Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, ESXi disk setup for SQL server VMs - advice sought in Technical; Hi folks,
Just after a bit of advice about the RAID hard drive setup on a new physical host we ...
-
28th January 2009, 01:11 PM #1
- Rep Power
- 12
ESXi disk setup for SQL server VMs - advice sought
Hi folks,
Just after a bit of advice about the RAID hard drive setup on a new physical host we are putting in to run a couple of virtual SQL servers. I am looking at putting in a Dell 2950 with 16gb RAM (with space for another 16gb taking it to 32gb) and a lot of direct attached storage. My question is really around the RAID config. I am looking at running possibly 3 machines at needing about 300-500gb each storage each.
I know for physical servers we try to setup the system, transaction logs and data files on separate disks. Some of our servers were split between two raid controllers and a number of physical disks. Do we still need to plan the virtual machines along the same lines. I was thinking that we do not need to set them up in the same manner as the underlying physical setup is different. I am thinking about putting the system os on a 20gb partition and a massic 300gb data partition.
At the moment we do not have a budget for shared storage but I am hoping we can get something sorted in the next few months.
I am thinking about whether to go with RAID 5 (5 or 6 x 1tb SAS or SATA drive) or RAID 1+0 with a number of 1TB drives. What setup is going to give me the best performance? I have heard stuff about the more spindles the better. I'm assuming spindles means drives!
We are going to be converting/migrating 2 machines that are running on dual AMD 2218 2.6ghz with 4gb RAM on direct storage. Just run a few sql counters over one of the boxes and it is averaging between 60-100 transactions per second the other box is averaging about 350 per sec. We are also looking at upgrading SQL from 2000 to 2005.
Any tips and ideas gratefully received
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
28th January 2009, 04:57 PM #2 If you're after performance, 5-6 raid5 15k SAS would be the way to go and is recommended with ESXi for SQL drives.
-
-
29th January 2009, 12:34 PM #3 Be careful with using DAS on ESXi.
Why? Because ESXi is not very good at moving VM's around between storage devices. If your using DAS and your raid card failed, or motherboard, you could be looking at lengthy downtime while the server is repaired.
If you use iSCSI SAN you will not be reliant on your server hardware, i.e if your server fails, you could simply unplug it from the SAN and then plug another totally different server in and get it up and running fairly quickly with little down time.
Butuz
-
SHARE:
Similar Threads
-
By TechSupp in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Replies: 4
Last Post: 22nd January 2009, 08:42 AM
-
By Zoom7000 in forum Windows Server 2008
Replies: 9
Last Post: 17th July 2008, 11:43 AM
-
By Gerry in forum Windows
Replies: 4
Last Post: 6th July 2008, 11:49 PM
-
By netadmin in forum Networks
Replies: 5
Last Post: 21st May 2008, 02:43 PM
-
By ChrisH in forum Networks
Replies: 18
Last Post: 4th December 2007, 03:41 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules