Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Load Balancing in Technical; Hello all
I have recently implemented my frist thin client enviroment, currently have about 40 terminals on one server. This ...
-
13th October 2006, 10:00 AM #1 Load Balancing
Hello all
I have recently implemented my frist thin client enviroment, currently have about 40 terminals on one server. This is working well. However i am goining to be expanding the amout of terminals that i have on my network and want to implement more servers which ideally would be load balanced.
I am running a terminal server only enviroment and would like a hardware based soloution, can anyone suggest anything?
I would prefer not to use citrix if i can.
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
13th October 2006, 10:26 AM #2
-
-
13th October 2006, 10:27 AM #3 Re: Load Balancing
For 'simple' load balancing you could use round robin DNS entries. Obviosly would not take into account the load of each machine etc though
.
-
-
13th October 2006, 10:31 AM #4 Re: Load Balancing
However if you require something more configurable how about a Linux load balancer?
Simple, using 'balance':
http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/07/27/1729229
Rather more complex, using the 'Linux Virtual Server' Project:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
-
-
13th October 2006, 10:33 AM #5 Re: Load Balancing
I am looking for an aplication load balance. I Think round robin is just a network load balance, isn't it?
-
-
13th October 2006, 10:35 AM #6 Re: Load Balancing
It basically keeps going round the hosts as long as they are available.
-
-
13th October 2006, 11:04 AM #7 Re: Load Balancing

Originally Posted by
Jonny_sims I am looking for an aplication load balance. I Think round robin is just a network load balance, isn't it?
Look my Linux suggestions then.
-
-
13th October 2006, 11:11 AM #8 Re: Load Balancing
I am looking for an aplication load balance. I Think round robin is just a network load balance, isn't it?
yes and no, It creates the effect of spreading users over different servers, it won't prioritise lightly loaded serves.
AFIK its the best your going to get without Citrix or Linux
-
-
13th October 2006, 12:15 PM #9 Re: Load Balancing
2X do a Terminal Server load balancing program. That any use to you?
-
-
16th October 2006, 12:21 PM #10 Re: Load Balancing
We have a Terminal Server for each of our suites of thin clients. Being as our labsa are all in constant use, this was felt to be the best method available 6 months ago at their inception...
-
-
6th December 2006, 10:43 AM #11
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Load Balancing
not wanting to push product on here but norphy is right , the 2x product is excellent and I beleive is free on trial, how ever i do think it works as a round robin solution
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
Replies: 5
Last Post: 25th November 2009, 09:48 AM
-
By wesleyw in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Replies: 8
Last Post: 6th November 2007, 05:20 PM
-
By wesleyw in forum Windows
Replies: 2
Last Post: 31st October 2007, 03:25 PM
-
By Teth in forum How do you do....it?
Replies: 6
Last Post: 1st November 2006, 05:49 PM
-
By browolf in forum How do you do....it?
Replies: 3
Last Post: 5th September 2005, 12:26 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules