Welcome, Register for free! or Login below:
EduGeek.net RSS Feeds Register FAQ Members Social Groups User Map Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thin Client and Virtual Machines

Thin Client forum sponsored by
Thin Client Forum Sponsored by Idealstor

Virtual computing in a thin forum.

Go Back   EduGeek.net Forums > Technical > Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Search Thread
Sponsored Links
Old 27-03-2008, 09:45 AM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1
 
Gatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,976
uk uk scotland
Thanks: 176
Thanked 93 Times in 71 Posts
Rep Power: 42 Gatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via MSN to Gatt
Default Virtualisation Servers

Was asked this morning to investigate the Pro's/Con's of Virtualisation of our Network to try and consolidate as many of our existing servers into Virtual Servers..

What servers have hardware Virtualisation support?
How much?
what Spec should I look at?

The other poser is what roles are suitable for virtualising?
DC, WDS, WSUS, SQL, File-Servers, etc, etc..
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2008, 10:51 AM   #2
 
SYNACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,729
new zealand
Thanks: 115
Thanked 614 Times in 501 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 127 SYNACK ooh
SYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK ooh
Send a message via MSN to SYNACK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatt View Post
Was asked this morning to investigate the Pro's/Con's of Virtualisation of our Network to try and consolidate as many of our existing servers into Virtual Servers..

What servers have hardware Virtualisation support?
How much?
what Spec should I look at?

The other poser is what roles are suitable for virtualising?
DC, WDS, WSUS, SQL, File-Servers, etc, etc..
Almost all new servers contain virtualisation support thanks to the latest revision of CPUs. New core2 based Xeons and current Opterons have built it support.

As to spec, lots of ram 8GB, a couple of quad core CPUs and some quick storage will do quite well for 6 or so vservers depending on loading requirements.

You may want two of these rigs for redundancy as if your one virtual server blows something it will take out your whole system.

A SAN is the best as you can have both VM servers storing their images on the SAN but short of that a reasonable RAID controller with a stack of cache (512mb) would be a good idea.

You can virtualise any of the roles that you suggest above, if you go for the SAN option it may be faster to host files directly off that.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SYNACK For This Useful Post:
Gatt (27-03-2008)
Old 27-03-2008, 10:56 AM   #3
 
Gatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,976
uk uk scotland
Thanks: 176
Thanked 93 Times in 71 Posts
Rep Power: 42 Gatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to beholdGatt is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via MSN to Gatt
Default

Cheers for that..

was thinking of about 16GB ram? and prob a Tb of disk space but will look into the SAN option too

Will need to get prices too - probably gonna be some form of HP ProLiant
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2008, 11:21 AM   #4
 
DMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,187
uk uk isle of wight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 170 Times in 153 Posts
Rep Power: 42 DMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to behold
Default

One thing to remember is that consolidation only works with your *unused* capacity. There are additional benefits depending on what software you use though. Template machines, imaging etc. If you don't have enough servers to keep up then it doesn't get you very far - first thing is to check cpu/ram stats for current servers before planning.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2008, 11:25 AM   #5
 
srochford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 1,697
uk
Thanks: 9
Thanked 200 Times in 178 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47 srochford has much to be proud ofsrochford has much to be proud ofsrochford has much to be proud ofsrochford has much to be proud ofsrochford has much to be proud ofsrochford has much to be proud ofsrochford has much to be proud ofsrochford has much to be proud of
Default

Working backwards, you can virtualise anything although if it uses special hardware you are likely to have problems.

functions like DC, DHCP, WSUS are very light in terms of CPU, RAM, HDD so can go as a virtual server in a "spare corner".

One of the real benefits of virtualisation is ease of backup. We're only using MS Virtual Server but I'm pretty sure VMWare has similar facilities. What we do is to pause the server in the middle of the night, copy the virtual disc and config files to another server and then resume it. Should the host system fail, it's a job of a few minutes to bring up the guest OS on another machine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2008, 11:31 AM   #6
 
DMcCoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 2,187
uk uk isle of wight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 170 Times in 153 Posts
Rep Power: 42 DMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to beholdDMcCoy is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by srochford View Post
Working backwards, you can virtualise anything although if it uses special hardware you are likely to have problems.

functions like DC, DHCP, WSUS are very light in terms of CPU, RAM, HDD so can go as a virtual server in a "spare corner".

One of the real benefits of virtualisation is ease of backup. We're only using MS Virtual Server but I'm pretty sure VMWare has similar facilities. What we do is to pause the server in the middle of the night, copy the virtual disc and config files to another server and then resume it. Should the host system fail, it's a job of a few minutes to bring up the guest OS on another machine.
With ESX you can create a redo log that leave the machine running but locks the disk file for backup without pausing/powering off. A crash consistent state - fine for most things, not so good for databases.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2008, 11:32 AM   #7
 
SYNACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 2,729
new zealand
Thanks: 115
Thanked 614 Times in 501 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 127 SYNACK ooh
SYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK oohSYNACK ooh
Send a message via MSN to SYNACK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatt View Post
Cheers for that..

was thinking of about 16GB ram? and prob a Tb of disk space but will look into the SAN option too

Will need to get prices too - probably gonna be some form of HP ProLiant
Yeap, the ram is all dependent on your servers requirements, ie exchange2k7 4gb + File 1-2GB + DC 1GB etc. likewise with the HD space. The big thing is the HD throughput as the HDs are usually a bottleneck when just used by a single system, VMs each make the same demand on the HDs speed.

We got recommended an hp DL380 by one of our suppliers for a VM server starter. They are really nice units, we've got one with a couple of quad cores in it + 512MB raid controller and it is very fast at what we have tasked it with. In our case its not VMs though so I can't elaborate on its VMing speed from personal experience.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Virtualisation Kit - your recommendation. Paid_Peanuts Hardware 12 04-03-2008 05:26 PM
virtualisation ? mac_shinobi Mac 5 06-02-2008 02:49 PM
IBM 335 servers wesleyw How do you do....it? 4 19-07-2007 10:01 AM
Disaster recovery with virtualisation sidewinder Windows 6 30-04-2007 01:28 PM
What should I do with my new servers? sidewinder Networks 12 21-11-2006 10:35 PM



LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.edugeek.net/forums/thin-client-virtual-machines/17311-virtualisation-servers.html
Posted By For Type Date
Thin Client and Virtual Machines: Blogs, Photos, Videos and more on Technorati This thread Refback 14-04-2008 03:54 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search Thread
Search Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright EduGeek.net




website uptime

© 2005 - 2009 EduGeek.net
no new posts