+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
vBCms Comments Thread, Article: BSF - The James Review in ; You can view the page at http://www.edugeek.net/content.php?r...e-James-Review...
  1. #1

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    10,396
    Thank Post
    601
    Thanked 2,171 Times in 994 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    630

    Article: BSF - The James Review


  2. #2

    beeswax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,285
    Thank Post
    285
    Thanked 225 Times in 153 Posts
    Rep Power
    131
    Wasn't part of the BSF remit, at least in the early days, to produce buildings of note, which would reflect well on the surrounding area (not the exact wording, I know)? I think it was becoming obvious by about Wave 5 that in order to save costs schools would be more limited in the designs they could choose.

  3. #3

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    10,396
    Thank Post
    601
    Thanked 2,171 Times in 994 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    630
    Yes, but at massive costs. A sensible idea would have been to centrally contract an architect and draw up plans for a modular school where there would be a choice of say 5 teaching block types, sports halls and other essential school rooms/buildings and then schools could pick or choose the designs they wanted. It would have kept design, material and building fees to a minimum that way whilst still giving schools a good choice of features and design. Many BSF designs I saw were very ambitious, extremley expensive, and definately not in keeping with the surrounding area!

  4. #4
    Gibbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Cheshire
    Posts
    905
    Thank Post
    207
    Thanked 344 Times in 238 Posts
    Rep Power
    93
    Many BSF schools are now struggling with operational costs. This is a good example:

    Business Academy Bexley may be forced to cut staff over £500,000 deficit | News

    One of the Government's flagship academies is facing staff cuts after running up a £500,000 deficit.

    The Business Academy Bexley has spent almost £300,000 fixing leaks, flaking steelwork and broken boilers in the £31 million Norman Foster-designed building.

  5. #5

    beeswax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,285
    Thank Post
    285
    Thanked 225 Times in 153 Posts
    Rep Power
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Dos_Box View Post
    Yes, but at massive costs. A sensible idea would have been to centrally contract an architect and draw up plans for a modular school where there would be a choice of say 5 teaching block types, sports halls and other essential school rooms/buildings and then schools could pick or choose the designs they wanted. It would have kept design, material and building fees to a minimum that way whilst still giving schools a good choice of features and design. Many BSF designs I saw were very ambitious, extremley expensive, and definately not in keeping with the surrounding area!
    I can't disagree with that summary, and it made sense to follow this principle even in the first wave. Solutions to problems uncovered with the first new builds could then be incorporated into subsequent plans. It may be that I felt the report was stating the obvious when it said that made-to-measure designs were prohibitivley expensive and over budget, and the modular approach, in hindsight, was the cheaper option. The initial
    brief was for 'statement' architecture. Perhaps the obvious needed stating in the report.
    Not having seen too many new builds, I don't feel able to comment on their harmony with the surrounding area.

  6. #6

    Dos_Box's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Preston, Lancashire
    Posts
    10,396
    Thank Post
    601
    Thanked 2,171 Times in 994 Posts
    Blog Entries
    23
    Rep Power
    630
    Quote Originally Posted by Gibbo View Post
    Many BSF schools are now struggling with operational costs. This is a good example:

    Business Academy Bexley may be forced to cut staff over £500,000 deficit | News
    Academies are different to BSF schools are they not? Different funding model IIRC.

    Edited to add that the Business Academy Bexley was opened in 2003, way before BSF started rolling, and it's reported problems are nothing to do with BSF.
    Last edited by Dos_Box; 12th April 2011 at 03:00 PM.

  7. #7
    DrCheese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,028
    Thank Post
    97
    Thanked 158 Times in 107 Posts
    Rep Power
    58
    He recommended that new buildings should be based on a set of "standardised drawings"
    Finally someone with sense. It was such an hilarious waste of money to hire in different architects for every school, most who seemed to care about the "art" of it than the actual purpose. Not saying every school should look the same but I really doubt someone in York would care if their school looked like a school down in portsmouth.

  8. #8

    matt40k's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ipswich
    Posts
    4,408
    Thank Post
    368
    Thanked 639 Times in 521 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by DrCheese View Post
    Finally someone with sense. It was such an hilarious waste of money to hire in different architects for every school, most who seemed to care about the "art" of it than the actual purpose. Not saying every school should look the same but I really doubt someone in York would care if their school looked like a school down in portsmouth.
    Could you image installing a Schools sharepoint\moodle\joomla template then having to select your school building from the 1 of 5 images of the original designs.

  9. #9

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    9,935
    Thank Post
    1,341
    Thanked 1,784 Times in 1,107 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    595
    The report is quite comprehensive in the breakdown of problems, but has to summarise some of them and it means some of the detail is missed.

    Although ICT is mentioned in a number of areas a common theme that is expressed is that all capital investment needs maintenance and to be refreshed when appropriate. This is expected to be done, in principal, via revenue budgets for smaller amounts and DFC for larger amounts to a certain level. This means that the school should be able to quantify, if asked, how much it expects to have to pay each year for maintenance or refresh of the ICT infrastructure and facilities. It is hard to pin down whether software or 'changeable' assets could be included in here ... that could be a good discussion over a pint some time in the future.

    Here are a couple of key things for you though ... (mainly centred around part 2, but in particular 4.23 to 4.29)

    The report talks about how local choice around building design (and this also means IT infrastructure) has often been a hold up, has meant that value for money hasn't been achieved, that what was requested to be delivered by the leading person (eg the head) could be wasted as that person could have moved on by the time it is delivered.

    The report also recommends that RBCs still exist, that they are changed to a more 'price book' style service where you only pay for what you want / need, 10Mpbs for primary schools and 100Mbps for secondary schools, that there should be more use and development of the existing public sector networks to make use of the existing investment as a way of delivering lots of services (including things such as BDUK). It also suggests that being a small school does not mean you use less bandwidth. in fact you might use more as you make more use of online resources to support the lack of specialisms/expertise within the school, and making more use of hosted solutions / services.

    The ICT Services Framework should play a large part in any procurement, as should other large scale purchasing arrangements. Putting it bluntly, this means that for every chunk of kit you buy then you must check it against the same costs from BuyingSolutions. The only way the system will work is if people make use of it, and if they find they don't get the best price from BuyingSolutions then they feed that back.

    Other recommendations can also be seen that there should be central advice and procurement, and when that comes to the ICT section of new / rebuilt / refurbished schools, this should be for infrastructure only. It does not say what it considers to be infrastructure though...

    So ... Managed services should not be a pre-requisite of any new building scheme, that the choice of desktop / systems should be down to the school, that there should be a plan to maintain IT infrastructure / assets and refresh it. On the flip side, the ICT services framework (which includes managed services) should be a serious option for all schools when they are considering how to spend their capital investment and how to maintain it. There is nothing wrong with schools have the same basic setup and then fine-tuning ... having one person defining a vision or system is a risk ...

    One thing is clear though, there is a push to have more of a centralised role from a body. that can be DoE, it could be PfS ... but the DoE has now taken on board the remnants of Becta. It has the infrastructure team and the safeguarding team, amongst others. The thing we don't have yet is how the DoE is going to deliver their chunk of the Govt's IT Strategy. This report *will* contribute to that.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    102
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
    Rep Power
    23
    I used to work in a PFI school, built using PFI money the LA took out, before Tony Blair and BSF. The authority built or refurbished just under 20 at the same time and put in place a management company who had to maintain the buildings for a set period before they reverted back to LA control. The buildings were leased to a joint venture company for the period, they awarded the contract for building management which included catering, caretaking, facilities management etc, this was a bit similar to a LEP. This 'LEP' had board members from the LA and from the company who provided the capital investment. The building management company was a subsidiary of the group of companies that invested the money. The company that won the contract to build the school was also part of the same group!

    All in all we ended up with a steel frame building with thermalite walls and brick exterior. The LA liked it as the costs were fixed and written into a contract, schools were not so keen as site staff were employed by a third party.

    Pros:
    costs were tried to be kept at a minimum, the buildings all had the same 'feel' but didnt look the same at all.
    yearly energy costs were fixed, well they rose with inflation, irrespective the actual amount of energy used, eg the 1500 pupil school I worked at paid £17500 per year for gas and electricity even if we left computers on 24x7.
    If something goes wrong with the building they have to fix it no cost to school, only exception is vandalism

    Cons:
    any work has a 10% fee to cover management costs and lifecycle
    no way to prove best value as all changes to building and infrastructure are handled by management company

    This idea of building modular schools is surely not a new one, in my LA there are several schools built at the same time in the 60s. They were square modules a bit like more permanent port-a-cabins with flat roofs brick bases and wooden sides. I have seen these modular buildings up and down the country but never seen two identical schools. I think the idea of having a catalogue of modules to choose from is a good idea, but with the option of changing some parts at a cost? This allows for standardisation, but to keep some individuality.

    The school where I now work was due to be rebuilt under BSF and already had plans drawn up, our phase was canceled. The school is in desperate need of rebuilding with no hope of that in the short to mid term now. The LA has allocated Capital Investment for refurb in a couple of years but the amount, although substantial, is not what it needs to be.

    The whole point of BSF was to build innovative, fit for purpuse, modern buildings which were designed from the offset with education in mind. Where learning spaces were built that allowed students to learn differently. The problem as always with large contracts is that project management, something the government should know lots about having created PRINCE(2), yet all government projects go over budget and or over time. We firstly need to ensure that we employ good project managers who in turn should seek the best value for the project as a whole?

  11. Thanks to jayemm from:

    beeswax (15th April 2011)

  12. #11

    m25man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Romford, Essex
    Posts
    1,626
    Thank Post
    49
    Thanked 460 Times in 336 Posts
    Rep Power
    140
    Nothing to do with BSF but I recently got asked to look over some plans for a new school extension.

    The plans were complete and approved.

    3 compartment trunking to be installed in the main hall only along with a projection screen.

    Not a single piece of data cable to seen anywhere, no high level power, no room for data cabinets and not a mention of how the services would be brought in from next door!

    An emergency meeting was called where I addressed the governors and architects.

    Asking for a fibre duct from next door, 30+ Data Outlets, Projector and electric screen, Power outlets, Data Cabinet, Wifi etc...

    It was as though I had just spouted a stream of obscenities and personal insults!
    How dare I question the judgement and integrity of the Architects and Builders..... What do I know about building a modern school......

    A week later I have a revised set of plans and a request for a Bill of Materials from the builders!

  13. #12

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    9,935
    Thank Post
    1,341
    Thanked 1,784 Times in 1,107 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    595
    @jayemm whilst the Govt had done a good thing with the creation of PRINCE2, not all people involved in Govt projects understand it. You will often find the presumption that the Project manager needs to know about it, some of the team leaders need to as well, but the project sponsor / exec/ supporter / customer, the Senior user and Senior Supplier sometimes don't ... or if they do then they are happy to introduce project creep / scope creep and dump it on the Project manager to sort out.

    The other problem is that political and operational decisions are frequently made which can screw over 6 months worth of work ... in one day!

    The only reason I got into project management was to make sure I didn't make any mistakes as the Customer or Senior User, so I could spot a Project manager who was blagging and so I could do the QA.

  14. #13
    nicholab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    1,493
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 97 Times in 93 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    50
    They should have use prefabricated building as these are much cheaper and weather does not get in the way as they are build in a factory.

  15. #14

    GrumbleDook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Gosport, Hampshire
    Posts
    9,935
    Thank Post
    1,341
    Thanked 1,784 Times in 1,107 Posts
    Blog Entries
    19
    Rep Power
    595
    One of the problems is that although some folk strongly believe that you can teach anywhere (which you can when you have good teachers) there is also really strong evidence that the environment can make a massive difference too. The chosen range of designs needs to be based around what is educationally suitable ... not just what is cheapest to throw together.

  16. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    102
    Thank Post
    4
    Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
    Rep Power
    23
    @GrumbleDook yes I do tend to agree. But are we talking about evidence between a 60/70 year old school with single glazing and leaky roofs to a nice new shiny building in pastel colours but which basically just provides the same square rooms for people to use. Or are we talking about comparing newly built schools which are modeled on the old ones to the blue sky thinking of creative open learning spaces, outdoor classrooms and thinking beyond the 'box'?

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. BSF resurrected by Spending review?
    By TheCrust in forum BSF
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23rd October 2010, 04:04 PM
  2. BSF Election review
    By monkeyx in forum BSF
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 5th January 2010, 08:08 AM
  3. Salford BSF under review
    By Gatt in forum BSF
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 26th November 2009, 05:43 PM
  4. Computing has new BSF article.
    By GrumbleDook in forum BSF
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11th June 2009, 03:19 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •