Been setting up clustered Hyper V2 VMs today.
Been first time in a while when using Windows Server that I have though that is cool.
As a Linux admin at heart that is hard for me to say
Tim
Been setting up clustered Hyper V2 VMs today.
Been first time in a while when using Windows Server that I have though that is cool.
As a Linux admin at heart that is hard for me to say
Tim
ONE OF US! ONE OF US! ONE OF... *ahem* sorry, got carried away.
Having used previous incarnations of Hyper-V and Virtual Server, I'd agree the new R2 version does feel significantly more polished and mature as a platform.

It's just a shame, when you apparantly have a VT capable process that, you sometimes have to hack Win2k8R2 to allow you to install Virtual Server 2005 R2 SP1 because some hardware manufacturers (mentioning no names (*caugh* HP)) don't bother giving you a BIOS update so you can enable the feature![]()
I had to go through a complicated and largely undocumented BIOS update on an Acer server for the same reason recently. I was not amused.
Hello,
I had some issues getting Hyper-V working on a DL360 G5 recently. To get it to work, I had to do the following:
Install hotfix kb974598
then enable a)Intel® Virtualization Technology and b)No-Memory Execute Protection in the BIOS
If I enabled the above without the hotfix the W2K8 R2 server would BSOD on boot. I hope this might be helpful for someone.
I'm after trying Hyper-V Server R2 (the free one) and as I don't have any spare PC's at home which are 64bit and with VT or whatever hardware it requires I was wondering if I could create a VM in Virtual PC (or VMware player or some kind of destop virtualisation product) and install and play on that?
DAckroyd (11th November 2009)
me thinks it's that time of the week to look for a new mobo, cpu and ram (and probly a PSU)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)