+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
Windows Server 2008 R2 Thread, Windows Server 2012 in Technical; Giddy good god - I was hoping it wouldn't be entirely Windows 8'ised. I was wrong. My NM described it ...
  1. #1

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    6,242
    Thank Post
    603
    Thanked 1,095 Times in 843 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    486

    Windows Server 2012

    Giddy good god - I was hoping it wouldn't be entirely Windows 8'ised.

    I was wrong. My NM described it as "Windows Server CBeebies Edition".

    Closed it before Justin Fletcher popped out on screen, not that I could find the start menu...

  2. Thanks to synaesthesia from:

    speckytecky (2nd June 2012)

  3. #2

    sonofsanta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Lincolnshire, UK
    Posts
    5,137
    Thank Post
    917
    Thanked 1,524 Times in 1,037 Posts
    Blog Entries
    47
    Rep Power
    655
    I read yesterday that it defaults to Metro on boot.

    Because what every sysadmin wants is a fscking touch screen interface when they connect to their server. Of course.

  4. #3

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    6,242
    Thank Post
    603
    Thanked 1,095 Times in 843 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    486
    Still doesn't help when you punch the screen in desperation.

  5. #4

    teejay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    3,213
    Thank Post
    286
    Thanked 778 Times in 588 Posts
    Rep Power
    338
    Linux and Samba 4 are beginning to look like something worth investigating...

  6. #5

    Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    9,266
    Thank Post
    242
    Thanked 1,575 Times in 1,254 Posts
    Rep Power
    341
    I think for a server, Metro really is pointless.

    And anyway, I thought by default Windows Server 2012 was GUIless and you have to switch that on too? I think Microsoft are trying to engineer it in such a way that you control the server functions from a workstation (a bit like RSAT), so you don't actually have to touch the server itself.

    If Microsoft want to make Windows Server more secure, they should strip out IE completely and make that optional too.

    Rock on Windows Server 2008 R2

  7. #6
    Frut02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cambridge
    Posts
    136
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Rep Power
    8
    Hmmm i cant see me using this when its released...... starting to investigate linux anyway

  8. #7


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,815
    Thank Post
    231
    Thanked 888 Times in 763 Posts
    Rep Power
    301
    it has no start menu but defaults to desktop metro is basically the start menu

    it has some good stuff

    hyperv has had some good upgrades, storage pools like home server look good and data deduplication. Its less annoying than win8 but i could live without metro yes

  9. #8
    cpjitservices's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Hessle
    Posts
    2,540
    Thank Post
    524
    Thanked 294 Times in 270 Posts
    Rep Power
    84
    Oh my word.... Metro... on a server... really ? no way am I going down that road!!!!

    Think Ill stick with 2008 R2!

  10. #9

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Huddersfield
    Posts
    55
    Thank Post
    10
    Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Rep Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by sonofsanta View Post
    I read yesterday that it defaults to Metro on boot.

    Because what every sysadmin wants is a fscking touch screen interface when they connect to their server. Of course.
    There was originally a GPO to allow it to boot to desktop but ever since the beta Microsoft changed it to only work if you had Desktop experience installed which is pointless.

    The server manager UI is shockingly bad as well.

  11. #10
    gshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,703
    Thank Post
    172
    Thanked 226 Times in 208 Posts
    Rep Power
    68
    Maybe the UI is meant to be deliberately bad so you install the Core-equivalent GUI-less version and remote manage it

  12. #11
    DrCheese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,035
    Thank Post
    97
    Thanked 161 Times in 110 Posts
    Rep Power
    60
    The server manager UI is shockingly bad as well.
    oh god yes, it took me about 10/15 minutes to work out how to dcpromo it. What a mess!

  13. #12

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    6,242
    Thank Post
    603
    Thanked 1,095 Times in 843 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    486
    I quickly looked at the Core install of 2008 for hyper-v and nearly decided to learn it. Perhaps I should have. But nm, I intend to be using 2008R2 for a long while yet.

  14. #13

    Michael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    9,266
    Thank Post
    242
    Thanked 1,575 Times in 1,254 Posts
    Rep Power
    341
    This made me laugh - Microsoft 'feeling really good' about Windows 8... The point is, no one else feels good about it

    The strange thing is, there's so much talk of Windows 8/Windows Server 2012, but nothing on Windows 7 SP2/Windows Server 2008 R2 SP2

  15. #14


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.403651, -0.515458
    Posts
    9,419
    Thank Post
    243
    Thanked 2,827 Times in 2,086 Posts
    Rep Power
    815

  16. #15

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,241
    Thank Post
    882
    Thanked 2,743 Times in 2,317 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    784
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    This made me laugh - Microsoft 'feeling really good' about Windows 8... The point is, no one else feels good about it

    The strange thing is, there's so much talk of Windows 8/Windows Server 2012, but nothing on Windows 7 SP2/Windows Server 2008 R2 SP2
    This will probably be specificly because of W8, the SP2 release usually includes a bunch of features to make it work nicely and take advantage of some of the features in the new system. SP2 will probably arrive some time after the RTM of the next server OS.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Windows 8 Server (Server 2012)
    By Dos_Box in forum IT News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2nd September 2011, 01:30 PM
  2. [Windows Software] Windows Server 2008 R2 Foundation ?
    By albertwt in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 9th January 2011, 07:47 AM
  3. [Windows Software] Windows Server licensing utilization on VMware ESXi
    By albertwt in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 29th November 2010, 09:48 PM
  4. [Windows Software] Which serial number for deploying unlimited Windows Server VM on Datacenter 2008 ?
    By albertwt in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26th August 2010, 03:49 PM
  5. [Windows Software] Windows Server Virtual Licences
    By Stuart_C in forum Licensing Questions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th March 2010, 05:28 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •