Windows Server 2008 R2 Thread, DFS - Can this work? in Technical; Let's say we have two servers, 1 & 2.
Server 1 has a H: drive which hosts all staff accounts ...
29th March 2011, 11:10 AM #1
DFS - Can this work?
Let's say we have two servers, 1 & 2.
Server 1 has a H: drive which hosts all staff accounts and some student accounts.
Server 2 has a H: drive which hosts the rest of the student accounts.
Is it possible to set up DFS so that when I browse to \\DOMAIN.internal\\DFSRoot\ it will show all the folders from server 1 and server 2, in one location.
Is that what DFS does, or do I have the wrong idea of it? I don't want the files to be replicated from one server to the next, just a location that is a 'shortcut' if you like to all the files/folders on both servers.
I'll explain why I want this for better understanding. I have a GPO which redirects AppData. I can't put in the redirection entry "\\server1\AppData\%username%" because the accounts on server 2 will not work properly then. So I thought by being able to put "\\DOMAIN.internal\DFSRoot\AppData\%username%" it will find the correct server for where those files are.
Is this not how DFS works? Or have I got the wrong end of the stick?
IDG Tech News
29th March 2011, 11:19 AM #2
It should do exactly that, yes. You don't have to have replication enabled to do that.
29th March 2011, 11:20 AM #3
You'd be better in the group policy for the appdate folder redirection using the advanced option to specify different locations by user group. For us, we seperate the student by year group, makes it much easier to manage rather than having all the redirected folders in one folder on the server.
So you'd have something like:
29th March 2011, 11:20 AM #4
DFS causes all replication partners to have identical copies of the data on their DFS shares. It's not a mix; they are identical. If a file is added, changed or deleted in one of the replication partners, this change is peculated through the system to the other partners.
DFS in 2008 uses block-level replication which is much more efficient that pre-2008 (which had to copy a whole file even if 1 bit changed).
You might be thinking of the Libraries function?
29th March 2011, 11:20 AM #5
yup. can do that!. \\server\namespace then add server1 and server2 as folder targets
29th March 2011, 11:23 AM #6
No it doesn't. DFS and FRS can be used independently or together - you don't have to have replication if you don't want to.
Originally Posted by jinnantonnixx
29th March 2011, 11:30 AM #7
I've tried adding a namespace, and then a new folder called Staff. The staff folder has targets of \\S1\Staff and \\S2\Staff, but when I browse to DOMAIN.Internal\DFSRoot I only see the folders that are present on S1, not those that are on S2.
29th March 2011, 11:39 AM #8
If your not using replication, then the folders have to be different names to see them both. if you are using replication then the local computer will connect to one of them and the data replicates to the other and if the connection failes it will start using the other one.
31st March 2011, 01:23 AM #9
sorry to hijack the thread but its pretty much on topic.
Each of us in the IT Dept has a c:\ISO folder where I keep the latest MS volume license images. At the moment, I manually update each of our folders. This is tedious. We all run 2008R2 as our daily workstations.
Would I use DFS with file replication to be able to have each workstation have its own local copy of the ISOs, but they would automatically update whenever I downloaded a new ISO into my local ISO folder?
(never Used dfs, just stumbled upon this thread which made me think)
31st March 2011, 04:50 AM #10
I don't think it can work on workstations. TBH it'd be quicker to use a xcopy script or one of the many file replication tools out there.
Originally Posted by RabbieBurns
You can't merge 2 files from different servers as the OP wants to do... windows wouldn't be able to cope with 2 folders potentially with the same name. If you set them up as a replica then you will have a copy of everything on each server. Windows should (depending how you set it up) spread the load accross the servers. This would make reads quicker (because it's only accessing 1 server) but writes slower - because windows is having to communcate with another server to update the replica.
31st March 2011, 04:52 AM #11
We all run 2008R2 as our daily workstations.
31st March 2011, 05:17 AM #12
Then yes, it would work.
Originally Posted by RabbieBurns
Thanks to eean from:
RabbieBurns (31st March 2011)
31st March 2011, 06:01 AM #13
Having never used it before Im trying to find some sort of how-to guide.. but I cant seem to find a technet doc or anyththing about how to set it up..
anyone got any beginnsers guides to DFS?
31st March 2011, 09:03 AM #14
Any specific reason you're running 2008R2 on your workstations? sounds like a waste of licensing money to me. and why not just have one ISO folder and share it?
31st March 2011, 09:18 AM #15
because they are quite powerfull machines (6 core with 16gb ram, 2tb raid 10) and we use them as our hyperv testbed cluster amongst other things.
By wickit in forum Windows
Last Post: 1st March 2011, 11:16 AM
By speckytecky in forum Internet Related/Filtering/Firewall
Last Post: 12th October 2010, 04:35 PM
By Gatt in forum Windows Server 2008
Last Post: 6th August 2009, 01:40 PM
By boomam in forum Windows Server 2008
Last Post: 23rd June 2009, 03:19 PM
By techie211 in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
Last Post: 28th April 2009, 10:35 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)