... though TBH, I wish I could getaway with forcing mandatory on the staff too.
Mandatory for both here. I've just told them that's the way it is with a network!
All fat clients, and very few icons on desktop. Must be a primary school thing?
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
By shafia2009 in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
Replies: 16
Last Post: 16th June 2009, 11:00 PM
-
By Dafty in forum Windows
Replies: 8
Last Post: 26th January 2009, 10:44 AM
-
By Chuckster in forum Windows
Replies: 8
Last Post: 22nd August 2008, 01:21 PM
-
By Obinice in forum Windows
Replies: 10
Last Post: 27th March 2008, 10:17 PM
-
By colin in forum Learning Network Manager
Replies: 1
Last Post: 6th April 2006, 02:23 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules