+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, VMware/Virtual servers? in Technical; I've heard of VMware before but not really thought of the idea of giving it a go until now. The ...
  1. #1
    flashsnaps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex
    Posts
    442
    Thank Post
    12
    Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    16

    VMware/Virtual servers?

    I've heard of VMware before but not really thought of the idea of giving it a go until now. The thought of clearing all the servers out & virtualising it sounds good to me!

    I am novice, can someone explain the basic principle. I understand you have 1 main server, & you can run endless virtual ones from it? How is it possible to store so much data, where is it stored?

    Thank You

  2. #2

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,842
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 592 Times in 513 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    226
    You use a SAN.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    494
    Thank Post
    19
    Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    17
    you basic premise is spot on, you build a fairly high spec server, install O/S and SP's drivers etc then install vmware or MS virtual server and then you can add any number of servers inside flat files, which can then me moved around etc.
    the data is stored in virtual hard drives, which increases the size of the virtual machine or you can use networked drives etc.
    your best bet (picture paints a thousand words) download and install and play about, you will soon get the hang of it.

    At its most complex you can virtualise current physical servers and install something like esx and manage the lot via a web browser.

  4. #4

    webman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    8,414
    Thank Post
    642
    Thanked 964 Times in 664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    327
    A properly-configured Linux server as the host OS will use less resources than Windows and lead to better VMWare guest OS performance.

  5. #5
    flashsnaps's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex
    Posts
    442
    Thank Post
    12
    Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Uraken View Post
    you basic premise is spot on, you build a fairly high spec server, install O/S and SP's drivers etc then install vmware or MS virtual server and then you can add any number of servers inside flat files, which can then me moved around etc.
    the data is stored in virtual hard drives, which increases the size of the virtual machine or you can use networked drives etc.
    your best bet (picture paints a thousand words) download and install and play about, you will soon get the hang of it.

    At its most complex you can virtualise current physical servers and install something like esx and manage the lot via a web browser.
    Thanks

    Virtual harddrives? The space available is endless then?

  6. #6
    DMcCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Isle of Wight
    Posts
    3,487
    Thank Post
    10
    Thanked 502 Times in 442 Posts
    Rep Power
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by webman View Post
    A properly-configured Linux server as the host OS will use less resources than Windows and lead to better VMWare guest OS performance.
    Numbers please

    Or you could remove linux from the equation too with ESX

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,839
    Thank Post
    90
    Thanked 316 Times in 241 Posts
    Rep Power
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by flashsnaps View Post
    Thanks

    Virtual harddrives? The space available is endless then?
    no , the virtual machines each take a share of the host computer be it hard drive space, ram, or processor.

    Whats good about virtual machines is how independent the services become from the hardware. So for isnance if you had 2 servers now and one went down u'd be stuck, with virtual machines you'd move the file to another server, fire it up and your server would be ready to go.

  8. #8
    DMcCoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Isle of Wight
    Posts
    3,487
    Thank Post
    10
    Thanked 502 Times in 442 Posts
    Rep Power
    114
    Quote Originally Posted by flashsnaps View Post
    Thanks

    Virtual harddrives? The space available is endless then?
    No, you are just partitioning your normal server to make use of free capacity. It's not magic

    It's useful for consolidation and management, if you don't already have enough hardware capacity it's not going to help at all.

  9. #9

    webman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    8,414
    Thank Post
    642
    Thanked 964 Times in 664 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    327
    Obviously ESX (plus SAN) would be the best "money-no-object" option

    I can't lay my hands on figures at the moment but it goes without saying that possibility of running a host operating system (eg Linux) without a wasteful GUI, antivirus software, automatic reboots after updates without warning, and being able to scale it down to the bare minimum will be a great advantage to running virtual machines. Linux also has it's support of many suitable filesystems on its side whereas Windows has ...... FAT or NTFS

  10. #10
    dezt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lancs
    Posts
    1,031
    Thank Post
    157
    Thanked 60 Times in 48 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    I may be looking at server virtualization in the future, would the best course of action be to build a big server up with a beefy processor, or two, add lots of RAM and masive hard drive space.

    Probably 2 x dual or quad core xeons, 4Gb Ram and 1Tb hard drive space, would that be good enough for about 4 servers, maybe 6?

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,839
    Thank Post
    90
    Thanked 316 Times in 241 Posts
    Rep Power
    90
    dezt, might be worth getting 2 servers so you have some rudundcy. Best suggestion is get 2 of the servers ict-direct are doing. You'll also need to get some serious backup sorted out, as if your hdd fails in a server you might stand to lose upto 4 servers!.

  12. Thanks to strawberry from:

    dezt (31st January 2008)

  13. #12

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    198
    Thank Post
    19
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Rep Power
    16
    A couple of people are talking about using beefy processors. Before you do look at what virtual hosts you want to be running.

    For example I'm looking at virtualizing a fair few servers and I know that several of them are running applications that are in effect file servers and use very little processing power. The random access time of the RAM, HDD and network bandwidth are more important.

    As with all school ICT, it comes down to budgets and if you're going to use a SAN to host the virtual harddrives.

    MS also provide a whitepaper detailing the trade offs about running your DCs in a virtual environment.

  14. #13

    dhicks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Knightsbridge
    Posts
    5,688
    Thank Post
    1,271
    Thanked 791 Times in 688 Posts
    Rep Power
    238
    Quote Originally Posted by dezt View Post
    Probably 2 x dual or quad core xeons, 4Gb Ram and 1Tb hard drive space, would that be good enough for about 4 servers, maybe 6?
    It depends what you're going to do on each of the virtual machines. We bought a server of similar specification from Dell (just less than £2000) to run our thin clients, very similar to virtual machines. It runs 20+ thin clients simultaneously.

    --
    David Hicks

  15. #14

    Gatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,774
    Thank Post
    873
    Thanked 674 Times in 443 Posts
    Rep Power
    503
    can either VMWare or Virtual Server be run on Windows 2008 yet?

  16. #15

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    198
    Thank Post
    19
    Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
    Rep Power
    16
    Haven't tried.

    Does anyone know if there is going to be any price difference between Server 2008 with Hyper-V and Server 2008 withOUT Hyper-V? I believe they have different SKUs so I'm guessing there will be. Also since we're talking about using possibly more than 4Gb RAM you can use Server 2008 x64 STD to with upto 32Gb.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Moving VMWare Virtual Server Files
    By plexer in forum Thin Client and Virtual Machines
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24th August 2007, 10:03 AM
  2. Virtual Servers Hosting
    By russdev in forum Web Development
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11th May 2007, 10:46 AM
  3. VMWare Preconfigured Virtual PCs'
    By Dos_Box in forum Downloads
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 30th March 2006, 02:12 PM
  4. VMWare or Virtual PC?
    By altecsole in forum How do you do....it?
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12th December 2005, 10:40 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •