+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Looking into Virtual Desktops for small amount of PCs - 4-5k ? Possible in Technical; Originally Posted by burgemaster If they saw no change I dont think i could understand virtualisation to 8x 50-80year olds! ...
  1. #16

    creese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    -28 31' 48.89", +28 25' 37.42" ... if only.
    Posts
    3,253
    Thank Post
    181
    Thanked 375 Times in 304 Posts
    Rep Power
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by burgemaster View Post
    If they saw no change I dont think i could understand virtualisation to 8x 50-80year olds! lol
    I'm a few weeks from my 55th... try me..

  2. #17
    Axel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    239
    Thank Post
    32
    Thanked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    We are about to introduce a specific Ethernet based dedicated Multipoint terminal, developed in conjunction with Microsoft France. (Axel is a French company).

    This device is based on the M80 hardware, but is optimised for a single session, supports all the specific Multipoint teacher monitoring/remote control/shadowing functions (Do USB WMS connections support these - I understand some do and
    some don't...?).

    It also has much improved graphics performance. (For those that are interested we have implemented the Microsoft NScodec {google it!} , and an "off screen video buffer", so video is buffered frame by frame before being displayed. Currently we
    update the screen as soon as we receive new data, which is fast, but not particularly easy on the eyes !. The new buffer makes a massive difference, in that there is a nice smooth transition from frame to frame

    The video enhancements are available as (free) f/w upgrades to existing M80 terminals - though is still beta - so not on our website yet. Email me if you would like a copy of the new f/w to trial

    Matthew@axel.com

    ... as Multipoint server is heavily based on W2008r2 I am not sure the user limit above is applicable for ethernet/RDP connections...?

  3. #18

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    811
    Thank Post
    98
    Thanked 64 Times in 46 Posts
    Rep Power
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by creese View Post
    I'm a few weeks from my 55th... try me..
    Sorry, didnt mean to offend. But these gentlemen are mainly from the Church and I don't think they would be able to comprehend it.

  4. #19

    creese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    -28 31' 48.89", +28 25' 37.42" ... if only.
    Posts
    3,253
    Thank Post
    181
    Thanked 375 Times in 304 Posts
    Rep Power
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by burgemaster View Post
    Sorry, didnt mean to offend. But these gentlemen are mainly from the Church and I don't think they would be able to comprehend it.
    Not offended at all.

  5. #20

    plexer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    13,340
    Thank Post
    624
    Thanked 1,584 Times in 1,421 Posts
    Rep Power
    414
    Windows MultiPoint Server 2011 - Common Questions and Answers Part 2 (from TechEd) - Windows MultiPoint Server Team Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs

    20 stations is the limit.

    I would be very interested in pricing for these units can you PM me inidicative pricing please?

    Ben

  6. #21

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    811
    Thank Post
    98
    Thanked 64 Times in 46 Posts
    Rep Power
    26
    Gone for:
    Dual Quad Core dell server with 32gig ram - 2600
    8 x Axel Zero clients @157 - 1256
    8 x 22" LG LCD Monitors @ 69.99 - 559.91
    8 x TS cal @ 12 - 96
    Total: 4511.91

    It will currently run these 8 machines with Terminal Services, but next year posibly expand to 60 machines with an upgrade to 64gig RAM.
    All depending on how it goes....

    Wish me luck.

  7. #22
    gshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,650
    Thank Post
    164
    Thanked 217 Times in 200 Posts
    Rep Power
    66
    To me the numbers don't stack up for 8 machines... even at 400 per desktop you'd still be coming in less. Granted if you get 60 machines out of it the numbers become a lot nicer.

    If you did go up to 60 would you put a second server in? That's a lot of eggs (users) in one basket (server) if something goes wobbly...

  8. #23
    jamesfed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Reading
    Posts
    2,192
    Thank Post
    134
    Thanked 340 Times in 287 Posts
    Rep Power
    84
    Uve got to remember there is a lot of value added in VDI/Thin Clients as well - think of the power savings of a thin client compared to a fat client (65-90W vs 6-12W).
    Then the wonderful world of ture central management - no chance for a PC to 'go off on its own'.
    Lets remember these systems scale very nicely as well so even if you do make a small loss at just 8 clients you can expand in the future.

    Are you anywhere near Abingdon (Oxfordshire) as we will be doing a demo to any intrested schools in June.

  9. #24
    gshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    2,650
    Thank Post
    164
    Thanked 217 Times in 200 Posts
    Rep Power
    66
    If that's the Kaviza demo have replied in your other thread

    Interesting point of note on power saving; I remember a presentation about server virtualisation stating that if you actually calculate the cost of the power it would take 10yrs+ to get back what you pay out on the system initially... of course it's good to be going green but sometimes the monetary savings aren't as quick to pay back as you'd hope on their own.

    The thin client \ VDI method definitely has benefits but on the other hand you do lose certain features as well and the way our budgets work I still need to see savings on the initial purchase cost as well as longer-term. Hence Kaviza being of interest as you only pay for the server not silly money going on storage systems

    The other reason I'm interested in your Kaviza day is to see what the optimum number of machines you can fit onto each server i.e. do you just take say 2GB \ 1 core per VM and multiply up or is it more \ less efficient than that...
    Last edited by gshaw; 12th April 2012 at 12:52 PM.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. [For Sale] Equipment For Sale - Lots of PCs, Monitors, Laptop Trolley and more!
    By farquea in forum Classified Adverts
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 14th September 2011, 01:07 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 21st May 2010, 12:08 PM
  3. Looking for a shortlist of SCORM content suppliers.
    By Sam_Brown in forum Virtual Learning Platforms
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 28th January 2010, 11:08 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11th June 2009, 10:43 AM
  5. Disable Internet for a group of PCs
    By Michael in forum Windows
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 15th July 2008, 11:32 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •