+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 33 of 33
Thin Client and Virtual Machines Thread, Anyone using vSphere for their servers in a school? in Technical; Originally Posted by bossman Web server, Media Streaming etc etc where fast read is required and no writeback needed. which ...
  1. #31
    mrbios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Stroud, Gloucestershire
    Posts
    2,330
    Thank Post
    327
    Thanked 233 Times in 192 Posts
    Rep Power
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by bossman View Post
    Web server, Media Streaming etc etc where fast read is required and no writeback needed.



    which negatives? and which positives? are you talking about please explain?

    Please don't make statements when you don't back them up with information regarding what you are talking about.

    You may have had issues with Raid0 but have been using it for the past 11 years for the likes of above and have not met with any problems as long as we have a good VM backup its not a problem and as I have stated when we get another SAN to replicate in a mirror we should have total failsafe.

    We as a middle sized secondary school cannot afford to lash out vast finances on HW so we have to do the best we can with what we have and I think I have fulfilled that criteris to date.

    Only had 5 hours of non managed downtime in 11 years which I feel is not bad for a system which over the years TOC has been less than 250,000 and still going strong.

    I would love to spend 100,000 per annum, lucky if I get 15,000 to run all the school systems and toners come out of this for all the ICTsuites.

    It has been a labour of love and as this is my first and probably my last job in IT within the educational system I feel I have given the students the very best value for the money I have been given.
    Very defensive stance towards an opinion...

    My point though was that anything held on that raid, if the array dies, you lose the lot there and then, meaning you have to go through the process of replacing the dead drive, rebuilding the array before you can think of recovering the lost data. Just one extra drive and RAID5 and you (hopefully) never have to worry about all the time you'd lose from doing the rebuild etc. It's the cost of the single extra drive vs the cost of the amount of time it takes you to rebuild and restore.

    You're then talking about getting another SAN to mirror followed by talking about not having enough money to spend on the system? One drive = failover if an array dies, a FAR more likely occourance than the entire SAN dieing. (not that I think it's a bad idea to have two SANs mirroring each other, just questioning your logic over lack of funds and failover) Also may be worth pointing out that RAID5 with 3 disks vs RAID0 with 2 disks give you identical speed benefits for reads, you just lose the write benefit of RAID0.

  2. #32

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bournemouth
    Posts
    280
    Thank Post
    16
    Thanked 74 Times in 64 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    I completely agree with mrbios, no offense intended here but the main negative with Raid 0 is it has absolutely no redundancy, so when a disk fails your webserver/media streaming etc will be down while you replace the disk, rebuild the array and restore a backup.

    For the cost of one extra disk you can negate that downtime with a 3 disk raid 5, and since you mentioned that you use raid 0 for applications where there is no write, and high performance read is required, raid 5 is essentially raid 0 with parity so although write will be slower, with a highly read-biased environment, a 3 disk raid 5 on a decent controller will outperform a 2 disk raid 0 anyway (not equal it as mrbios stated, because the parity is distributed across all disks and so is the data, unlike raid 3/4). Adding spindles to any raid is the primary way of increasing performance.

    Also, a 2 disk raid 0 has approx double the chance of failing in a given period of time than a single disk.

    Basically you should use Raid 5 or 6 for predominantly read based applications such as web servers and streaming servers or file severs in general, and raid 1 or 10 for applications where write performance is important, such as databases. Obviously you can use raid 50/60 etc for added redundancy/performance but as a basic guideline I cant see any justification for ever using Raid 0 in a production environment.

    Even if you can't afford a 3rd disk, on a decent controller, a Raid 1 array would perform better read performance than a single disk, since both disks can perform seperate reads simultaneously.
    Last edited by ChrisMiles; 21st November 2012 at 01:10 PM.

  3. #33
    Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,014
    Thank Post
    300
    Thanked 172 Times in 158 Posts
    Rep Power
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by bossman View Post
    which negatives? and which positives? are you talking about please explain?

    Please don't make statements when you don't back them up with information regarding what you are talking about.
    I think the concern is that RAID0 isn't technically RAID as it fails the 'redundant' part. Most people who want speed use RAID10 (or 0+1) as that gives you the speed of RAID0 with the redundancy of RAID1 (give or take, I know it's not quite that simple as there are overheads). If you've got failover then fair enough, but doesn't having to failover your whole disk pool due to a single disk failure seem a bit excessive?

    To each their own though, and if it's working for you then I'm certainly not criticising.

    Chris

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Anyone using ipads for students. Maybe in a trolley or storage unit?
    By reggiep in forum Netbooks, PDA and Phones
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 4th April 2012, 05:30 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24th November 2011, 04:16 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 4th February 2011, 09:42 AM
  4. Has anyone used ophcrack on a server?
    By dolmandj in forum Network and Classroom Management
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24th March 2009, 10:17 AM
  5. Anyone using e107 for a school web site?
    By Ric_ in forum Web Development
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 1st February 2007, 08:12 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •