+ Post New Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 59 of 59
Windows 7 Thread, Performance Scores of your Windows 7 RTM Machines in Technical; no... 7200RPM SATA disks produce 5.9 10000RPM SAS disks produce 6.3 15000RPM SAS disks produce 6.7 Not tried SSD though...
  1. #46

    nephilim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    7,362
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thank Post
    921
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 791 Posts
    Rep Power
    448
    no...

    7200RPM SATA disks produce 5.9
    10000RPM SAS disks produce 6.3
    15000RPM SAS disks produce 6.7

    Not tried SSD though

  2. IDG Tech News

  3. #47
    jamesfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    1,408
    Thank Post
    62
    Thanked 165 Times in 159 Posts
    Rep Power
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by nephilim View Post
    no...

    7200RPM SATA disks produce 5.9
    10000RPM SAS disks produce 6.3
    15000RPM SAS disks produce 6.7

    Not tried SSD though
    Thats odd because my 10,000 WD VelociRaptor drive is only scoring 5.9 - my OCZ SSD gets 7.4 though

  4. #48

    nephilim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    7,362
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thank Post
    921
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 791 Posts
    Rep Power
    448
    is your velociraptor SAS or SATA? as that does make a difference when it comes to non SSD drives

  5. #49
    DMcCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Isle of Wight
    Posts
    3,085
    Thank Post
    9
    Thanked 396 Times in 342 Posts
    Rep Power
    91
    Processor: 7.6
    Memory: 7.7
    Graphics: 7.8
    Gaming graphics: 7.8
    Primary HD: 7.3

    Overall 7.3

    Currently:
    i7 960
    12GB 1333 DDR3
    ATI 5870
    Corsair 128GB SSD

  6. #50
    jamesfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    1,408
    Thank Post
    62
    Thanked 165 Times in 159 Posts
    Rep Power
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by nephilim View Post
    is your velociraptor SAS or SATA? as that does make a difference when it comes to non SSD drives
    SATA so I guess that makes sense

  7. #51


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    3,845
    Thank Post
    149
    Thanked 1,228 Times in 924 Posts
    Rep Power
    305
    What would be quite interesting is if people also posted their disk sub-scores (especially if you have an SSD or SAS disk). My SSD gets an overall disk score of 7.7 with the following sub-scores...

    Code:
    Average Throughput
    Sequential Read    7.5    253.50583 MB/s, ioSize = 65536, 3,868 IOs/sec
    Random Read        7.7    195.28000 MB/s, ioSize = 16384, 11,918 IOs/sec
    
    Responsiveness
    Average IO Rate    7.9    0.98000 ms/IO
    Grouped IOs        7.3    9.24807 units
    Long IOs           7.9    2.49660 units
    Overall            7.7    23.08870 units
    
    Cap Passed         FALSE

    The sub-scores can be found under "Disk Metrics" in the most recent "Disk.Assessment (Recent).WinSAT.xml" file located in %SystemRoot%\Performance\WinSAT\DataStore. You can also check if the score of your HDD is capped.

  8. Thanks to Arthur from:

    john (19th October 2010)

  9. #52

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    9
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    0
    If I want to upgrade my hard drive I'm better spending the money on an SSD rather than a velociraptor drive, would you agree?

  10. #53

    nephilim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bedfordshire
    Posts
    7,362
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thank Post
    921
    Thanked 1,034 Times in 791 Posts
    Rep Power
    448
    by far

  11. #54
    Obzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    12
    Thank Post
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0


    Need an SSD me thinks

  12. #55
    Unvalidated User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    13
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Processor: i7 950
    RAM: 12GB 1600Mhz Tri
    Gfx: ATi 6850
    Primary Disk: SSD SATA2

  13. #56

    SYSMAN_MK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Milton Keynes
    Posts
    3,825
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thank Post
    433
    Thanked 1,175 Times in 669 Posts
    Rep Power
    329
    Here is my updated score after a few upgrades.


  14. #57
    chrisbrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    103
    Thank Post
    2
    Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    12
    My new PC
    i7 2600 (3.4GHz, 4 cores)
    GA-P67A-UD4
    6GB RAM
    1TB 7200rpm Samsung
    ATi HD6870


  15. #58
    mrbios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Stroud, Gloucestershire
    Posts
    1,483
    Thank Post
    178
    Thanked 141 Times in 115 Posts
    Rep Power
    61
    Get a 64GB crucial C300 as a boot drive in that beastie chrisbrown boost that hdd score up to 7.9

    Curious though, what made you go with a gigabyte board? No UEFI Also don't want to be picky but 6GB of ram a bit of an odd number for a dual channel machine?

  16. #59
    chrisbrown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    103
    Thank Post
    2
    Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    12
    mrbios - I was on a fairly strict budget and the UD4 seemed to present the best bang for my buck.
    And the disk performance is perfectly acceptable...I'm not *overly* concerned about how this thing scores.

    Manages CS:Source that I play at 300fps.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Performance Scores of your Win7 RC 1 Machines
    By garethedmondson in forum Windows 7
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 28th February 2012, 04:35 PM
  2. Windows 7 RTM
    By jsnetman in forum Windows
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21st August 2009, 10:06 AM
  3. Windows 7 RTM Now on TechNet and MSDN!
    By Gatt in forum Windows 7
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 20th August 2009, 03:46 PM
  4. Windows 7, poor performance
    By Quackers in forum Windows 7
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 17th June 2009, 08:47 AM
  5. Performance manager on windows 2003
    By ranj in forum Windows
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31st January 2007, 12:52 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •