+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Windows Server 2012 Thread, Windows 2012 cluster in Technical; Hi all, I am wondering if you could give me some advice on which way to go... Option 1 Would ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Rotherham
    Posts
    82
    Thank Post
    34
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Question Windows 2012 cluster

    Hi all,

    I am wondering if you could give me some advice on which way to go...

    Option 1

    Would be to create a 2 or 3 node hyper v cluster and connect these to a SAN to run our network


    Option 2

    Would be create a 2 node file server connected to a SAN, then using Smb to a hyper v 2node cluster. Not sure if this would be necessary.

    I was thinking along the lines of option 1, less resources necessary. What is your thought ?


    Thanks in advance..

  2. #2

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    16,373
    Thank Post
    906
    Thanked 1,811 Times in 1,559 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    468
    option 1, its more simple.

  3. Thanks to FN-GM from:

    smalls001 (7th March 2014)

  4. #3

    dhicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    5,772
    Thank Post
    1,308
    Thanked 804 Times in 698 Posts
    Rep Power
    246
    Quote Originally Posted by smalls001 View Post
    Would be to create a 2 or 3 node hyper v cluster and connect these to a SAN to run our network
    If I understand correctly, doesn't Hyper-V let you use a DFS share as a VM image repository, so you can have your VM images duplicated between two servers for fail-over purposes and skip having to buy a SAN?

  5. Thanks to dhicks from:

    smalls001 (7th March 2014)

  6. #4

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,523
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 2,645 Times in 2,047 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by dhicks View Post
    If I understand correctly, doesn't Hyper-V let you use a DFS share as a VM image repository, so you can have your VM images duplicated between two servers for fail-over purposes and skip having to buy a SAN?
    No. Sadly not. Dfs doesn't work with hyper-v. It doesn't interact with VSS so the hyper-v disk images don't get updated.

  7. Thanks to localzuk from:

    smalls001 (7th March 2014)

  8. #5
    jbailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77
    Thank Post
    21
    Thanked 31 Times in 17 Posts
    Rep Power
    34
    I think your thinking of scofs in relation to option 2.

    http://www.petri.co.il/windows-serve...ile-server.htm

    I looked at this when 2012 was released but just don't see what the advantages are. Seems to just be over complicating things and ultimately relying on less reliable storage than a San would provide.

  9. #6

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    18,523
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 2,645 Times in 2,047 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    924
    The main advantage? Price. A couple of JBOD trays and a couple of run of the mill servers connected to your normal switch come in significantly cheaper than a full SAN. Plus, you're using kit that is basically commodity hardware so is easier to replace if it fails. There's no hardware RAID so you're not tired to specific controllers, you can just slap the disks into another JBOD tray and another Win 2k12 server can load the storage spaces.

  10. #7


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.403651, -0.515458
    Posts
    9,792
    Thank Post
    262
    Thanked 2,964 Times in 2,179 Posts
    Rep Power
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by jbailey View Post
    I looked at this when 2012 was released but just don't see what the advantages are.
    As localzuk mentioned above, the main advantage is price. The example configurations given in the articles below don't seem particularly complicated.

    Getting started with DataOn JBOD in WS2012 R2 Scale-Out File Server « Aidan Finn

    What I have built is the equivalent (more actually) of a 2-node Hyper-V cluster with a SAS attached SAN … albeit with tiered storage … and that storage was less than half the cost of a SAN from Dell/HP. In fact, the retail price of the HDDs is around 1/3 the list price of the HP equivalent. There is no comparison.

    I deployed a bunch of VMs with differential disks last night. Nice and quick. Then I pinned the parent VHD to the SSD tier and created a boot storm. Once again, nice and quick. Nothing scientific has been done and I haven't done comparison tests yet.

    But it was all simple to set up and way cheaper than traditional SAN. You can't beat that!
    A kit/parts list for a WS2012 R2 Hyper-V cluster with DataOn SMB 3.0 storage « Aidan Finn

    One of the benefits of SMB 3.0 storage is that a shared folder is more flexible than a CSV on a SAN LUN. There are more sharing options, and this means that Live Migration can span the traditional boundary of storage without involving Shared-Nothing Live Migration.

    [...]

    I recently priced up a kit, similar to above. It came in much cheaper than the equivalent blade/SAN configuration, which was a nice surprise. Even better was that the SOFS had 3 times more storage included than the SAN in that pricing!

  11. #8
    jbailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    77
    Thank Post
    21
    Thanked 31 Times in 17 Posts
    Rep Power
    34
    Thanks,

    Re price - yes, didn't really think about it tbh.

    That's an interesting article, I had not seen it set out like that where there is not a further level of hyper v nodes above the sofs nodes and with hyperv enabled on the sofs themselves.

    Would be interested I looking at building something like that to try this out, sofs/storage spaces does look fun, but didn't see much in the way of low cost boxes when I first looked on the list of supported kit for this kind of setup, I think the jbod in the article was the only on on it



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23rd April 2014, 05:31 PM
  2. Windows 2012 Print Server
    By linkazoid in forum Windows Server 2012
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18th September 2013, 02:31 PM
  3. Building a test Windows 2012 environment
    By MrWu in forum Windows Server 2012
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 14th September 2013, 12:23 PM
  4. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 2nd July 2013, 09:58 AM
  5. Has anyone set up hyper-v 2012 cluster?
    By nicholab in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 3rd November 2012, 12:51 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •