+ Post New Thread
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456789 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 121
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Whether to virtualise our main servers in Technical; I run multiple RDS servers in VMs very successfully. Hyper-V is specifically optimised to handle it in fact, like Xen ...
  1. #76

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    17,879
    Thank Post
    518
    Thanked 2,486 Times in 1,928 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    838
    I run multiple RDS servers in VMs very successfully. Hyper-V is specifically optimised to handle it in fact, like Xen Server is optimised to handle XenApp.

  2. Thanks to localzuk from:

    Jollity (6th February 2014)

  3. #77
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,829
    Thank Post
    918
    Thanked 422 Times in 355 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by localzuk View Post
    I run multiple RDS servers in VMs very successfully. Hyper-V is specifically optimised to handle it in fact, like Xen Server is optimised to handle XenApp.
    Yeh we run a Remote Desktop Server here over Hyper-V and it works perfectly.

  4. Thanks to zag from:

    Jollity (6th February 2014)

  5. #78

    fiza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,169
    Thank Post
    430
    Thanked 314 Times in 265 Posts
    Rep Power
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by tmcd35 View Post
    Won't go in to specifics as the CPU(s) was end of line and I badgered heavily on price But it's from @VeryPC. Novtech have managed similar for me in the past. Both good bespoke manufacturers who know how to treat their customers.


    As far as I am aware that's still true. Sounds like a bonkers thing to try IMHO. Bear in mind I was talking about running Terminal Server in a VM which doesn't rely on Hyper-V.
    My mistake - confusion reigns in my head at the moment. As the thread was about virtualising I assumed you meant Hyperv.

  6. #79

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    217
    Thank Post
    260
    Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
    Rep Power
    11
    Let's see if I have learned anything. Any thoughts on the plan I have come up with would be valued.

    The omens suggest the finance gods are in fairly favourable mood, so I am pitching for a more Seawolf-solution, but I may fall back on a more Glenda-solution if things are looking dicey. I am going to try and sell getting two powerful main servers now as an alternative to replacing the current (rather underutilised) MIS database and web servers, and absorb their roles on the main servers. I plan to use the current web server as a backup server with Microsoft DPM and use one of current main servers as a dedicated physical DC (until it dies of old age at least).

    The main servers would be Hyper-V hosts, have identical specs and each should be able to run one of each of the essential virtual machines on its own. The files would be replicated between the two virtual file servers using DFSR as they are currently. I have divided the server roles up as follows:
    Roles Number needed Essential? Memory (GB) System Disk Space (GB)
    host operating system 2 TRUE 4 80
    File 2 TRUE 6 80 Separate RAID 5 array for files - passthrough to VM.
    DC, DHCP, DNS 2 TRUE 3 80
    Print 1 TRUE 4 100
    WSUS, internal
    web apps
    1 TRUE 4 80 Additional dynamic VHD for update files on SATA disk
    AV Management,
    Log Monitoring, Unifi Controller
    1 TRUE 4 100
    AV Updates
    only
    1 FALSE 2 100
    WDS 2 FALSE 6 160 Dynamic VHD
    Certificate
    Services
    1 TRUE 2 40 Server Core
    3Sys Web Server 1 TRUE 6 80
    PASS Database
    server
    1 TRUE 8 100

    I have been playing with specifications for a PowerEdge T620 on the Dell website, but I will get an equivalent quote for an HP M350p. Two main servers something like:
    2 x Intel® Xeon® E5-2620v2, 2.1GHz, 15M Cache, 7.2GT/s QPI, Turbo, HT, 6C, 80W, DDR3-1600MHz
    14 x 4GB UDIMM, 1600 MHz, Low Volt, Dual Rank, x8 Data Width - total RAM: 56GB
    PERC H710 Adapter RAID Controller, 512MB NV Cache
    System Array (for host and guest images): RAID 1 - 2 x 1.2TB, SAS 6Gbps, 2.5in, 10K RPM Hard Drive (Hot-plug)
    Data Array (passthrough to the file server): RAID 5 - 3 x 600GB, SAS 6Gbps, 2.5in, 10K RPM Hard Drive (Hot-Plug)
    Extras Disk (80GB for WSUS files, rest for previous versions files): 500GB, SATA, 2.5in, 7.2K RPM Hard Drive (Hot-Plug)
    Dual, Hot-plug, Redundant Power Supply (1+1), 750W, Titanium
    Additional network card: Broadcom 5720 DP 1Gb Network Interface Card
    5Yr ProSupport and Next Business Day On-Site Service

    Any suggestions? Would you divide up the roles differently? Anywhere you would you suggest increasing the specification? Anywhere I would be able to cut back if I have to?

    I have specified RAID 5 on the data disk as an additional layer of redundancy on top of replication to the other server by DFSR. Is this unnecessary? I have a colleague who is not keen on using RAID, so I will need to justify this.

  7. #80

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    332
    Thank Post
    160
    Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
    Rep Power
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by SkreeM1980 View Post
    Virtualisation is a total no brainer, modern servers are totally bored with the load of a standard windows server, just add more ram and make them run 10 or 12. I've got a big environment, but I would virtualise in any environment just for the benefits of role separation and the ability to add a new server for any new roles that come along.

    Veeam for backup is an absoloute marvel. Mine runs through about 6TB of servers every night in about 6 hours.

    What hardware do you backup to? 6 hours is good!

  8. #81

    glennda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    7,817
    Thank Post
    272
    Thanked 1,138 Times in 1,034 Posts
    Rep Power
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by Gardinho View Post
    What hardware do you backup to? 6 hours is good!
    With Veeam it depends on the rate of change so it could be running through 6TB but actually only backing up 30gb

  9. #82

    glennda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    7,817
    Thank Post
    272
    Thanked 1,138 Times in 1,034 Posts
    Rep Power
    350
    Any reason you need two file servers with DFSR?

    If you use Veeam as a backup tool instead of DPM you could instantly boot a failed file server if the requirement/need was there

  10. Thanks to glennda from:

    Jollity (24th February 2014)

  11. #83

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    332
    Thank Post
    160
    Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
    Rep Power
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by glennda View Post
    With Veeam it depends on the rate of change so it could be running through 6TB but actually only backing up 30gb
    This is true. We have FC connection to our backup server. A full backup (not differential) on a weekend normally takes us about 12 hours for 3TB. The bottleneck for us is the USB3 dual external drive. This works for us but quicker speeds would be nice at some stage.

  12. #84

    glennda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    7,817
    Thank Post
    272
    Thanked 1,138 Times in 1,034 Posts
    Rep Power
    350
    Quote Originally Posted by Gardinho View Post
    This is true. We have FC connection to our backup server. A full backup (not differential) on a weekend normally takes us about 12 hours for 3TB. The bottleneck for us is the USB3 dual external drive. This works for us but quicker speeds would be nice at some stage.
    Do you use Veeam? What transport methods do you use? USB3.0 should be able in theory write 5GBs/S to a disk so the bottleneck is probably the Sata drive in the device.

    With My clients I setup Veeam with Direct SAN access (for VMware) and Local storage in the Backup server. And then Servers are also replicated offsite.

    EDIT: Does Veeam with Hyper-V have any change block tracking?

  13. #85

    seawolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    969
    Thank Post
    12
    Thanked 285 Times in 217 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by Jollity View Post
    Let's see if I have learned anything. Any thoughts on the plan I have come up with would be

    I have been playing with specifications for a PowerEdge T620 on the Dell website, but I will get an equivalent quote for an HP M350p. Two main servers something like:
    2 x Intel® Xeon® E5-2620v2, 2.1GHz, 15M Cache, 7.2GT/s QPI, Turbo, HT, 6C, 80W, DDR3-1600MHz
    14 x 4GB UDIMM, 1600 MHz, Low Volt, Dual Rank, x8 Data Width - total RAM: 56GB
    PERC H710 Adapter RAID Controller, 512MB NV Cache
    System Array (for host and guest images): RAID 1 - 2 x 1.2TB, SAS 6Gbps, 2.5in, 10K RPM Hard Drive (Hot-plug)
    Data Array (passthrough to the file server): RAID 5 - 3 x 600GB, SAS 6Gbps, 2.5in, 10K RPM Hard Drive (Hot-Plug)
    Extras Disk (80GB for WSUS files, rest for previous versions files): 500GB, SATA, 2.5in, 7.2K RPM Hard Drive (Hot-Plug)
    Dual, Hot-plug, Redundant Power Supply (1+1), 750W, Titanium
    Additional network card: Broadcom 5720 DP 1Gb Network Interface Card
    5Yr ProSupport and Next Business Day On-Site Service

    Any suggestions? Would you divide up the roles differently? Anywhere you would you suggest increasing the specification? Anywhere I would be able to cut back if I have to?

    I have specified RAID 5 on the data disk as an additional layer of redundancy on top of replication to the other server by DFSR. Is this unnecessary? I have a colleague who is not keen on using RAID, so I will need to justify this.
    I only have a few comments, but overall this looks pretty good.

    1. I would never use RAID5 except for backup storage as I find is too unreliable for primary storage. You didn't specify whether you planned to use a hot spare or not. If you do plan to, don't. Besides my own experience (and others I know) with RAID5, technical reasons for not using it:

    http://www.smbitjournal.com/2012/07/...or-a-hot-mess/
    http://miracleas.com/BAARF/RAID5_versus_RAID10.txt

    So, what to use instead? RAID10 ideally, but if not in your budget at least use RAID6, it only costs you one more drive.

    2. Of the other specs I might bump up if the money were there, it would be the CPUs and NICs.

    NICs - how many total NICs will you have? You should aim for 6-8 per server ideally. If I had to choose between more CPU grunt and more 1Gb NICs in a virtualisation solution, I would spend the money on the extra NICs.

    CPUs - I would go for E-2650s for the extra two cores (if I could afford them), which can become important in virtualisation. If budget doesn't allow, the 2620s will certainly suffice unless you experience a lot of growth.

    As for the roles of the VM servers, your plan looks good. I do question the need for the AV management server and AV update servers to be on their own separate servers. We combine those here. Also, I think it would be OK to run the print server on one of your file servers with the number of clients you have, shouldn't be a problem at all.

    3. Re-purposing older servers is a great plan. We do the same and it is partially this process over time that allows you to build up a rack or two of great kit. If you buy quality, well spec'd servers, they are still useful after 4-5 years in non-mission critical roles, especially of you have a spare one of similar spec to fire up if something goes down. Our backup server now runs on one of our 4.5 year old previous ESXi hosts, so it is a very well spec'd backup server, which means backups run fast!

    4. What do you plan to use for backup storage? This is the one place where RAID5 using good quality SATA drives (WD SE for instance) can be used relatively safely and save you a few dollars. Another option is to do what we did, build your own server with at least 4 drives, 16GB+ RAM and install FreeNAS for rock solid ZFS backup storage. If you have an older server with several SATA drive bays then you have a great inexpensive backup storage solution as long as you use quality drives.

  14. Thanks to seawolf from:

    Jollity (24th February 2014)

  15. #86

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    332
    Thank Post
    160
    Thanked 28 Times in 25 Posts
    Rep Power
    36
    Yes we use Veeam v6.1. We have direct SAN access too, backing up 20 odd VMs from 3 ESXi hosts.

    I'd love to add a 4th host to our VMWare infrastructure but the licence pricing for this is complicated. I haven't yet got my head around it.

    To be honest I'm not too concerned about the write speeds as we are well within the allotted time for completing backups. I think our Veeam processes at about 200MB so I can't complain.

  16. #87

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    217
    Thank Post
    260
    Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by glennda View Post
    Any reason you need two file servers with DFSR?

    If you use Veeam as a backup tool instead of DPM you could instantly boot a failed file server if the requirement/need was there
    It is a fair question, and I will think more about the alternative.

    A significant reason is perhaps that this is what we do currently. It has the advantage of also splitting the load, but I do not really know that this is necessary. It means no technician action is required if one server goes down, though there is a slowdown while the connections to the server that's down time out. Does the Veeam set up you are talking about do automatic failover?

    Though if we have the disks space available to store all the data files on the second server, it occurs to me it might as well act as a DFSR replica server. Though I suppose we could use slower, cheaper disks if it was only to be used in emergencies.

  17. #88
    zag
    zag is offline
    zag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,829
    Thank Post
    918
    Thanked 422 Times in 355 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    88
    Quote Originally Posted by Jollity View Post
    It is a fair question, and I will think more about the alternative.

    A significant reason is perhaps that this is what we do currently. It has the advantage of also splitting the load, but I do not really know that this is necessary. It means no technician action is required if one server goes down, though there is a slowdown while the connections to the server that's down time out. Does the Veeam set up you are talking about do automatic failover?

    Though if we have the disks space available to store all the data files on the second server, it occurs to me it might as well act as a DFSR replica server. Though I suppose we could use slower, cheaper disks if it was only to be used in emergencies.
    Its not automatic, but this is how we do it and it doesnt take long to get the server back up and running.

    If you absolutely need 0% downtime then DFSR is the way forward, but in reality for a school a couple of hours downtime isn't the biggest problem in the world.

  18. Thanks to zag from:

    Jollity (24th February 2014)

  19. #89

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    217
    Thank Post
    260
    Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by seawolf View Post
    1. I would never use RAID5 except for backup storage as I find is too unreliable for primary storage. You didn't specify whether you planned to use a hot spare or not.
    I will read over the links you have sent this evening. I have read about the inadequacy of RAID 5 as redundancy due to the significant risk of another drive failing before the array can be rebuilt, but I was thinking it would be okay if used in conjunction with DFSR. If the array does fail completely we can rereplicate from the other server. But if there are other concerns as well over RAID5 that might change that.

    Quote Originally Posted by seawolf View Post
    NICs - how many total NICs will you have?
    I was going to go for the built in one + one extra. I am assuming they have two ports each, but will check. We might add in another NIC later, but there did not seem to be any point in putting any more at the moment as our network backbone is still only 1GBit.

    Quote Originally Posted by seawolf View Post
    I do question the need for the AV management server and AV update servers to be on their own separate servers. We combine those here.
    I was not clear. The AV Management server does updates as well. The other one is a fallback server that only does updates. Not totally sure that is necessary, or maybe I can combine it with another.

    Quote Originally Posted by seawolf View Post
    4. What do you plan to use for backup storage? This is the one place where RAID5 using good quality SATA drives (WD SE for instance) can be used relatively safely and save you a few dollars.
    I was leaving it for another post. But yes I was thinking RAID 5 of SATA drives. I am concerned about the RAID controller: I have been reading posts about issues with the Dell PERC H200 particularly with SATA.

  20. #90

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    217
    Thank Post
    260
    Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
    Rep Power
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by zag View Post
    Its not automatic, but this is how we do it and it doesnt take long to get the server back up and running.

    If you absolutely need 0% downtime then DFSR is the way forward, but in reality for a school a couple of hours downtime isn't the biggest problem in the world.
    True enough on the downtime. If the host for your file server would not boot, would you host the file server VM on the backup server?

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456789 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 11th March 2011, 11:29 AM
  2. Time to replace our old server, need advice
    By RallyTech in forum Hardware
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 29th June 2010, 10:49 PM
  3. Question Marks When moving Edugeek Joomla to the main server
    By FN-GM in forum EduGeek Joomla 1.0 Package
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 3rd July 2008, 09:23 PM
  4. Best way / method to sync time between servers.
    By mac_shinobi in forum Wireless Networks
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27th September 2005, 01:40 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •