Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, VMware/Virtual servers? in Technical; I've heard of VMware before but not really thought of the idea of giving it a go until now. The ...
30th January 2008, 04:15 PM #1
I've heard of VMware before but not really thought of the idea of giving it a go until now. The thought of clearing all the servers out & virtualising it sounds good to me!
I am novice, can someone explain the basic principle. I understand you have 1 main server, & you can run endless virtual ones from it? How is it possible to store so much data, where is it stored?
IDG Tech News
30th January 2008, 04:33 PM #2
30th January 2008, 04:36 PM #3
- Rep Power
you basic premise is spot on, you build a fairly high spec server, install O/S and SP's drivers etc then install vmware or MS virtual server and then you can add any number of servers inside flat files, which can then me moved around etc.
the data is stored in virtual hard drives, which increases the size of the virtual machine or you can use networked drives etc.
your best bet (picture paints a thousand words) download and install and play about, you will soon get the hang of it.
At its most complex you can virtualise current physical servers and install something like esx and manage the lot via a web browser.
30th January 2008, 04:45 PM #4
A properly-configured Linux server as the host OS will use less resources than Windows and lead to better VMWare guest OS performance.
30th January 2008, 04:45 PM #5
Originally Posted by Uraken
Virtual harddrives? The space available is endless then?
30th January 2008, 04:50 PM #6
30th January 2008, 04:51 PM #7
no , the virtual machines each take a share of the host computer be it hard drive space, ram, or processor.
Originally Posted by flashsnaps
Whats good about virtual machines is how independent the services become from the hardware. So for isnance if you had 2 servers now and one went down u'd be stuck, with virtual machines you'd move the file to another server, fire it up and your server would be ready to go.
30th January 2008, 04:51 PM #8
No, you are just partitioning your normal server to make use of free capacity. It's not magic
Originally Posted by flashsnaps
It's useful for consolidation and management, if you don't already have enough hardware capacity it's not going to help at all.
30th January 2008, 05:04 PM #9
Obviously ESX (plus SAN) would be the best "money-no-object" option
I can't lay my hands on figures at the moment but it goes without saying that possibility of running a host operating system (eg Linux) without a wasteful GUI, antivirus software, automatic reboots after updates without warning, and being able to scale it down to the bare minimum will be a great advantage to running virtual machines. Linux also has it's support of many suitable filesystems on its side whereas Windows has ...... FAT or NTFS
30th January 2008, 09:48 PM #10
I may be looking at server virtualization in the future, would the best course of action be to build a big server up with a beefy processor, or two, add lots of RAM and masive hard drive space.
Probably 2 x dual or quad core xeons, 4Gb Ram and 1Tb hard drive space, would that be good enough for about 4 servers, maybe 6?
30th January 2008, 10:47 PM #11
dezt, might be worth getting 2 servers so you have some rudundcy. Best suggestion is get 2 of the servers ict-direct are doing. You'll also need to get some serious backup sorted out, as if your hdd fails in a server you might stand to lose upto 4 servers!.
Thanks to strawberry from:
30th January 2008, 11:21 PM #12
- Rep Power
A couple of people are talking about using beefy processors. Before you do look at what virtual hosts you want to be running.
For example I'm looking at virtualizing a fair few servers and I know that several of them are running applications that are in effect file servers and use very little processing power. The random access time of the RAM, HDD and network bandwidth are more important.
As with all school ICT, it comes down to budgets and if you're going to use a SAN to host the virtual harddrives.
MS also provide a whitepaper detailing the trade offs about running your DCs in a virtual environment.
31st January 2008, 10:28 AM #13
It depends what you're going to do on each of the virtual machines. We bought a server of similar specification from Dell (just less than £2000) to run our thin clients, very similar to virtual machines. It runs 20+ thin clients simultaneously.
Originally Posted by dezt
31st January 2008, 10:35 AM #14
can either VMWare or Virtual Server be run on Windows 2008 yet?
31st January 2008, 10:43 AM #15
- Rep Power
Does anyone know if there is going to be any price difference between Server 2008 with Hyper-V and Server 2008 withOUT Hyper-V? I believe they have different SKUs so I'm guessing there will be. Also since we're talking about using possibly more than 4Gb RAM you can use Server 2008 x64 STD to with upto 32Gb.
By plexer in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
Last Post: 24th August 2007, 10:03 AM
By russdev in forum Web Development
Last Post: 11th May 2007, 10:46 AM
By Dos_Box in forum Downloads
Last Post: 30th March 2006, 02:12 PM
By altecsole in forum How do you do....it?
Last Post: 12th December 2005, 10:40 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)