Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Bridge setup for multiple Xen VMs in Technical; Hello All,
We have recently had two new ADSL connections hooked up which we want to combine with a load ...
-
17th May 2010, 11:33 AM #1 Bridge setup for multiple Xen VMs
Hello All,
We have recently had two new ADSL connections hooked up which we want to combine with a load balancer / failover router. We also want filtering. ZeroShell can do the load-balancing between two ADSL connections, and SmoothWall can do the filtering. I've set up virtual machines for both on a single physical server which has three network connections - one for out LAN, and one leading to each ADSL router.
The ZeroShell virtual machine has three virtual network interfaces - 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.1.1 for the ADSL routers and 10.0.0.4. The SmoothWall VM has two virtual network interfaces - 10.0.0.3 for the internal network and 10.0.0.5 for external.
All I have to do is get SmoothWall's 10.0.0.5 and ZeroShell's 10.0.0.3 talking to each other. This works just fine if I place both VM's network connections in the same, default, virtual bridge (xenbr0). However, if I move the virtual interfaces assigned to 10.0.0.3 and 10.0.0.5 to their own bridge, SmoothWall can't see the ZeroShell VM and has no connection to the outside world.
Obviously I don't want the ZeroShell machine available to the LAN, otherwise people could simply set it as their gateway server and bypass the SmoothWall filtering server. Has anyone any idea what I'm doing wrong? Is there something I've forgotten to configure when setting up the virtual interfaces, or the virtual bridge? Network bridges are set up in /etc/rc.local:
Code:
/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start vifnum=0
/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start vifnum=1
/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start vifnum=2
brctl addbr xenbr3
Do I need to add something to that last line? From reading the brctl man page, I get the impression that bridges set up via brctl act just like old network hubs - all network traffic on each port is replicated to all the other ports. Is that correct, or am I missing something?
--
David Hicks
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
17th May 2010, 12:01 PM #2 Hmm, odd: if I do "brctl showmacs xenbr3" I get a couple of completly random-looking MAC addresses listed, nothin like the ones I've assigned to the VMs that should be attched to that bridge. What gives?
--
David Hicks
-
-
17th May 2010, 01:52 PM #3 
Originally Posted by
dhicks
brctl addbr xenbr3
Ah, think I've got it - replacing the above line with:
/etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start vifnum=3 netdev=dummy0
seems to work. What was I missing? Does the bridge need to be set as "up" or something before it will start passing traffic around?
--
David Hicks
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By m25man in forum Wireless Networks
Replies: 11
Last Post: 6th May 2010, 09:50 PM
-
By Chuckster in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
Replies: 3
Last Post: 11th October 2009, 11:11 PM
-
By cookie_monster in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Replies: 2
Last Post: 28th July 2009, 03:50 PM
-
By fox1977 in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Replies: 2
Last Post: 29th January 2009, 11:34 AM
-
By Rattler in forum Wireless Networks
Replies: 9
Last Post: 30th November 2007, 11:08 AM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules