Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Quick straw poll: virtualisation & backup in Technical; Just looking for a quick summary of responses for what your current preferred \ in use techologies are in your ...
23rd November 2010, 03:14 PM #1
Quick straw poll: virtualisation & backup
Just looking for a quick summary of responses for what your current preferred \ in use techologies are in your virtual environments? I've gone for the two options I'm looking at in each case but feel free to add your own
VMWare or Hyper-V
Backup Exec or Microsoft DPM
iSCSI, FC or NFS?
IDG Tech News
23rd November 2010, 03:19 PM #2
Originally Posted by gshaw
23rd November 2010, 03:19 PM #3
hyper v, dpm and iscsi. hyper v as it sits on windows , dpm as its cheap and iscsi for much the same reason.
23rd November 2010, 03:48 PM #4
23rd November 2010, 03:55 PM #5
Originally Posted by Butuz
Last edited by salan; 23rd November 2010 at 03:55 PM.
Reason: typing with my nose
23rd November 2010, 04:00 PM #6
For VMWare \ Backup Exec people did you go to the VM agents or still using the classic agent backup style? If using the VM agent how did it work out price wise (bearing in mind you don't need the Windows agents once you get the VM agent as far as I understand?)
Also for Backup Exec people have you tested restore processes and is it working reliably?
23rd November 2010, 04:06 PM #7
Custom scripts to take images. Nothing put in for file-level restore
Local storage on the server
23rd November 2010, 04:18 PM #8
- Backup Exec and Veeam (Veeam isn't actually in place yet because the full virtualisation plan hasn't gone ahead yet)
23rd November 2010, 04:18 PM #9
Backup exec agents and no it didnt restore well.
Originally Posted by gshaw
We had to do a full DR due to a gas explosion near by just a few weeks ago.
Suffice to say that we are in the proccess of re assessing our DR options as we were (in our opinion) down for too long.
We have VDR as well running and that (as we found out) is only any good if you still have a VM!
We had the disks 'trashed' so no vm to recover to.
So we had to rebuild some machines manually and then restore from backup.
As the saying goes. Are you REALLY sure you backups will work? Have you actually tried them FULLY?
As we found out no they don't!
23rd November 2010, 04:21 PM #10
If you want full DR, check out Veeam for a better way of backing up entire virtual machines and VMware SRM (Site Recovery Manager) for a proper DR solution that will allow you to test your DR and Business Continuity procedures without having to take down your network.
Sorry to hear about the gas explosion, I think anything like that is a sysadmin's worst nightmare.
23rd November 2010, 04:24 PM #11
VMWare vSphere 4.1
Commvault Simpana 8 using the VMware iDataAgent and VADP
I'm still in the testing phase but overall its looking good.
23rd November 2010, 04:36 PM #12
Sounds good, but have you actually done a full DR yet?
IE fresh hardware and restored from backup to a fully working server?
I have ben let down so many times with these.
23rd November 2010, 04:39 PM #13
Firestreamer to USB Disk
sick of giving money to backup exec for agents, upgrades that don't always work
23rd November 2010, 04:40 PM #14
Not yet, that's why I say I'm still in the testing phase. I've spent the last couple of weeks getting it installed, getting the backup proxy in place and getting the backups just working. The recovery test phase is what's coming next.
I have however tested DR with physical servers using Simpana so I know the software is good.
23rd November 2010, 04:47 PM #15
Please let us know how you get on.
By Kamran7860 in forum General Chat
Last Post: 16th January 2010, 01:23 AM
By GrumbleDook in forum Windows
Last Post: 26th November 2009, 01:57 PM
By russdev in forum General EduGeek News/Announcements
Last Post: 29th July 2009, 11:39 PM
By Luke_T in forum Netbooks, PDA and Phones
Last Post: 23rd June 2009, 01:18 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)