Welcome, Register for free! or Login below:
EduGeek.net RSS Feeds Register FAQ Members Social Groups User Map Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Windows Server 2008 Most of us will be using this before Vista we suspect, so let's get all future problems ironed out here first.

Go Back   EduGeek.net Forums > Technical > Windows Server 2008
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search Thread
Sponsored Links
Old 20-11-2009, 10:53 AM   #1
 
DAckroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
uk uk england
Thanks: 66
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 10 DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about
Lightbulb DFS For Synchronizing between Domains

Hi all,
In my move to a new domain I have reached the point of wanting to have users data on my new servers... I was thinking: If I setup DFS on my new servers can I get it to keep the documents n*Sync while we're in the transfer process, also meaning that I wouldn't have to change what's happening with backups as all files would be on both servers (backup in it's self) and goto tape from the old domain.

Hope this is making sense...

If this would work for setting up DFS then do I need to install DFS on both servers (source and destination)?

Thanks for your help
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 11:57 AM   #2
 
altecsole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 249
uk
Thanks: 19
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 12 altecsole will become famous soon enough
Default

We use DFS replication for fault tolerance. We replicate user data between two servers; when one failed a few weeks ago it really proved it's worth.

I don't think replication will work between domains though. Also, when you add the second target and initiate replication make sure you disable the second target until replication is complete. Otherwise users may get connected to an empty (or partially replicted) folder. Once repliction has completed (check the event log) you can enable the second target.

Be cautious about backup; replication isn't a substitute. If you delete a file on one server, it's gone on the other one too!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks to altecsole from:
DAckroyd (20-11-2009)
Old 20-11-2009, 12:07 PM   #3
 
DAckroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
uk uk england
Thanks: 66
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 10 DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about
Default

thanks altecsole,
is there any way of keeping 2 shares synced with eachother?

syncing works as backup if a server goes down and tape setup to backup old servers so can leave going until new domain fully deployed
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 12:22 PM   #4
 
altecsole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 249
uk
Thanks: 19
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 12 altecsole will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAckroyd View Post
thanks altecsole,
is there any way of keeping 2 shares synced with eachother?

syncing works as backup if a server goes down and tape setup to backup old servers so can leave going until new domain fully deployed
Yes, you can setup replication to replicate both ways, so any changes made on one server replicate back to the other. If you map the DFS namespace (as we do) you need to disable the second target until initial replication is complete. Once it is, you enable the second target and they user is connected to either of your replicated shares (you can replicate to several servers if you wish). You can still use DFS replication and just use a UNC path to map users drives, but I'd urge you to consider using DFS namespaces.

You can also setup one way repliction. This can be useful if you want to replicate data from a number of servers to a single location prior to running a backup.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 12:39 PM   #5
 
DAckroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
uk uk england
Thanks: 66
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 10 DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by altecsole View Post
Yes, you can setup replication to replicate both ways, so any changes made on one server replicate back to the other. If you map the DFS namespace (as we do) you need to disable the second target until initial replication is complete. Once it is, you enable the second target and they user is connected to either of your replicated shares (you can replicate to several servers if you wish). You can still use DFS replication and just use a UNC path to map users drives, but I'd urge you to consider using DFS namespaces.

You can also setup one way repliction. This can be useful if you want to replicate data from a number of servers to a single location prior to running a backup.
I did look into DFS Namespace but I didn't see much need as the servers are VM's so wouldn't offer much as far as I can see...
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 12:52 PM   #6
 
altecsole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 249
uk
Thanks: 19
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
Rep Power: 12 altecsole will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAckroyd View Post
I did look into DFS Namespace but I didn't see much need as the servers are VM's so wouldn't offer much as far as I can see...
I suppose it depends on what you're doing. If you connect users to a DFS namespace, where there are several replicated targets, they can continue to work normally even if the server they're accessing the files from goes off-line. DFS will just connect them to another one of the replication servers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 01:24 PM   #7
 
DAckroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
uk uk england
Thanks: 66
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 10 DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about
Default

Possible BINGO! here...

Built a 2k8 server on a workgroup and using it as an inbetween computer
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 03:56 PM   #8
 
DAckroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 460
uk uk england
Thanks: 66
Thanked 34 Times in 21 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 10 DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about DAckroyd has a spectacular aura about
Default

I feel like I'm on a roundabout here... I think the DFS on a workgoup machine has some potential but I'm just struggling with the older domain...

I thought I'd see what Windows Server Backup had to offer... anyway, moving on.

I've searched the internet for some kind of powershell script thing but no joy but if someone has something for the job in their pocket then that would be nice please

other option is 3rd party products so if anyone know of anything, please say

Thanks,
Dave
  Reply With Quote
Reply

EduGeek.net Forums > Technical > Windows Server 2008

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DFS Permissions Gatt Windows Server 2008 1 06-08-2009 12:40 PM
DFS and its use techie211 Windows Server 2000/2003 10 28-04-2009 09:35 PM
Group Policy not synchronizing between our two DC. noser Windows 3 10-02-2009 08:12 PM
problem synchronizing pda with exchange Avalon Netbooks, PDA and Phones 0 03-02-2009 04:46 PM
Synchronizing time on a domain woody Windows 8 13-09-2005 01:36 AM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright EduGeek.net




website uptime

© 2005 - 2009 EduGeek.net
SERVER: 4
no new posts