+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Windows Server 2000/2003 Thread, efficiency of shares in Technical; Is it more efficient to have 1 share that has 10 subdirectories or share each subdirectory out individually ??? Ta ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    51
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    14

    efficiency of shares

    Is it more efficient to have 1 share that has 10 subdirectories
    or share each subdirectory out individually

    ???

    Ta

    M

  2. #2


    tom_newton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,491
    Thank Post
    868
    Thanked 855 Times in 675 Posts
    Rep Power
    197
    Would suggest you won't see much difference - except in administration overhead for 10 shares!

    What are you trying to achieve?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,158
    Thank Post
    116
    Thanked 529 Times in 452 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    124
    There were issues with earlier versions of Windows when you had lots (>1000 I think) shares but those have now gone.

    From a management point of view one share is easier but clients may make a difference. Windows clients can easily connect to \\server\share\folder so if you have only got Windows clients then I'd go with that. If you've got Linux or Mac clients they're much less good at this so you really need lots of separate shares.

  4. #4
    DrPerceptron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    932
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 135 Times in 115 Posts
    Rep Power
    42
    Especially for students, having multiple shares prevents them seeing things they shouldn't see - if they can't see them, they can't be tempted by them.

  5. #5

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    16,321
    Thank Post
    902
    Thanked 1,801 Times in 1,550 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    467
    I have one share with sub folders

    For example the share would be called "home areas" with the home areas inside. Its more tidy that way

  6. #6
    OverWorked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    N. Yorks
    Posts
    1,025
    Thank Post
    201
    Thanked 42 Times in 34 Posts
    Rep Power
    30
    I'd second that. Security is easier to manage with separate shares.

  7. #7

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    16,321
    Thank Post
    902
    Thanked 1,801 Times in 1,550 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    467
    Plus when you create a user account it will only create a home area automatically if it is a sub folder of a share

  8. #8

    powdarrmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Alcester, Warwickshire
    Posts
    4,867
    Thank Post
    412
    Thanked 778 Times in 651 Posts
    Rep Power
    182
    Personally, I prefer one share for home directories and one for profiles, but my boss prefers multiple shares. A lot of it is preference: I like the neatness, automatic management and inheriting permissions.

  9. #9
    Mr.Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    A Pirate Ship
    Posts
    942
    Thank Post
    182
    Thanked 158 Times in 126 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    65
    I only have 7 unique Shares. Even though the kids get more than one, they are hidden.

    My Shares are :
    Programs (Program Data) - Hidden from Everyone
    Environment (Profiles, Start Menus and Redirected Desktops) - Hidden From Everyone
    PupilShare
    StaffShare (Not mapped on the Kids accounts)
    SIMS (Staff Only)
    School Fund - Only a Share because it wouldn't work as a subfolder!
    Documents - Two Subfolders, 1 Staff, 1 Students, Each has their own directory within it which is mapped to H:\ on login.

    I can't see why you would need many more? - After the Share use NTFS permissions to assign rights to certain groups for Subfolders (like OfficeDocs)
    Last edited by Mr. Ben; 16th June 2009 at 10:34 AM.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Folder Shares
    By tian in forum Windows
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 9th June 2009, 12:51 PM
  2. How do you "measure" staff/dept efficiency?
    By GlennT in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6th June 2009, 09:13 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 16th May 2009, 08:38 PM
  4. itunes shares
    By Liam_uk in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 6th November 2008, 01:26 PM
  5. stocks and shares
    By russdev in forum Other Stuff
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25th August 2005, 06:25 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •