Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, ESX 3.5 = Virtual Disk or Raw Device Mapping? in Technical; Does anyone know what would be the best implementation of a new file server based upon ESX 3.5 using Server ...
7th October 2009, 10:14 AM #1
ESX 3.5 = Virtual Disk or Raw Device Mapping?
Does anyone know what would be the best implementation of a new file server based upon ESX 3.5 using Server 2008 Datacenter R2?
I have created the virtual server which is all well and good - I know 2008 R2 isnt a supported OS yet however this is just for testing purposes at the moment and works perfectly well without VMWare tools installed.
The question is when i created the VM i gave it a 40GB C: partition. When i come to add an additional virtual disk - i get presented with "Create a new virtual disk" or "Raw Device Mappings".
Has anyone tried out both and found any differences in speed between the two? My existing file servers are based upon "new virtual disk" which resides inside the VM - these have worked well for me in the past however i want to make sure if i am re-designing the system i get the best out of it.
The VM's run on IBM x2650 hosts with FC to IBM DS3400 (48 x 300GB 15k SAS)
7th October 2009, 12:13 PM #2
Raw is ideal for that extra bit of performance, I only use for Exchange & SQL type applications. You can loose some flexibility such as VM snapshots.
But I always aim to create a virtual disk. (file on vmfs)
If you have a Fibre Channel SAN you can utilise technologies like NPIV which is fast and enable's LUN masking per Virtual Machine, ideal for RAW devices.
Thanks to apaton from:
Paid_Peanuts (8th October 2009)
By Dos_Box in forum Hardware
Last Post: 12th May 2009, 11:44 PM
By somabc in forum Other Stuff
Last Post: 17th February 2009, 06:55 PM
By Andi in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 7th August 2008, 10:40 AM
By SYNACK in forum Windows
Last Post: 25th March 2008, 09:02 PM
By Jamie_a in forum Windows
Last Post: 30th January 2008, 03:36 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)