+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
Windows Thread, Ris v Normal Build in Technical; Here we use RIS to build machines. It has been successful. Some F series RM machines refuse to build using ...
  1. #1

    garethedmondson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Gowerton, Swansea
    Posts
    2,200
    Thank Post
    936
    Thanked 315 Times in 184 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    163

    Ris v Normal Build

    Here we use RIS to build machines. It has been successful.

    Some F series RM machines refuse to build using RIS due to an issue with the BIOS - so we hand build them and then update the BIOS.

    Anyway - I've just taken a call from the technician telling me that hand built machines perform a lot better than RIS built machines. I'm quite happy with RIS - it works.

    Is this the case or shall I send him around the school to rebuild every machine manually so we can see the performance increase he claims there is :-)

    GJE

  2. #2
    Quackers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,276
    Thank Post
    39
    Thanked 135 Times in 111 Posts
    Rep Power
    51
    I fail to see how a handbuilt is any faster than a RIS built, same files... only difference is you have a config file auto answering questions for you and the files come down a network cable instead of off a CD....

  3. #3

    garethedmondson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Gowerton, Swansea
    Posts
    2,200
    Thank Post
    936
    Thanked 315 Times in 184 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by Quackers View Post
    I fail to see how a handbuilt is any faster than a RIS built, same files... only difference is you have a config file auto answering questions for you and the files come down a network cable instead of off a CD....
    The advice given is probably politically motivated as he doesn't like the other technician who set our RIS up for us.

    GJE

  4. #4
    PeterW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    745
    Thank Post
    42
    Thanked 65 Times in 60 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Anyway - I've just taken a call from the technician telling me that hand built machines perform a lot better than RIS built machines. I'm quite happy with RIS - it works.
    Souds like tosh to me

  5. #5
    flyinghaggis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    934
    Thank Post
    93
    Thanked 65 Times in 53 Posts
    Rep Power
    75
    Different drivers possibly? Either that or something you've built into the RIS image that shouldn't be there when you captured it maybe?

  6. #6

    powdarrmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Alcester, Warwickshire
    Posts
    4,855
    Thank Post
    412
    Thanked 777 Times in 650 Posts
    Rep Power
    181
    Somebody has a grudge...

    I'd go with your plan of getting a comparison done. Imaging every machine in the school twice will soon shush him up.

  7. #7
    salan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    384
    Thank Post
    41
    Thanked 42 Times in 28 Posts
    Rep Power
    27
    Myself, I would say that IF the RIS is set up FULLY correctly for the machine, then its just as good.
    The only time I could see that it woldn't be is if in the setup of the answer files etc there has been compromises made to make it more 'universal'.

  8. #8
    DrPerceptron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    849
    Thank Post
    32
    Thanked 120 Times in 102 Posts
    Rep Power
    37
    I've suspected that handbuilt machines are quicker than machines we've deployed via WDS, I don't know what would make that so, but I've always suspected it.

    Mainly because a reference PC I had was 10-15 seconds quicker logging on a new user and reacting to bigger, meatier applications.

  9. #9

    Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,941
    Thank Post
    232
    Thanked 1,512 Times in 1,206 Posts
    Rep Power
    328
    It simply isn't true, however I would say great care and thorough testing is needed before deploying any image, using whichever method.

    RIS is simply a deployment tool/mechanism whereas the image itself is what users actually use

  10. #10
    jsnetman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    887
    Thank Post
    23
    Thanked 134 Times in 126 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Mainly because a reference PC I had was 10-15 seconds quicker logging on a new user and reacting to bigger, meatier applications
    Probably because the comparison was done on the manually built machine before it was joined to the domain and its policies. If RIS is setup properly it automatically joins the domain and receives its policies therefore slowing the logon time.

  11. #11
    pagelad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    181
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
    Rep Power
    13
    Cant comment on RIS but i just quickly deployed a WDS image and installed a machine to compare, both booted up at the same time

  12. #12
    dalsoth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Cambridgeshire
    Posts
    547
    Thank Post
    190
    Thanked 108 Times in 80 Posts
    Rep Power
    46
    Can i also say that the F series work much better with a full case off and clean inside with toothbrush Get your techie on to that too ASAP. Dust waits for no man!!!!

  13. #13


    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In the server room, with the lead pipe.
    Posts
    4,537
    Thank Post
    271
    Thanked 752 Times in 590 Posts
    Rep Power
    218
    Like others have said, unless your RIS setup is broken, there shouldn't be a real difference.

    You could (as a test) build one from scratch with slipstreamed XP cd, install the apps and then capture using WDS, and build another using the default image in RIS. Deploy both to identical machine and see if there's a difference.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Is this normal?
    By button_ripple in forum Windows
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 19th May 2008, 02:29 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 16th November 2006, 12:50 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 23rd February 2006, 07:38 PM
  4. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 31st August 2005, 07:46 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •