Windows 8 Thread, Deploying Windows 8.x Apps with Group Policy in Technical; Originally Posted by jamesbmarshall
This doesn't sound like a good idea.
Aside from any potential licensing issues this may or ...
5th June 2014, 01:15 PM #16
Which makes it doubly sad that it is required in the first place to make the devices usable with metro apps, what's the other option, 600 years of manual creation and meddling with liveIDs or reimaging every device every time you want a new app.
Originally Posted by jamesbmarshall
I like the tech, but its like there was no thought put into anything other than the marketing agenda and its a long road back to a usable system.
5th June 2014, 01:15 PM #17
This just proves why Windows 8 or Windows 8.1 just isn't fit for education or business.
Do Microsoft realise how many apps we have installed on iPads? Literally hundreds and this can be cloned and restored accordingly.
On Windows 7 workstations, most images I work on have approx. 50 or more applications installed as standard. Why is there any limit at all, it's illogical by design.
5th June 2014, 01:58 PM #18
It's alright for education and businesses with BYOD schemes where the user logs in with their own Microsoft account.
Originally Posted by Michael
5th June 2014, 02:06 PM #19
I agree, but we all know education doesn't always use it as was designed by Apple or Microsoft.
Originally Posted by Arthur
It reminds me of the silly requirement whereby you can only Sysprep Windows 7 so many times, but then Microsoft have done away with any limit with Windows 8.
If Microsoft insist on setting limits when deploying an image, then it should be minimum 100 apps in my opinion. Otherwise (in Microsoft's thinking), you have a beautiful new OS, but few applications to run on it. What's the point?
5th June 2014, 02:17 PM #20
And generally their own device, sorry MS we don't all live in the US where you can buy a tablet for three dollars fifty. Here and I'm sure there, in the poorer areas there is no way the families could afford that. The other route is school owned BYOD which is not really BYOD anymore and the funding for that does not exist unless, like Google here you have a charity that backs them and works out a big hire purchase deal for Chromebooks.
Originally Posted by Arthur
If MS is going for this model they have already all but lost it. Every school that has done 1:1 around here that I know of has gone chromebooks, the hardware is junk, the OS is slow but they are manageable and thanks to that and some - I'm sure - 'scrupulous' dealing with the MoE and its OSS zealot advisors GAPS and chromebooks rule here.
We have gone 365 in several schools and are trying to go for the MS tablets - as they are faster, more varied uses, better integration with existing systems - but it is a loosing battle, GAPS now has Classrooms for free where as you need to build everything from scratch in sharepoint on 365. They have chromebooks that can be managed for all apps and can login to their school account rather than having to create a separate liveID for every student if we wanted even free apps.
12th September 2014, 03:43 PM #21
- Rep Power
That doesn't work at least not when I tried. The App checks back to see if it is licensed and fails the licensing check
Originally Posted by ColinP
By mmholland in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
Last Post: 28th August 2012, 04:15 PM
By DaveP in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
Last Post: 24th July 2012, 02:37 PM
By Arthur in forum Windows 8
Last Post: 4th November 2011, 01:19 PM
By jlucas in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
Last Post: 15th June 2010, 04:01 PM
By garym2000 in forum Windows
Last Post: 19th February 2008, 08:18 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)