Windows Thread, DHCP problem HELP!!!! in Technical; Created DHCP on a new server.
Setup the scope to be
192.168.0.1 - 192.168.7.254
Subnet 255.255.248.0
DNS setup correctly and ...
-
27th July 2006, 12:06 PM #1 DHCP problem HELP!!!!
Created DHCP on a new server.
Setup the scope to be
192.168.0.1 - 192.168.7.254
Subnet 255.255.248.0
DNS setup correctly and the gateway.
I then excluded 192.168.0.* and 192.168.3.* from the range. When I renew the address on a pc I get the addrss of 192.168.1.0 which I know can't be used as its the subnet mask address but it still manages it how can I stop this bl**dy thing from messing up? I know you can exclude 192.168.*.255 but it doesn't allow 192.168*.0 to be excluded!
Wes
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
27th July 2006, 12:17 PM #2 Re: DHCP problem HELP!!!!
I have had issues like that before and I am sure it let me exclude them. There must be a better way to fix it though.
Maybe I did it just for the single address.
-
-
27th July 2006, 12:22 PM #3 Re: DHCP problem HELP!!!!
Actually just thinking if the subnet mask is 255.255.248.0 then the subnet mask IP address would only be 192.168.0.0 with the 192.168.*.255 as broadcasts? So 192.168.2.0 is valid?
CCNA people out there is this correct?
Wes
-
-
27th July 2006, 01:04 PM #4 Re: DHCP problem HELP!!!!
a .0 address is valid. It will cause interesting problems on older buggy TCP/IP stacks (mostly Print Servers and Microsoft stuff). If in doubt avoid handing out .0 addresses. .255 addresses have similar issues.
I suggest you break down your IP range into several class C scopes and override the netmask DHCP option.
-
-
27th July 2006, 01:42 PM #5 Re: DHCP problem HELP!!!!
Would that be one superscope then 0.* 1.* 2.* etc..? How would I override the netmask DHCP option?
Wes
-
-
27th July 2006, 02:33 PM #6 Re: DHCP problem HELP!!!!
Just had a look here. $%^$* inflexible MS DHCP server. You can't do it that way with it. So that leaves you with the following options.
1) Create one big scope. Either do not include the problematic IP's in the IP range or use reservations to exclude them.
2) Create serveral smaller scopes. Use a router to route between your seperate IP ranges.
3) As above, but instead of using a router, use static routes to a smaller scope that holds your servers.
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
By dezt in forum Networks
Replies: 20
Last Post: 11th March 2009, 11:18 AM
-
By thegrassisgreener in forum Mac
Replies: 4
Last Post: 18th January 2008, 09:50 AM
-
By tmcd35 in forum Networks
Replies: 4
Last Post: 9th October 2007, 12:02 PM
-
By NetworkGeezer in forum Networks
Replies: 2
Last Post: 19th April 2007, 04:01 PM
-
By Dos_Box in forum Networks
Replies: 7
Last Post: 30th September 2005, 01:14 AM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules