Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Assigning LUNs to VMware servers in Technical; Hey there!
We are running a mixture of Windows (2003-2008R2) servers both physical and virtual. The virtual environment is ESX ...
16th May 2012, 01:38 PM #1
- Rep Power
Assigning LUNs to VMware servers
We are running a mixture of Windows (2003-2008R2) servers both physical and virtual. The virtual environment is ESX 3.5 (we are planning on upgrading over the summer). On top of this, we have an HDS AMS2100 SAN.
We have a number of SAN LUNs assigned to our virtual servers. However, there doesn’t seem to be much in the way of consistency in how this is done. Some are mapped directly through the OS, some are configured through VMware as RAW device mappings, and some are configured as VMware virtual disks on datastores mapped to the VMware environment.
What are the pros and cons of each approach for both OS and data drives?
IDG Tech News
16th May 2012, 02:39 PM #2
See this thread: Spindles / SAN
20th May 2012, 12:28 AM #3
Pro and cons is all about management for me. VMFS are easier to visualise (vcentre)/manage/backup and the performance overhead is quite minimal compared to RDM (Raw Device Maps)
Originally Posted by mistersparky
I always use VMFS datastores and only exceptions are in specific scenarios such as MS cluster/External Physical Host Access (non-vmware) and host controlled storage snapshots then I would use RDM.
20th May 2012, 09:34 AM #4
There is no advantage to be gained by using raw in this environment. I would stick to vfms
By FatBoy in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 25th February 2011, 03:14 PM
By Zoom7000 in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 27th June 2009, 08:38 PM
By Norphy in forum Windows
Last Post: 14th August 2006, 11:06 AM
By fooby in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 20th January 2006, 10:17 AM
By Mango_RW in forum Windows
Last Post: 6th October 2005, 02:49 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)