Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Hyper-V or VMware? in Technical; ...
21st January 2011, 03:52 PM #16
What happens if you need to go beyond 3 physical hosts?
Originally Posted by andrew-virtusolve
I thought it would be a lot more than though. What sort of features are cut for the essentials version?
21st January 2011, 03:55 PM #17
If you can afford it VMware.
If you cant MS, but lots on here use Xen, I cannot comment on Xen.
Linux support on MS is practically non-existant. VMware also has better MS OS support, storage vmotion, better memory management, memory reclamation, memory compression, memory overcommit, Hot adding of cpu and memory. Dynamic resource scheduling and allocation. Traffic shaping.
Last edited by Theblacksheep; 21st January 2011 at 03:59 PM.
21st January 2011, 04:11 PM #18
When you say it is virtually non-existant, do you mean it just won't work? So for example, I was going to put a simple CentOS based Webserver on there, is it possible?
Originally Posted by Theblacksheep
I'll be honest with you, most of the things you list look great (those that I understand) but I'm not sure just how much I would use them. Would it be worth paying the extra for it do you think?
Thank you to everyone for the quick and fantastic replies, really interesting to see the different scenarios every one is in.
21st January 2011, 04:13 PM #19
So, you install VMWare and the first thing you have to do is install a load of tools on a PC to manage it with anyway!
With 2008R2 the Host License includes a Guest OS anyway so you might as well install the 2008R2 GUI and anyone can RDP in and manage the Hyper-V anyway!
Yes the VMware footprint is tiny and it takes less time to load but at least 2008R2 will support your HP embedded raid drivers and a bucket of other stuff that VMware throws a hissy fit at!
If youre a fruit cake and have a load of NIX boxes that you want to virtualise you should stick with VMware ESXi if you already have an M$ Licensing agreement then Enterprise Server or Datacentre and Hyper-V is the way to go.
I'd rather save the VMware Licensing money and buy a SAN with the cash I've left over....
21st January 2011, 04:34 PM #20
Microsoft only officially supports SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Other distributions will work fine, it just means you won't be able to ask Microsoft for help.
Originally Posted by Tricky_Dicky
Whichever Linux distribution you choose, you will probably want to install the Hyper-V integration services. For details on how to do this see the links below.
Last edited by Arthur; 21st January 2011 at 04:37 PM.
Thanks to Arthur from:
Tricky_Dicky (21st January 2011)
21st January 2011, 06:28 PM #21
Another vote for XEN here I have used this at two sites now and have found it really reliable and has some great features Snap Shotting of VM Servers, Monitoring all the Servers quickly from one Console, Live Migration of VM's, Build one template for a Server, then build other Servers from this templare etc. and much more as well as all these features being available on the free version.I have also found this a great way of developing new funtionality on the Network as you can build a VM Server from a template pretty quickly, test things without causing you problems on other Servers, Snapshot it before making large configuration changes if the changes don't work return it to its previous state.I could go on.
21st January 2011, 07:23 PM #22
We use Xen also, easy to install, cheaper than vmware, been rock solid . we also host our virtual desktops (Xendesktop) on the xenserver.
21st January 2011, 07:38 PM #23
Another XenServer user here, was going to use Hyper-V but decided to go to Xen instead and not looked back
21st January 2011, 07:43 PM #24
Originally Posted by Steven_Cleaver
We use xen few heart in mouth moments when pooling! also with 5.6 and 5.6.1 does it still use 100% same space when snap shoting? how much space does vmware and hyper v user lets a 100GB server?
21st January 2011, 08:03 PM #25
I use linux KVM running on Ubuntu 10.04 using a oracle file system cluster between hosts - runs really well plus you can do live migration between hosts for free. Only thing is you cant get the high availability stuff as it doesnt exist (yet).
22nd January 2011, 10:03 AM #26
We use hyper-v here and it works well, epiclly easy to manage and setup also.
22nd January 2011, 10:08 AM #27
Also RE linux and hyperV I run many different distros but the main production ones are ubuntu server and gentoo and both work perfectly.
22nd January 2011, 10:26 AM #28
I've always gone for VMWare, I have done a couple of installs of Hyper-V (installing on bare metal systems)
22nd January 2011, 01:15 PM #29
It still does use the same space for snap shoting but at the moment it isn't a worry as the SAN has enough storage capacity, and I only usually keep a couple of snapshots of Servers I am making changes to or developing, you can also export the Snap shots somewhere else if you want to keep these, we use a 8TB Buffalo station as that is how we do our backups export to Terrastation then to USB Hardrive for offsite backups, and USB hard disks on rotating basis.
Thanks to Steven_Cleaver from:
irsprint84 (22nd January 2011)
22nd January 2011, 02:11 PM #30
Thanks for info only really ever looked at once, is the export a snapshot you do? are you using specific backup software? I may look at getting a NAS to do this this coming financial year
By gshaw in forum Windows Server 2008
Last Post: 30th September 2010, 09:43 AM
By phoenixsurfer in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 22nd June 2010, 01:32 PM
By Duke in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 3rd June 2009, 11:11 AM
By wesleyw in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 6th March 2009, 03:06 PM
By Ric_ in forum General Chat
Last Post: 12th January 2006, 03:32 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)