Windows Server 2000/2003 Thread, DNS / DHCP - Since the holidays - DNS all wrong !!! Scavenging not working in Technical; Can anyone please help. I thought we had DNS working perfectly, but after the 6 weeks holiday i have noticed ...
-
20th September 2011, 02:04 PM #1 DNS / DHCP - Since the holidays - DNS all wrong !!! Scavenging not working
Can anyone please help. I thought we had DNS working perfectly, but after the 6 weeks holiday i have noticed that around 40% of the computer in DNS have the incorrect IP.
I have followed several guides and noticed that our outdated timestamped DNS entries arent being scavenged. I have set scavenging in the 3 places suggested:
The DNS server - "Automatic Scavenging of stale records" enabled and set to 7 days
The Zone - "Scavenge Stale Resource records" enabled, No-Refresh interval set to 3 days. Refresh interval set to 3 days.
DHCP has the Lease Duration set to 3 days.
I have DNS records with the dates of May 2011. I have tried to tell DNS to scavenge records now but i get the 2052 error.
I can only see one 2051 log of scavenging report from back in Jan 2011 and nothing has been touched since then.?
Can anyone please advice their working dates and times or suggest a solution for me?
Thanks in advance!
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
20th September 2011, 05:19 PM #2 Is no-one prepared to share their No-Refresh/Refresh-Interval/DNS Scavenging age/DHCP lease durations with me
-
-
20th September 2011, 05:26 PM #3
-
-
20th September 2011, 05:44 PM #4 Cheers Geoff,
That was the main guide that I followed... I have just re-read and noticed that on one of the screenshots:
image_4.png
He has "Update Assosiated Pointer (PTR) Record" ticked for his DNS records.
Does everyone else have this enabled on each of there DNS records??
-
-
21st September 2011, 09:12 AM #5 
Originally Posted by
burgemaster
He has "Update Assosiated Pointer (PTR) Record" ticked for his DNS records.
Does everyone else have this enabled on each of there DNS records??
That's only for equipment that doesn't do it itself (printers for example). However Windows 7 doesn't seem to do it either sometimes. This seems to be down to a client side setting. Have a read of this.
Windows 7 & Reverse Lookup DNS Registration | ADdict
-
Thanks to Geoff from:
burgemaster (23rd September 2011)
-
21st September 2011, 09:17 AM #6 My Leases are set to 8 hours. and DHCP is setup to register the DNS of each client when it is issued an address. and also delete the a and pointer records when the lease has expired.
to look at these options right click on the scope and open the properties then look at the DNS tab
-
Thanks to glennda from:
burgemaster (23rd September 2011)
-
30th September 2011, 12:13 PM #7 AT LAST !!!!!! 
Event Type: Information
Event Source: DNS
Event Category: None
Event ID: 2501
Time: 11:40:40
User: N/A
Computer: XX2
Description:
The DNS server has completed a scavenging cycle:
Visited Zones = 5,
Visited Nodes = 1155,
Scavenged Nodes = 642,
Scavenged Records = 721.
This cycle took 0 seconds.
The next scavenging cycle is scheduled to run in 168 hours.
-
-
30th September 2011, 01:27 PM #8 So, what was wrong?
-
-
30th September 2011, 02:37 PM #9 It wasnt enabled on the actual DC itself, and then i guess i was being impatient!
image_12.png
-
Thanks to burgemaster from:
Edwardjr (14th March 2012)
-
14th March 2012, 10:33 AM #10 Just had this problem myself! Was right clicking on the DC and selecting the Set Aging but never noticed the option in the properties menu!
-
-
14th March 2012, 11:01 PM #11 if my dhcp leases are 12 hours, what refresh intervals should I be using?
-
-
15th March 2012, 10:41 AM #12 Best practice is that the refresh interval should be set to half the lease length. So in your case 6 hours.
-
Thanks to Geoff from:
RabbieBurns (15th March 2012)
-
15th March 2012, 10:08 PM #13 
Originally Posted by
Geoff
Best practice is that the refresh interval should be set to half the lease length.
Why are the MS defaults still DHCP:8 days, and 7 days for the refresh intervals though? I'm convinced both intervals should be smaller than the lease. Not sure about the scavenging interval here i.e. how frequently to scavenge DNS.
Personally I hate scavenging because it's a serious kludge, and at this kind of turnover might consider: a) Getting DHCP to register and delete all the DNS records, b) Do something else to clean out the dynamic-registered DNS records overnight (you can make clever scripts etc. to do that).
I'm also wondering how much of an effect this has on AD size: Does it get big (if so how much bigger) because there are lots and lots of deleted/tombstoned DNS records hanging around?
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By Little-Miss in forum General Chat
Replies: 22
Last Post: 28th October 2008, 10:17 AM
-
By Jake in forum MIS Systems
Replies: 3
Last Post: 9th September 2008, 06:23 PM
-
By tosca925 in forum Windows
Replies: 7
Last Post: 17th May 2007, 11:42 PM
-
By sqdge in forum General Chat
Replies: 42
Last Post: 13th April 2007, 10:12 PM
-
By NetworkGeezer in forum Wireless Networks
Replies: 6
Last Post: 13th February 2007, 02:13 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules