+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Virtualization in Technical; im thinking about virtualizing a few of our unimportant servers to start with and doing it all inhouse using Hyper-V ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Four Oaks
    Posts
    283
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    21

    Virtualization

    im thinking about virtualizing a few of our unimportant servers to start with and doing it all inhouse using Hyper-V servers. What do i need to get started

    2 basic servers with loads of ram - Raid do i need it?
    1 or 2 sans?

    and the correct licensing of course

    would that be good enough to get me started

  2. #2

    tmcd35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    5,878
    Thank Post
    879
    Thanked 959 Times in 790 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    339
    The first thing you need is planning (lots of it) and the second thing is time (as much as you can get).

    There's nothing stopping you starting with just 1 server and adding additional servers and SAN's, etc later as the project grows. I started here by converting an exiting physical server to a VM and then throwing more RAM into the old physical server and formating the HDD's installing Hyper-V. I've since done that to each of our three existing servers and have just bought the first new dedicated server last easter. Will be looking towards SANs and storage in the Summer.

    Ideally, you'd want 2 servers with enough cpu and RAM to run the intended VM's and an iSCSI SAN for storage. But it's not necersarrily needed straight away.

    Best thing to do is to sit down and look at your existing infrastructure. Look at how it can be virtualised. Plan the steps to achieving that and compare that with the budget and time you have.

  3. #3


    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,414
    Thank Post
    184
    Thanked 356 Times in 285 Posts
    Rep Power
    149
    Does HyperV support your OSes? When i last looked it didnt officially support any linux distros other than redhat and Suse.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Four Oaks
    Posts
    283
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    we only use MS OS

  5. #5
    maark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    leicester
    Posts
    478
    Thank Post
    90
    Thanked 76 Times in 67 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    I have done without a san but with 2 Dell R710 servers - never used hyper v or virtualisation stuff before - found it very easy to use.
    Have got print, exams,wsus, impero, ghost, terminal servers all working fine on virtual - am going to get more across.
    Your server processor needs to support virtualisation - may need to be turned on in bios.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    0
    I am doing it without a SAN at the minute on a HP DL 380 G5 with 20GB of RAM and 2x 2.5 Quad Xeons. I'm about to hit the limit on internal storage - currently RAID 1 for 2008 R2 w/ HyperV @ 146GB and RAID 5 for storing VMs @ ~300GB. It currently running Exchange, 2008 R2 DC, WDS, Print Server, LANSweeper (Software Auditing), SharePoint 2010 Foundation, Sophos Server, WSUS Server.

    This summer we're going to expand it with a Dell EqualLogic and another HP DL 380 G6.

    On a basic level you just need a Server that can support Hardware Virtualization, be it Intel or AMD, most modern servers will support this, as with everything the more RAM the better, but don't think you need to spend £8000 on 144 GB of RAM, our current box started with 8GB, then 16GB, and now 20GB

  7. #7
    DaveCoop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    85
    Thank Post
    6
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    12
    Spec Below:

    Dot Hill Product Family 2330 Series
    Product Type RAID, JBOD
    Chassis Configuration 2U
    Disk Architecture 3Gb SAS/3Gb SATA-II
    Max Drives per Chassis 12 drives
    Total Capacity 1.7TB/56TB (with expansion trays)
    Total Disks 56
    Mounting Options 19” Rack, Telco Rack, Rack tray
    Max Number of Chassis 5 (1 RAID and 4 JBOD)
    Max Capacity per Chassis 24TB (2TB SATA-II drives)
    Data Management Services (DMS) AssuredSnap™, AssuredCopy™
    iSCSI (IETF) ICMP (RFC 792, 950, 1256)
    IP (RFC, 894, 1092) SCSI-2 and SCSI-3
    TCP (RFC 793) FC Channel
    Initiators All iSCSI compliant initiators
    Interface Type RJ-45
    External Ports 2/4 iSCSI (Gigabit Ethernet)
    Single/Dual Controller
    Max Number of Drives 56
    Drive Options 3Gb SAS 146GB 15K RPM
    3Gb SAS 300GB 15K RPM
    3Gb SAS 450GB 15K RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 500GB 7200 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 750GB 7200 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 1TB 7200 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 1TB 5400 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 2TB 5400 RPM
    Levels Supported Non-RAID, 0,1,3,5,6,10, and 50
    RAID Type Hardware
    Cache Memory 512MB per controller
    Cache Backup Battery-free protection with super capacitors
    Virtual disks per System 32
    Volumes per virtual disk 128
    Volumes per System 256
    Mirrored Cache Yes - SimulCache™
    Super Capacitor Cache Backup Yes
    Cache Backup to Flash Yes - Non-volatile
    Interface Types Mini DB9 RS232, 10/100 Ethernet
    Protocols Supported SNMP, SSL, SSH, SMTP
    Management Consoles WEB GUI, CLI
    Management Software RAIDar
    Last edited by DaveCoop; 20th May 2010 at 02:11 PM.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Four Oaks
    Posts
    283
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveCoop View Post
    We just looking into this for a SAN solution, coming in at around 20K but 7 year warranty not VM 4 ratified yet so RM wont install there CC solution. but a worthy investment it is ratified to VM3.5

    Spec Below:

    Dot Hill Product Family 2330 Series
    Product Type RAID, JBOD
    Chassis Configuration 2U
    Disk Architecture 3Gb SAS/3Gb SATA-II
    Max Drives per Chassis 12 drives
    Total Capacity 1.7TB/56TB (with expansion trays)
    Total Disks 56
    Mounting Options 19” Rack, Telco Rack, Rack tray
    Max Number of Chassis 5 (1 RAID and 4 JBOD)
    Max Capacity per Chassis 24TB (2TB SATA-II drives)
    Data Management Services (DMS) AssuredSnap™, AssuredCopy™
    iSCSI (IETF) ICMP (RFC 792, 950, 1256)
    IP (RFC, 894, 1092) SCSI-2 and SCSI-3
    TCP (RFC 793) FC Channel
    Initiators All iSCSI compliant initiators
    Interface Type RJ-45
    External Ports 2/4 iSCSI (Gigabit Ethernet)
    Single/Dual Controller
    Max Number of Drives 56
    Drive Options 3Gb SAS 146GB 15K RPM
    3Gb SAS 300GB 15K RPM
    3Gb SAS 450GB 15K RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 500GB 7200 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 750GB 7200 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 1TB 7200 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 1TB 5400 RPM
    3Gb SATA-II 2TB 5400 RPM
    Levels Supported Non-RAID, 0,1,3,5,6,10, and 50
    RAID Type Hardware
    Cache Memory 512MB per controller
    Cache Backup Battery-free protection with super capacitors
    Virtual disks per System 32
    Volumes per virtual disk 128
    Volumes per System 256
    Mirrored Cache Yes - SimulCache™
    Super Capacitor Cache Backup Yes
    Cache Backup to Flash Yes - Non-volatile
    Interface Types Mini DB9 RS232, 10/100 Ethernet
    Protocols Supported SNMP, SSL, SSH, SMTP
    Management Consoles WEB GUI, CLI
    Management Software RAIDar
    Thanks for the Info, certainly could'nt afford 20K this year. more like 5-8K

  9. #9

    webman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    8,413
    Thank Post
    642
    Thanked 964 Times in 664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    327
    @dirtydogmitchell: £5-8K for the SAN, or for servers + SAN? If just the SAN, have a look at the Sun 7110. There are many happy customers of it on here - ourselves (bossman and I) and john, off the top of my head.

  10. #10
    maark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    leicester
    Posts
    478
    Thank Post
    90
    Thanked 76 Times in 67 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    We spent about 7K - two Dell R710 - 12GB of ram in each but will probably expand ram soon. Can run about 5 virtuals on each, maybe more.

  11. #11
    DaveCoop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    85
    Thank Post
    6
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    12
    no problem, they do cheaper solutions Stone Computers: Laura
    Last edited by DaveCoop; 20th May 2010 at 02:12 PM.

  12. #12
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,909
    Thank Post
    954
    Thanked 451 Times in 380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    93
    All this hardware is overkill to say the least!

    I have 4 Dell R300's with 1 Xeon processor and 16gb of ram. They hapily run 5 Virtual servers and never go over 10% cpu.

    Cost about 900 quid each.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Four Oaks
    Posts
    283
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by zag View Post
    All this hardware is overkill to say the least!

    I have 4 Dell R300's with 1 Xeon processor and 16gb of ram. They hapily run 5 Virtual servers and never go over 10% cpu.

    Cost about 900 quid each.
    What kind of storage?

  14. #14
    DaveCoop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    85
    Thank Post
    6
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    12
    To each there own Zag this works for me, This is just the SAN solution, as we are becoming more media orientated. we will only be using 2 actual servers to run 5 virtual servers inc E-Mail etc so all in all not so much overkill but forward planning as this solution should last the 7 year warranty that's included

  15. #15
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,909
    Thank Post
    954
    Thanked 451 Times in 380 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    93
    I use standard 500gb drives in them.

    One server I have upgraded to an Intel 160GB SSD as the OS drive and its blazingly fast.

    No San here, don't see the point.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Virtualization. Yes? No?
    By Number6 in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 21st June 2010, 09:47 AM
  2. Virtualization and Performance?
    By Quackers in forum Windows Server 2000/2003
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 13th May 2010, 11:13 AM
  3. Is virtualization the only way?
    By nicholab in forum General Chat
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17th May 2009, 11:54 PM
  4. How can I use virtualization in my new network
    By reggiep in forum General Chat
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 24th April 2009, 10:54 AM
  5. Virtualization
    By Hightower in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 22nd September 2008, 04:35 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •