Our Advertisers Thread, Quote for new file server in Purchasing and Trading; Hi
Can anyone give me a quote for a new file server? The main requirement is that it must support ...
-
26th October 2009, 11:37 AM #1 Quote for new file server
Hi
Can anyone give me a quote for a new file server? The main requirement is that it must support 6 SATA drives; 2 RAID 1 for OS, with 4 RAID 5 for data. A single processor with 4 GB RAM would be good. For the data drives something around 1 TB each.
I've had a quick go at configuring using the Dell website and they want £340 per 1 TB SATA drive; which seems pretty expensive.
Many thanks for taking the time to read and respond.
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
26th October 2009, 11:39 AM #2 They won't be SATA at that price they would be SAS. A much better and faster drive. Google it for more info
-
-
26th October 2009, 11:40 AM #3 
Originally Posted by
altecsole
Hi
Can anyone give me a quote for a new file server? The main requirement is that it must support 6 SATA drives; 2 RAID 1 for OS, with 4 RAID 5 for data. A single processor with 4 GB RAM would be good. For the data drives something around 1 TB each.
I've had a quick go at configuring using the Dell website and they want £340 per 1 TB SATA drive; which seems pretty expensive.
Many thanks for taking the time to read and respond.
will get straight onto this for you Altecsole , could you pm me your details for the quote
-
-
26th October 2009, 11:59 AM #4 
Originally Posted by
FN-GM
They won't be SATA at that price they would be SAS. A much better and faster drive. Google it for more info
Thanks. I'm already aware of SAS, we have them in our Terminal server. The price is definitely for 1TB SATA.
-
-
26th October 2009, 01:22 PM #5 odd, for a file server i would go SAS anyway
-
-
26th October 2009, 01:38 PM #6 Network fileserver isn't going to need as fast disk access so for a fileserver I would go for SATA, for something that needs fast disk access such as a database(driven) server, virtual machine host then have SAS.
-
-
26th October 2009, 03:20 PM #7 
Originally Posted by
FN-GM
odd, for a file server i would go SAS anyway
Why? Unless you give reasons your responses aren't helpful. Saying 'Google it' doesn't help either.
-
-
26th October 2009, 03:39 PM #8 
Originally Posted by
FN-GM
odd, for a file server i would go SAS anyway
I suppose if money is no object, then it wouldn't hurt...
-
-
26th October 2009, 03:42 PM #9 ... or go for hybrid storage using SSD and SATA from Sun
-
-
26th October 2009, 09:14 PM #10 SAS are much faster, we use them because when you have 500 users writing to them it would prove better. - We have 800 clients so say 200 free, although allot of the time all IT rooms are in full use. I have also found them to be more reliable. They are also cheaper than SCSI
We the google bit. I replied on my iPhone and it isnt easy typing on there so it would save me lots of time.
-
-
26th October 2009, 09:57 PM #11 @FN-GM: I doubt that your hard disks are the bottleneck in that system (unless you have a massive aggregated link into your server).
-
-
26th October 2009, 11:03 PM #12 They seemed to improve this 18 month ago
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By alan-d in forum Our Advertisers
Replies: 4
Last Post: 14th May 2009, 01:04 PM
-
By kylewilliamson in forum Our Advertisers
Replies: 3
Last Post: 9th March 2009, 10:58 PM
-
By nephilim in forum Our Advertisers
Replies: 4
Last Post: 2nd March 2009, 05:15 PM
-
By Jobos in forum Hardware
Replies: 12
Last Post: 13th March 2008, 06:03 PM
-
By nicholab in forum Hardware
Replies: 15
Last Post: 4th October 2007, 08:01 AM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules