+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
Windows Server 2008 Thread, W2k3 or w2k8 in Technical; As a lot of you know, I just use servers as file/print/dhcp/dns servers with XP home/Win7 Starter clients. I don't ...
  1. #1

    SimpleSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    5,808
    Thank Post
    1,476
    Thanked 592 Times in 444 Posts
    Rep Power
    168

    W2k3 or w2k8

    As a lot of you know, I just use servers as file/print/dhcp/dns servers with XP home/Win7 Starter clients. I don't use AD.

    I'm setting up a new school (new to me that is) 40 new Win7 clients with about 20 old XP Machines with a new physical server machine.

    Should I go with w2k8 instead of my tried and tested w2k3. Will it give me any advantages for my non-AD setup.? All will it give me headaches?

    regards

    Simon

  2. #2
    jamesreedersmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ruskington
    Posts
    1,152
    Thank Post
    78
    Thanked 253 Times in 227 Posts
    Rep Power
    76
    Why dont you use AD? would make management soooo much easier! But 2k8 R2

  3. #3

    3s-gtech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    2,711
    Thank Post
    144
    Thanked 548 Times in 492 Posts
    Rep Power
    149
    New build, newest OS - just makes sense from a maintenace perspective. Not sure if the services you use have many changes over 2k3, but some newer features are pretty cool.

  4. #4


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    8,750
    Thank Post
    221
    Thanked 2,626 Times in 1,936 Posts
    Rep Power
    778
    Quote Originally Posted by jamesreedersmith View Post
    Why don't you use AD?
    Quote Originally Posted by SimpleSi View Post
    XP home/Win7 Starter clients.
    Could be this? ^

  5. #5


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    8,750
    Thank Post
    221
    Thanked 2,626 Times in 1,936 Posts
    Rep Power
    778
    As mentioned above, go with 2008 R2. In terms of printing, there have been numerous improvements since Windows Server 2003 was released eight years ago.

  6. #6

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15,821
    Thank Post
    873
    Thanked 1,675 Times in 1,458 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    444
    Also take into account security updates finish for 2003 in 2 years. So when that time comes you will have to update anyway. You might as well do it now.

  7. #7


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,575
    Thank Post
    228
    Thanked 852 Times in 731 Posts
    Rep Power
    294
    id go with a current os so 08r2

    not to mention you might find it hard to get drivers for 2003 on current hardware

    now granted if its just being used as a nas box with dhcp/printers most of the 08r2 extras are probably of 0 use

    though depending on your printers you may have driver issues with them on 08r2 older hps are particularly prone to being poor imo

  8. Thanks to sted from:

    SimpleSi (5th March 2012)

  9. #8

    SimpleSi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lancashire
    Posts
    5,808
    Thank Post
    1,476
    Thanked 592 Times in 444 Posts
    Rep Power
    168
    Ta people

    I'm thinking now I should install w2k8 on the new physical server and vm convert the old w2k3 server onto it and keep that as the printer server for the old printers (until I can persaude the head of having 2 networked photocopiers for printing (I love my schools that have this )

    Simon

  10. #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    67
    Thank Post
    14
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Rep Power
    8
    How do you manage your users using home version clients and without AD?

    Use Server 2008 R2

  11. #10

    Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    9,262
    Thank Post
    242
    Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,250 Posts
    Rep Power
    340
    If you're going to continue to use a server just for File, Print, DHCP and DNS there are zero benefits between 2003 and 2008/2008 R2. Basic file services are the same, Print Management is great, although you couldn't use it, DHCP allows you to use IPv6 out the box and DNS is the same too.

    If you were going to use Active Directory and Windows 7 Professional, then there are a lot of advantages to using 2008 R2. It allows you to control 7 to the max.

    Extended support for 2003 Server is July 2015.

  12. #11


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    8,750
    Thank Post
    221
    Thanked 2,626 Times in 1,936 Posts
    Rep Power
    778

  13. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,032
    Thank Post
    82
    Thanked 187 Times in 154 Posts
    Rep Power
    83
    Don't forget that sims will not work on 2003 next year.

  14. #13


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,202
    Thank Post
    442
    Thanked 1,032 Times in 812 Posts
    Rep Power
    339
    Quote Originally Posted by SimpleSi View Post
    All will it give me headaches?
    2003 > 2008 print server caused us a mass of headaches with drivers for XP/win7 64.
    I avoided linux print servers because I thought the transition would be more simple with windows. I was wrong.
    Once it was setup it ran fine, but with 50+ printers and papercut it was much more of a headache than I expected.

  15. #14

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,039
    Thank Post
    852
    Thanked 2,666 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    767
    Quote Originally Posted by CyberNerd View Post
    2003 > 2008 print server caused us a mass of headaches with drivers for XP/win7 64.
    I avoided linux print servers because I thought the transition would be more simple with windows. I was wrong.
    Once it was setup it ran fine, but with 50+ printers and papercut it was much more of a headache than I expected.
    Depends on the printers and drivers, we had no issues with our HP gear, I know many like to hate on their drivers but they worked fine for us. Besides if you have any 64bit clients you need to get it sorted anyway.

    If you are putting it in new go 2008 R2 simply because it is the current one and you are not installing something that is going to fall out of support so quickly in comparison. There is no point in investing an and installing old tech as you are just causing problems for the future by constraining yourself now. How well do you think 2003 will cope with Windows 8 PCs etc as your server will probably still be around at that time.

  16. #15


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,202
    Thank Post
    442
    Thanked 1,032 Times in 812 Posts
    Rep Power
    339
    Quote Originally Posted by SYNACK View Post
    Depends on the printers and drivers, we had no issues with our HP gear, I know many like to hate on their drivers but they worked fine for us. Besides if you have any 64bit clients you need to get it sorted anyway.

    If you are putting it in new go 2008 R2 simply because it is the current one and you are not installing something that is going to fall out of support so quickly in comparison. There is no point in investing an and installing old tech as you are just causing problems for the future by constraining yourself now. How well do you think 2003 will cope with Windows 8 PCs etc as your server will probably still be around at that time.
    absolutely; it was entirely driver problems which we would have needed to sort anyway for 64bit. They were all HP laserjets, loads of different models.
    Its all working now, just took about a week ironing out glitches.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Remove W2K8 from forest of W2K3 servers fails
    By Jim_F in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 5th December 2011, 03:27 AM
  2. Whats best, Fixed or Dynamic IP?
    By ninjabeaver in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 19th February 2009, 07:01 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26th August 2005, 01:29 AM
  4. Ghost or software packaging?
    By eejit in forum Windows
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 2nd August 2005, 10:06 PM
  5. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2nd August 2005, 11:48 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •