+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Virtualistion questions in Technical; Originally Posted by powdarrmonkey sparkeh: linky? Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 There you go fella....
  1. #16

    sparkeh's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,017
    Thank Post
    1,362
    Thanked 1,770 Times in 1,192 Posts
    Blog Entries
    22
    Rep Power
    530
    Quote Originally Posted by powdarrmonkey View Post
    sparkeh: linky?
    Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008

    There you go fella.

  2. Thanks to sparkeh from:

    powdarrmonkey (27th October 2009)

  3. #17

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    390
    Thank Post
    23
    Thanked 95 Times in 61 Posts
    Rep Power
    45
    Hi there.

    A Windows 2008 Standard licence allows you to run a single virtual instance on top of the OS - so you can install Windows on the box and legitimately virtualise your network server with one single licence.


    Ref:
    http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...r%20hi-res.pdf


    It seems to me that the problems people here have mentioned with virtualising DC's are around using snapshot type features, but it's not something I've paid too much attantion to, so a little more research would be recommended.

  4. Thanks to theriver from:

    sparkeh (27th October 2009)

  5. #18

    Theblacksheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In a house.
    Posts
    1,946
    Thank Post
    139
    Thanked 291 Times in 211 Posts
    Rep Power
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by sparkeh View Post
    Free? Doesn't it come with your purchase of 2008?
    I have been reading the MS documentation on hyper-v and the installation instructions tell you that you can install the 'server core' to have a minimal installation to run hyper-v or through a full server installation. Therefore I assumed that you had to have 2008 running.
    It does... and its free.... however for windows ontop of it you'll need an enterprise or appropriate CPU datacenter licences. Unless you are running 1 VM, in which standard will work, but that'll be the only windows VM allowed on the box.

    @tmc35: I've not had to do any windows repairs with VMware converter. Exchange worked straight away and I've not had to do a repair... is this something specific to hyper-v?

  6. #19

    tmcd35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    5,864
    Thank Post
    878
    Thanked 952 Times in 784 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    338
    Quote Originally Posted by teejay View Post
    VMWare converts DC's no problem, have done a few over summer and had no problems at all.
    Yes I know it can be done, I've done it - just proceed with caution!

    You'll be take a DC offline for an extended period of time and performing a repair install of Windows on it. It could seriously get out of sync with your live AD and cause all sorts of problems. If at all possible demote the server from a DC first and re-promote to a DC after P2V conversion is complete.

    P.S.> Did I mention M$'s P2V convertor (free) works on live running systems and is very very fast. The VMWare convertor (last time I used it) had to booted from CD and took an eternity to run through.

  7. #20

    ZeroHour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    5,697
    Thank Post
    950
    Thanked 1,355 Times in 828 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    451
    Its free as in when you buy your 2008 lic you automatically get the right to run another instance of 2008 virtualised as that extra lic is free. If you buy enterprise you get 4 instances virtualised where as standard edition is only one.
    Running 2008 on the bare metal does use resources but the hyperv layer means it only mimimally effects the virtual machine performance. The VM's access the hardware using a direct layer rather then just routing through the OS (but it does still a little)

    As for converting, I have used SCVMM which is sweeties to license and so far not had a bad image yet or a reinstall. SCVMM works with vmware as well and can coverter multiple drives etc, its really quite nice tbh as well as converting a vm in hyper-v to say esx if you wanted.

  8. Thanks to ZeroHour from:

    sparkeh (27th October 2009)

  9. #21

    tmcd35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    5,864
    Thank Post
    878
    Thanked 952 Times in 784 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Rep Power
    338
    Quote Originally Posted by Theblacksheep View Post
    @tmc35: I've not had to do any windows repairs with VMware converter. Exchange worked straight away and I've not had to do a repair... is this something specific to hyper-v?
    I think, when the VMWare Convertor works, it puts all the right drivers in place - probably why it takes so long - and so you don't have to do a repair install.

    With most P2V conversion you have to do a repair install because of the change of hardware between the physical and virtual environments. Without doing it you can get BSOD's and the like.

    Like I say I found the VMWare Convertor very touch and go as to whether is wanted to run or complete on some hardware. Seemed to be as picky about hardware as ESX is. Grrrr.

  10. #22

    Theblacksheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In a house.
    Posts
    1,946
    Thank Post
    139
    Thanked 291 Times in 211 Posts
    Rep Power
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by tmcd35 View Post
    I think, when the VMWare Convertor works, it puts all the right drivers in place - probably why it takes so long - and so you don't have to do a repair install.

    With most P2V conversion you have to do a repair install because of the change of hardware between the physical and virtual environments. Without doing it you can get BSOD's and the like.

    Like I say I found the VMWare Convertor very touch and go as to whether is wanted to run or complete on some hardware. Seemed to be as picky about hardware as ESX is. Grrrr.
    Thanks for the info.

    Our VMware converstion of exchange03 was done live (converter4 rocks) and took about 6 hours with about 100GB of data and a resizing of the HDs as they were coming over (thanks RM for the 8gb C drive)... I've not personally had any hardware troubles with conversion, just powered on afterwards (removed a few devices) and it worked.

  11. #23

    vikpaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Saudi Arabia
    Posts
    5,785
    Thank Post
    715
    Thanked 1,440 Times in 1,193 Posts
    Rep Power
    359
    sparkeh,

    i struggle to come to terms with using windows on a nice bit of expensive server kit, but heck we all do it. but, using hyper V just seems to be asking for trouble : basing potentially multiple virtual servers on one bit of hardware all under the auspices of microsoft software. alarm bells ringing anyone?

    Ric_ is the only xen expert i know, so maybe he can give you some tips, he has SIMS running on it and probably much more. It's too unixy from my understanding.

    I've been testing VMWare and much prefer it. VMWare server is free to use on Windows but very limited. VMWare Fusion for macs is awesome. We're looking at going for ESXi for our new blade server but to get the best out of it, you have to pay for the management tool.

    When we researched one of the biggest differences we saw between esx and xen was something to do with memory management and allocating dedicated amounts to each VM.

    I think Xen would be the best option if i / we had the time to play around with it and learn it well, but we'll most likely go with VMWare as it seems easier to use.

    The VMWare stuff is free to download and use so you can test it out.

    As for converting physical to virtual, it's possible, but i had a few problems because i was sending the VM to some kit with rather different hardware to the original machine and it didn't like it. If you are going virtual and it's possible i would recommend starting from scratch and rebuilding the server if it's possible. It's a good excuse for getting rid of any legacy issues you may have.

    Search the forums there are some very good threads on different bits of kit and the advantages and differences between them. Plenty to take in.

    Good luck.

  12. #24
    ahuxham's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,122
    Thank Post
    76
    Thanked 138 Times in 109 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by sparkeh View Post
    Ahhhh! I see now, theres a standalone version!

    Thanks I get it now
    Yeap, stand-alone version running on a server 2008 core, no need to purchase 2008 at all, totally free product, and I guess Microsofts push toward the market, with Citrix, Sun and VMware offering free solutions.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Some Questions
    By pritchardavid in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 7th October 2009, 08:24 AM
  2. More virtualisation questions :)
    By techyphil in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 20th November 2008, 12:16 AM
  3. TS questions
    By meastaugh1 in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 7th September 2007, 07:56 PM
  4. Questions about your DC
    By Kyle in forum Windows
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 8th June 2006, 08:14 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •