South West Grid for Learning (SWGfL) Thread, SWGfL Internet connections in Regional Broadband Consortiums (RBC); proxy for updates has been around for a while but it is only for windows updates....
6th November 2008, 10:44 AM #16
proxy for updates has been around for a while but it is only for windows updates.
6th November 2008, 10:53 AM #17
We had fun and games a few weeks back with the mail feed to our Exchange server. Packets were randomly being dropped before reaching the mx at the grid. This has been a very bad year for SWGFL connection reliability. We likewise are also looking at other options. Who's going to the meeting on 3rd Dec in Tiverton?? Another grilling in order for them??
Edit We also had the "no connection" problem when our hub school died, the day it came back on we got the bill! (thankfully they nulled it for this year)
6th November 2008, 11:00 AM #18
Has anyone out there succesfully integrated a standard broadband package into there school (for backup purposes)? Or found someone else to use instead of swgfl.
6th November 2008, 11:24 AM #19
Personally, no but it shoudnt be too difficult. At the end of the day, this is how corporates operate? The main concern for us would be meeting the regulations for filtering - but there are suggestions around the site on various solutions.... SmoothWall, Bloxx etc...
Im keen to find out more too - so anyone with experience, or knows someone who has, info please!! How do independant schools get their connection?
6th November 2008, 11:27 AM #20
As far as I know, contracts that schools and LEAs sign with SWGfL specify that you aren't allowed to install a second, non SWGfL line...
6th November 2008, 11:36 AM #21
- Rep Power
Tried the staffproxy route- can't see my users being too enamoured with having to go to login.staffproxy and remembering another user name and password to put in. Anyway to automate it?
Is the unfiltered proxy really going away? Seems like they have been talking about that for at least a year or two now?
6th November 2008, 11:49 AM #22
Yep - unfiltered is definately going byebye. We've (my techs) have been using StaffProxy for about 6 months. It has its niggles - more so at the moment! UpdateProxy goes on the blick too everynow and then.
6th November 2008, 12:34 PM #23
Originally Posted by philjones2000
I'm intrigued by the suggestion of a contractual restriction to only the SWGfL link - what about the (seemingly very sensible) installation of a backup Internet link via another ISP? Maybe with a Watchguard or similar device to control fail-over?
6th November 2008, 01:06 PM #24
From what i've been told (and has been mentioned on here a few times), you are allowed a backup link, but that link must be with the SWGfL also.
Originally Posted by sdc
6th November 2008, 01:07 PM #25
- Rep Power
Incandescent with rage
I think WE ALL need to make it clear the staff proxy and update proxy is not the way to go. The update proxy only has MS and SIMS and virus sites enabled, so any software that has automatic update will now fail, also we have no way of adding sites directly.
I rang SWGFL and Vivki Gardrener (Managed Service Manager) and asked for a list of sites available on the update proxy... still waiting. I was asked for a list of URLs i would like unblocked to allow updating of software, I tried to explain this is a none starter due to the sheer amount of different software.
If the staff proxy system used an inline url proxy username and password
e.g username.staffproxy.swgfl.org.uk then I could at least update non standard software and do my job more effectively (I do understand this is less secure).
If you are unhappy about the unfiltered proxy and the way it was switched off with no warning (well muttered about two years ago).
Please contact Vivki Gardrener (Managed Service Manager SWGFL)firstname.lastname@example.org or phone 01392 381371
3 Thanks to atfnet:
bgarston (6th November 2008), sdc (6th November 2008), TheScarfedOne (6th November 2008)
6th November 2008, 01:11 PM #26
Can we start some form of petition?
Originally Posted by atfnet
6th November 2008, 01:13 PM #27
- Rep Power
6th November 2008, 01:16 PM #28
- Rep Power
SWGFL have turned off our unfiltered proxy!!!
We have just realised that SWGFL have turned off the unfiltered proxy.
After calling their tech support they told us the new way of accessing the Internet would be by setting users and passwords up on a SWGLF Web App. Yes, thats a big step forward,- forget about AD itntegration, and who wanted policies based upon years groups or classes anyway?
Well fine, but what about all the schools that realised years ago that the SWGLF web filtering was crap and invested into another system,-Dansgaurdian, Bloxx, Websence to name a few. These all have fantastic controls, granular policies, user auditing and scheduling controls. They also require pointing at an unfiltered upstream.
I cannot belive they can just switch something off without consultation. Surely just lookng at the logs would tell them how much traffic was using the unfiltered proxy upstream, and that turing it off without warning would create a backlash?
It seems i am not alone, the tech support guy said he had been on the recieiving end of quite a few irate calls, which is a shame because it certainly would be someone with much less common sense that made such a decision.
Last edited by steele_uk; 6th November 2008 at 01:44 PM.
6th November 2008, 01:34 PM #29
- Rep Power
It was caused by one school who had pupils using the unfiltered feed. Not sure which.
6th November 2008, 01:36 PM #30
- Rep Power
Is there no possibility of moving away?
I'm absolutely amazed that the plug was pulled like this with no date given. How am I meant to create 200 staff user names and show them the daft login system with no warning.
By localzuk in forum General Chat
Last Post: 23rd February 2009, 03:15 PM
By mrbios in forum Wireless Networks
Last Post: 18th August 2007, 01:30 PM
By 20RickY06 in forum General Chat
Last Post: 6th September 2006, 09:56 AM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)