+ Post New Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 64 of 64
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Best way forward - Virtulisation in Technical; Originally Posted by dhicks SANs are, in general, more suited to larger setups (probably half a dozen or more processing ...
  1. #61
    zag is online now
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Thank Post
    Thanked 422 Times in 355 Posts
    Blog Entries
    Rep Power
    Quote Originally Posted by dhicks View Post
    SANs are, in general, more suited to larger setups (probably half a dozen or more processing nodes), just because it takes some economics of scale to make them worthwhile - decent speed / latency connections between VMs and their virtual harddrives (i.e. preferablly fibre channel) and failover (i.e. preferably mirrored SAN hardware). For the average school (or, indeed, small business) setup I'd aim to use local storage on each processing node. You can have instant failover by real-time mirroring volumes between physical machines - set the machines up in pairs, preferably in different physical locations for extra security, and have them mirror each other's virtual machine volumes. In the past I've used Xen and DRBD for this, and this is my current home server setup, and it can allow for good instant-recovery abilities.

    However, in my experience, most schools and smaller businesses don't actually need proper, millisecond-response failover. Sudden, unexpected, catastophic hardware failure should, hopefully, be very rare, and a few minutes of downtime while you boot up VMs on another machine are generally perfectly acceptable. This gets rid of the need for real-time mirroring of virtual machine images in exchange for taking regular backup snapshots instead and having those snapshots exported to a different storage volume. This is also rather easier to set up as a proper backup solution, with previous versions of virtual machine images available in case of disaster or configuration problems.

    I'd use that Dell R510 as your main VM host, hosting your Domain Controller, print server, MIS server and general applications server(s) on local storage. Give the R310 an equal amount of local storage and have it regularly take backup snapshots from the R510 (have the R310 host another domain controller, though, don't take images of the first domain controller, DCs don't restore well from image backups as they use a lot of time-sensitive data). You can host as many extra VMs as you can fit on, although you might want to bear in mind that if one machine conks out one day you'll want to be able to run a minimally functional system on one machine.

    Use one of your other servers as a dedicated file server for user files - we've found FreeNAS to work well, with a nice, GUI-based interface and support for ZFS. Bear in mind that ZFS' best feature, block-level deduplication, takes a lot of RAM - your file server might need 8GB or more of RAM and a decent processor to make best use of ZFS. Have another dedicated server, with at least 1.5 times the file server's storage size, as a backup for the file server, with regular snapshots or backups available so users can get to previous versions of files.
    Anyone considering a new virtualization setup should read that and be pretty much ready to go.

    Excellent advice.

  2. #62
    AButters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Thank Post
    Thanked 107 Times in 82 Posts
    Rep Power
    Quote Originally Posted by pantscat View Post
    Oddly I find our print server doesn't really have much of an IOPS issue. Just SIMS...<spits!>
    Fit more RAM. SQL can cache the entire SIMS DB in RAM and just write the changes to disk. Speeds up SIMS no end. My SIMS VM barely reads and writes.


  3. #63

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Thank Post
    Thanked 115 Times in 105 Posts
    Rep Power
    I'll just point back to the LSI Switched SAS idea - it kinda makes a SAN out of your MSA60s and SAS HBAs in your virtual hosts.

    6Gb/s SAS Switch

    Should work out cheaper than a full on SAN, and give you failover capability. I've yet to test this out, but have had various reports of it working with virtual environments.



  4. #64

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Thank Post
    Thanked 115 Times in 105 Posts
    Rep Power
    Quote Originally Posted by AButters View Post
    Fit more RAM. SQL can cache the entire SIMS DB in RAM and just write the changes to disk. Speeds up SIMS no end. My SIMS VM barely reads and writes.

    Awesome... I'll be ditching the 2003R2 VM for a 2008R2 box... RAM-a-plenty!

+ Post New Thread
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11th March 2013, 07:45 PM
  2. Best way forward.
    By plexer in forum Hardware
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 6th January 2010, 12:13 PM
  3. What is the best way of tackling an MCP
    By Cyber-Dude in forum Courses and Training
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 7th July 2006, 07:47 PM
  4. Best way to install .exe accross the network through GPO
    By tosca925 in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12th December 2005, 09:45 PM
  5. Best way / method to sync time between servers.
    By mac_shinobi in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27th September 2005, 01:40 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts