Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Xencenter 5.5 wow in Technical; We have just had Visualisation setup at are our establishment and are using Xencenter 5.5 wow.
6th August 2009, 08:22 PM #1
Xencenter 5.5 wow
We have just had Visualisation setup at are our establishment and are using Xencenter 5.5 wow.
And so much more
6th August 2009, 08:33 PM #2
I'm pretty impressed with it myself the only issue that i've found so far is that it doesn't support jumbo frames (as far as I can tell) but it seems fast enough without. Once you get your head around it it's a breeze to setup and manage. It also can't handle card bonds of more than 2 nics. Overall though i'm impressed especially for the price
Must have a play with the snapshotting
Last edited by cookie_monster; 6th August 2009 at 08:49 PM.
6th August 2009, 08:45 PM #3
6th August 2009, 08:48 PM #4
I'd read a few ways on the forums but most had the dreaded 'unsuported by Citrix' next to them so I avoided it.
What's involved in setting up the PIF as unmanaged?
6th August 2009, 08:51 PM #5
Multiway bonding was surprisingly simple to setup, and if it goes wrong you can always run a xe pif-scan command to have Xenserver redetect all the PIFs and rewrite all the config files
6th August 2009, 09:06 PM #6
Fortunately i've only got two spare Nics on each box so the two card bonds I have will do just fine for now but i'll look into it for future reference.
6th August 2009, 10:12 PM #7
Spent the last few days with a CSE Engineer implementing XenServer 5.5.
Now have 4 virtual servers running on a new compaq server, one for shares, one as a secondary DC & DNS, One for Printers and the other I will use for things like WSUS and AV.
Seems to work really well and I think its a good way of dabbling into Virtualisation; I'm already planning proper SAN setup for next year. Will see how this year goes along with budgets.
Not played with the Xen Console too much yet, but from what I was shown I am mightly impressed.
7th August 2009, 10:31 AM #8
As I say I haven't played with the snapshots yet, how much space do they use is it the same as the VM size or just changes since the last snapshot?
7th August 2009, 06:50 PM #9
I haven't played with it that much but I have tried live snapshotting so without stopping the Server it creates a small file that holds the settings about 8Mb but it also creates a virtual disk for that snapshot the same size as the Virtual disk on the snap shotted server.
You can then create a new VM from this snap shot so again this would take up the size of the original server (make sure if you do it live you copy in the Mac address from original VM) so for a short time you would require at least three times the space of the original server. You can then delete the original snap shot and the Virtual drive it created.
This all take a few of minutes at most to do, so is really impressive.
I am not to sure I would live snap shotting on my DC's with AD running or my SIM's server but have tried this on the print server and application server shutdown the old server and restarted the new VM I created from the snap shot everything worked fine really impressive.
I am not to sure if this is the same if you stop the server first, but I'll give it a go over the weekend.
7th August 2009, 11:50 PM #10
I've been using XenServer since 4.1 and 5.5 is brilliant. I've used it since it was released.
I configured Workload Balancing yesterday As a hint, don't use an underscore in the username
7th August 2009, 11:55 PM #11
Looking at setting up WLB in the next couple of weeks - thanks for the tip . One quick question I've been meaning to ask - what Linux distributions are you all using for your VMs?
Originally Posted by Ric_
17th August 2009, 08:04 PM #12
I have bonded two NICs on a xenserver and they're working fine but i'm a bit concerned that i've not got the switch ports configured correctly. I have a feeling that the ports on the switch should be in a static trunk to prevent mac flapping.
How do you all have your switches setup for your Xen NIC bonds?
17th August 2009, 09:10 PM #13
@Soulfish: I'm a Debian man (although I also have 1 CentOS VM)
@cookie_monster: I seem to remember that you just switch on LACP on the ports and it sorts it all out itself
17th August 2009, 09:17 PM #14
I setup LACP on the trunk to the SAN and that works well but the Xen bonds wouldn't work when setup as LACP (maybe the Xen side doesn't support LACP). I'll try a static trunk next time I get some downtime just wondering if anyone already has this setup, I might also try LACP again to rule out me having it set wrong last time as i'm more familiar with the XEN and the SAN now.
17th August 2009, 10:51 PM #15
Thanks Ric_ - I've actually ended up using CentOS for my new Linux VMs on Xen. I'm usually a debian man myself, but after playing with the XenServer CentOS for the past two weeks and since it seemed to be better supported I opted for that
@cookie_monster the default bonding mode is bonding-slb (mode 7) which I've struggled to find much on. What I have read (most of it is on the Citrix Xen Forums!) is that it doesn't require any switch support. According to XenServer Documentation traffic will only be going out over a single interface at a time so hopefully no problems will occur!
If you want to use another bonding mode (like LACP/802.3ad) then it is possible to modify the XenServer network scripts to use this, but it is an unsupported configuration .
Last edited by Soulfish; 17th August 2009 at 10:52 PM.
Reason: too many modes!
By wesleyw in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 3rd August 2009, 11:53 PM
By cookie_monster in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 8th July 2009, 10:31 AM
By EduTech in forum General Chat
Last Post: 25th August 2008, 10:28 PM
By callumtuckey in forum Mac
Last Post: 13th January 2007, 08:42 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)