+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
Windows Server 2008 R2 Thread, Windows Server 2012 in Technical; Giddy good god - I was hoping it wouldn't be entirely Windows 8'ised. I was wrong. My NM described it ...
  1. #1

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,482
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 875 Times in 682 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    438

    Windows Server 2012

    Giddy good god - I was hoping it wouldn't be entirely Windows 8'ised.

    I was wrong. My NM described it as "Windows Server CBeebies Edition".

    Closed it before Justin Fletcher popped out on screen, not that I could find the start menu...

  2. Thanks to synaesthesia from:

    speckytecky (2nd June 2012)

  3. #2

    sonofsanta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    4,466
    Thank Post
    750
    Thanked 1,210 Times in 852 Posts
    Blog Entries
    45
    Rep Power
    533
    I read yesterday that it defaults to Metro on boot.

    Because what every sysadmin wants is a fscking touch screen interface when they connect to their server. Of course.

  4. #3

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,482
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 875 Times in 682 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    438
    Still doesn't help when you punch the screen in desperation.

  5. #4

    teejay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,051
    Thank Post
    275
    Thanked 722 Times in 550 Posts
    Rep Power
    326
    Linux and Samba 4 are beginning to look like something worth investigating...

  6. #5

    Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,941
    Thank Post
    232
    Thanked 1,510 Times in 1,206 Posts
    Rep Power
    328
    I think for a server, Metro really is pointless.

    And anyway, I thought by default Windows Server 2012 was GUIless and you have to switch that on too? I think Microsoft are trying to engineer it in such a way that you control the server functions from a workstation (a bit like RSAT), so you don't actually have to touch the server itself.

    If Microsoft want to make Windows Server more secure, they should strip out IE completely and make that optional too.

    Rock on Windows Server 2008 R2

  7. #6
    Frut02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    95
    Thank Post
    3
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    7
    Hmmm i cant see me using this when its released...... starting to investigate linux anyway

  8. #7


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,207
    Thank Post
    218
    Thanked 812 Times in 694 Posts
    Rep Power
    274
    it has no start menu but defaults to desktop metro is basically the start menu

    it has some good stuff

    hyperv has had some good upgrades, storage pools like home server look good and data deduplication. Its less annoying than win8 but i could live without metro yes

  9. #8
    cpjitservices's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Yorkshire
    Posts
    2,148
    Thank Post
    439
    Thanked 236 Times in 215 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    68
    Oh my word.... Metro... on a server... really ? no way am I going down that road!!!!

    Think Ill stick with 2008 R2!

  10. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Huddersfield
    Posts
    55
    Thank Post
    10
    Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Rep Power
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by sonofsanta View Post
    I read yesterday that it defaults to Metro on boot.

    Because what every sysadmin wants is a fscking touch screen interface when they connect to their server. Of course.
    There was originally a GPO to allow it to boot to desktop but ever since the beta Microsoft changed it to only work if you had Desktop experience installed which is pointless.

    The server manager UI is shockingly bad as well.

  11. #10
    gshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,604
    Thank Post
    154
    Thanked 205 Times in 190 Posts
    Rep Power
    64
    Maybe the UI is meant to be deliberately bad so you install the Core-equivalent GUI-less version and remote manage it

  12. #11
    DrCheese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,017
    Thank Post
    96
    Thanked 158 Times in 107 Posts
    Rep Power
    58
    The server manager UI is shockingly bad as well.
    oh god yes, it took me about 10/15 minutes to work out how to dcpromo it. What a mess!

  13. #12

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,482
    Thank Post
    527
    Thanked 875 Times in 682 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    438
    I quickly looked at the Core install of 2008 for hyper-v and nearly decided to learn it. Perhaps I should have. But nm, I intend to be using 2008R2 for a long while yet.

  14. #13

    Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    8,941
    Thank Post
    232
    Thanked 1,510 Times in 1,206 Posts
    Rep Power
    328
    This made me laugh - Microsoft 'feeling really good' about Windows 8... The point is, no one else feels good about it

    The strange thing is, there's so much talk of Windows 8/Windows Server 2012, but nothing on Windows 7 SP2/Windows Server 2008 R2 SP2

  15. #14


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    8,105
    Thank Post
    203
    Thanked 2,383 Times in 1,763 Posts
    Rep Power
    703

  16. #15

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    10,685
    Thank Post
    824
    Thanked 2,570 Times in 2,187 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    731
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    This made me laugh - Microsoft 'feeling really good' about Windows 8... The point is, no one else feels good about it

    The strange thing is, there's so much talk of Windows 8/Windows Server 2012, but nothing on Windows 7 SP2/Windows Server 2008 R2 SP2
    This will probably be specificly because of W8, the SP2 release usually includes a bunch of features to make it work nicely and take advantage of some of the features in the new system. SP2 will probably arrive some time after the RTM of the next server OS.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Windows 8 Server (Server 2012)
    By Dos_Box in forum IT News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2nd September 2011, 01:30 PM
  2. [Windows Software] Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation ?
    By albertwt in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 9th January 2011, 07:47 AM
  3. [Windows Software] Windows Server licensing utilization on VMware ESXi
    By albertwt in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 29th November 2010, 09:48 PM
  4. [Windows Software] Which serial number for deploying unlimited Windows Server VM on Datacenter 2008 ?
    By albertwt in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26th August 2010, 03:49 PM
  5. [Windows Software] Windows Server Virtual Licences
    By Stuart_C in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th March 2010, 05:28 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •