+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Hyper-V Server or 2008 full? in Technical; Just about to build a new server to replace an existing lone, does everything server. I plan to use Hyper-V ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cambridgeshire, UK
    Posts
    306
    Thank Post
    58
    Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
    Rep Power
    17

    Hyper-V Server or 2008 full?

    Just about to build a new server to replace an existing lone, does everything server. I plan to use Hyper-V as host but not sure whether to use the Hyper-V server or full blown 2008 R2 with Hyper-V. Any suggestions?

    Dave

  2. #2


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,589
    Thank Post
    228
    Thanked 856 Times in 735 Posts
    Rep Power
    296
    the advantage of using a full server is you have a local interface you can use. The disadvantage is needing an extra 4gb or so to run an os thats essentially doing naff all

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cambridgeshire, UK
    Posts
    306
    Thank Post
    58
    Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
    Rep Power
    17
    4gig! Wow, really?! I've planned for 2gb for a full host install!

  4. #4

    SYNACK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11,170
    Thank Post
    868
    Thanked 2,696 Times in 2,286 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Rep Power
    772
    4GB is a massive overstatment, 2GB or even 1.5GB should be fine for the host install as long as you are not running extra services off it. Could probably go down to 1GB but then you would be cutting it a bit thin with AV etc on the host box.

    You could of course use server core as your host OS which would be fine with 1GB but then you may as well be running a basic Hyper-V server.

  5. #5

    sparkeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,747
    Thank Post
    1,275
    Thanked 1,651 Times in 1,106 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22
    Rep Power
    506
    I went for full server 2008R2 standard (and 2GB has been fine) mostly for the local GUI.
    To be honest, if I were to do it again I would probably use Hyper-V server over standard as I most remote in anyway and Hyper-V Server has a few more features which I could have taken advantage of in the future such as clustering and live migration.

    Alternatively I would have gone for full enterprise version server; all the features and more VM licences.

    Version comparison is here

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cambridgeshire, UK
    Posts
    306
    Thank Post
    58
    Thanked 23 Times in 20 Posts
    Rep Power
    17
    What about if I plan to use BackupExec 2010 to backup the VMs? Would this be best installed and run on the host rather than individual VMs? Would I then be 'forced' down the full 2008 R2 install rather than Hyper-V server?

  7. #7


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,589
    Thank Post
    228
    Thanked 856 Times in 735 Posts
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by djones View Post
    4gig! Wow, really?! I've planned for 2gb for a full host install!
    i just found with 2gb anything i wanted to do on the host was a pain reassign the ram round and the vm and host seemed happier 2008 r2 enterprise btw

  8. #8

    tmcd35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    5,665
    Thank Post
    850
    Thanked 893 Times in 738 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    328
    We use Win2k8 r2 Datacenter here. Seems to work without any probs leaving 2Gb for the host OS.

  9. #9


    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,589
    Thank Post
    228
    Thanked 856 Times in 735 Posts
    Rep Power
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by tmcd35 View Post
    We use Win2k8 r2 Datacenter here. Seems to work without any probs leaving 2Gb for the host OS.
    like i said i just found it ran better with 4 it may just be me but tbh ram isnt that expensive to just shove another stick or 2 in and never harms having more

  10. #10

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15,945
    Thank Post
    886
    Thanked 1,696 Times in 1,474 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    447
    Our test machines run fine with the OS having 1GB. I would use around 2GB for a full server install.

    It depends if you are comfortable with having to troubleshoot the server should it go wrong without a GUI. If you have become reliant on the GUI you should probably stick with it and use the full version. The last thing you want is to be stuck when fixing a server you need backup ASAP.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. hyper v server 2008 r2 and ups
    By sted in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 28th March 2012, 04:18 PM
  2. ESXi of Hyper V for server 2008
    By duxbuz in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 28th March 2010, 03:04 PM
  3. Server 2008 R2 RC & Ms Hyper-V Server 2008 R2 Beta
    By Kamran7860 in forum Windows Server 2008 R2
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12th May 2009, 06:04 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 5th May 2009, 02:17 PM
  5. Hyper-V without Server 2008
    By Zoom7000 in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 24th September 2008, 08:45 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •