Welcome, Register for free! or Login below:
EduGeek.net RSS Feeds Register FAQ Members Social Groups User Map Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thin Client and Virtual Machines

Thin Client forum sponsored by
Thin Client Forum Sponsored by Idealstor

Virtual computing in a thin forum.

Go Back   EduGeek.net Forums > Technical > Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search Thread
Sponsored Links
Old 17-11-2008, 09:29 PM   #1
 
techyphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 293
uk
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 5 techyphil is on a distinguished road
Default More virtualisation questions :)

I'm wanting to go down the VMWare route to virtualise our current servers onto some meaty new ones.

We are looking at 3 powerful servers but i'm not sure about the following...

Does VMWare ESX Server allow Tape Drives to be seen by windows and if so is there a compatibility list or is it pretty generic?

What VMWare software do you have? VMMotion etc?

How do you backup these vmdisks? Do you snapshot them and only backup the snapshot files and keep an original seperate or something?

Have you experiences any issues with it. Things you have'nt been able to do that you can with a physical box. I get the idea that you've got faster recovery and you can go snapshot instantly. But having 2-4 OS's on one box also means you've got all your eggs in one basket. :S

Just need an idea how you run your virtual infrastructure really...



Thanks for any advice
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 10:12 PM   #2
 
ChrisH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East Lancs
Posts: 4,187
uk uk lancashire
Thanks: 8
Thanked 60 Times in 53 Posts
Rep Power: 27 ChrisH is a jewel in the roughChrisH is a jewel in the roughChrisH is a jewel in the roughChrisH is a jewel in the rough
Default

If your going down the route of putting important servers onto VMware you will need hardware and software failover. This will mean another server ready to take over from a failing server and using Vmotion which will mean ££££ license costs. You will also need some centralised storage as well like a SAN.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 10:25 PM   #3
 
DMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,188
uk uk isle of wight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 170 Times in 153 Posts
Rep Power: 42 DMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisH View Post
If your going down the route of putting important servers onto VMware you will need hardware and software failover. This will mean another server ready to take over from a failing server and using Vmotion which will mean ££££ license costs. You will also need some centralised storage as well like a SAN.
You don't *have* to use high availability, although you will probably want vmotion which is not part of standard, I still have standard + vmotion as a legacy from 2.5 licensing.

Nor do you need a spare server for example, just sufficient capacity to spread the load to those that remain.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 10:31 PM   #4
 
DMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,188
uk uk isle of wight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 170 Times in 153 Posts
Rep Power: 42 DMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by techyphil View Post
I'm wanting to go down the VMWare route to virtualise our current servers onto some meaty new ones.

We are looking at 3 powerful servers but i'm not sure about the following...

Does VMWare ESX Server allow Tape Drives to be seen by windows and if so is there a compatibility list or is it pretty generic?

What VMWare software do you have? VMMotion etc?

How do you backup these vmdisks? Do you snapshot them and only backup the snapshot files and keep an original seperate or something?

Have you experiences any issues with it. Things you have'nt been able to do that you can with a physical box. I get the idea that you've got faster recovery and you can go snapshot instantly. But having 2-4 OS's on one box also means you've got all your eggs in one basket. :S

Just need an idea how you run your virtual infrastructure really...



Thanks for any advice
Vmware ESX has some pretty strict compatability requirements, the supported hardware is listed on the site. I think scsi passthru may be supported but can be a headache to get working.

Using ESX standard + VMotion and VirtualCenter. Backing up with traditional OS agents for now, looking to export the images with backup exec 12.5 in the future (if I can get it any cheaper). Occasionally export the disk images to nas.

Snapshots are useful, but you don't want to leave one open continuously for example as it will create a massive redo log and effect performance.


http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/mic...200%2049359708

Last edited by DMcCoy; 17-11-2008 at 10:39 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2008, 11:17 PM   #5
 
techyphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 293
uk
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 5 techyphil is on a distinguished road
Default

Yeh i'm not looking for mass failover hardware. Have 40% load ideally on each server averaged out and then move VM's across should we need to take one offline.

What spec SAN's are you using and is it using FC or iSCSI or something else?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 09:56 AM   #6
 
ittech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 702
england
Thanks: 47
Thanked 23 Times in 22 Posts
Rep Power: 9 ittech will become famous soon enoughittech will become famous soon enough
Default

Just out of interest why would anyone want to virtulize important servers? Doesn't that increase the likelihood of you loosing a significant part of your network if the hardware fails?

Personally I would much prefer multiple servers so if one died I could get it back and running pretty quickly.

Maybe I'm missing something?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 10:17 AM   #7
 
dhicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Alton, Hampshire
Posts: 2,142
uk
Thanks: 245
Thanked 202 Times in 172 Posts
Rep Power: 54 dhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud ofdhicks has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ittech View Post
Just out of interest why would anyone want to virtulize important servers?
To decrease the likelihood of you loosing a significant part of your network if the hardware fails. If the hardware running a VM conks out you simply start up a copy of that VM on a different physical server. We have our servers set up to mirror VMs between separate physical machines in real time, so should one server explode another can take over in seconds (ish) with no loss of data (ish).

--
David Hicks
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 10:33 AM   #8
 
Ric_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 6,256
uk uk lancashire
Thanks: 50
Thanked 310 Times in 242 Posts
Rep Power: 76 Ric_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to Ric_ Send a message via Skype™ to Ric_
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhicks View Post
To decrease the likelihood of you loosing a significant part of your network if the hardware fails. If the hardware running a VM conks out you simply start up a copy of that VM on a different physical server. We have our servers set up to mirror VMs between separate physical machines in real time, so should one server explode another can take over in seconds (ish) with no loss of data (ish).
As you say, HA (High Availability) and DR (Disaster Recovery) are the major reasons for virtualisation. With the correct infrastructure, your only downtime would be the time taken to restart a VM on a new bit of tin - this can be done automagically too!

You'll see my posts dotted about... I chose Citrix XenServer because it saved me large wads of cash over VMWare. XenServer 5.0 features HA, XenMotion (live moving of VMs between hosts) and all manner of goodies - plus less licensing restrictions than VMWare!

Only 'problem' with XenServer is that you can't expose a LUN (e.g. volume on a SAN or tape drive) to a VM but it isn't a disaster. With something like Sun's openstorage solution you can attach your tape library to your storage solution.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 10:35 AM   #9
 
DMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,188
uk uk isle of wight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 170 Times in 153 Posts
Rep Power: 42 DMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to behold
Default

Hardware independence, snapshots (so you can patch and revert if it fails for example). Templates for deploying new servers in a few minutes.

I can upgrade my blades and the ESX OS without any end user disruption by migrating the machines as needed.

Not that this is not without issues (Windows licensing for example, although MS applications have had their rules relaxed slightly).
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 11:06 AM   #10
 
wesleyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,502
uk
Thanks: 85
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 13 wesleyw will become famous soon enough
Default

Ric being completely new to virtualisation what do you mean by expose a vm to a volume? you mean they can't be directly connected to one or something else?
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 11:31 AM   #11
 
Theblacksheep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In a house.
Posts: 380
uk
Thanks: 22
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
Rep Power: 10 Theblacksheep has a spectacular aura aboutTheblacksheep has a spectacular aura aboutTheblacksheep has a spectacular aura about
Default

vmotion seems to have moved into the 'enterprise' V3 pricing band.

Anyone use VDI? As the bundle seems worth getting if you are thinking of getting V3 standard.

Last edited by Theblacksheep; 18-11-2008 at 11:37 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 11:37 AM   #12
 
Ric_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 6,256
uk uk lancashire
Thanks: 50
Thanked 310 Times in 242 Posts
Rep Power: 76 Ric_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to Ric_ Send a message via Skype™ to Ric_
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wesleyw View Post
Ric being completely new to virtualisation what do you mean by expose a vm to a volume? you mean they can't be directly connected to one or something else?
The way SANs work, you tell the SAN to make a LUN (bit of disk space) available to a server and it sees that like it's a local device.

XenServer (currently) does not allow LUNs to appear directly to VMs, instead you need to expose the LUN to the hsot and create virtual disks.

It is for this same reason that you cannot expose a tape library to a VM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 11:38 AM   #13
 
Ric_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 6,256
uk uk lancashire
Thanks: 50
Thanked 310 Times in 242 Posts
Rep Power: 76 Ric_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant futureRic_ has a brilliant future
Send a message via MSN to Ric_ Send a message via Skype™ to Ric_
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Theblacksheep View Post
vmotion seems to have moved into the 'enterprise' esx pricing band.

Anyone use VDI? As the bundle seems worth getting if you are thinking of getting V3 standard.
VMotion was one of the features I wanted from virtualisation... hence why I chose XenServer (Enterprise has XenMotion) and saved over £3k!
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 11:57 AM   #14
 
Theblacksheep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In a house.
Posts: 380
uk
Thanks: 22
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
Rep Power: 10 Theblacksheep has a spectacular aura aboutTheblacksheep has a spectacular aura aboutTheblacksheep has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric_ View Post
VMotion was one of the features I wanted from virtualisation... hence why I chose XenServer (Enterprise has XenMotion) and saved over £3k!
Do you also use Xen desktop and does this also require additional TS licencing? Or like VDI is it a standalone virtual desktop provider?

Can you log into a VM via the web? (provide VM desktops to home)?

thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2008, 12:01 PM   #15
 
wesleyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Walsall
Posts: 1,502
uk
Thanks: 85
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 13 wesleyw will become famous soon enough
Default

You'd need TS cals for XenApp as its the new name for Presentation server.

Wes
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Virtualisation for Dummies RabbieBurns General Chat 0 31-07-2008 01:51 AM
Server Virtualisation dezt Thin Client and Virtual Machines 6 28-04-2008 03:20 PM
New Virtualisation PC Zoom7000 Thin Client and Virtual Machines 7 28-04-2008 03:12 PM
£45k for virtualisation? sidewinder Hardware 4 02-04-2008 11:33 AM
virtualisation ? mac_shinobi Mac 5 06-02-2008 02:49 PM


Tags
vmware infrastructure.


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright EduGeek.net




website uptime

© 2005 - 2009 EduGeek.net
no new posts