Our Advertisers Thread, The Great Computer Products Ltd Halloween GIVE AWAY! in Purchasing and Trading; Dam away all Christmas, might miss it. I will send my entry early then its at the top of the ...
-
2nd November 2009, 05:58 PM #61 Dam away all Christmas, might miss it. I will send my entry early then its at the top of the pile
-
-
IDG Tech News
-
3rd November 2009, 07:28 AM #62 
Originally Posted by
FN-GM
Blast i never win anything!
Well cone Boon.
When is the next comp?
Makes 2 of us, I've got more chance of catching a cold lol
Will keep an eye or two out for the chrimbo one
-
-
4th November 2009, 03:07 PM #63
-
-
9th November 2009, 11:42 PM #64
- Rep Power
- 10
well i finally got a 2.5 to 3.5 tray for the drive and installed W7x64 and although it seems snappier the WEI is no different from the F1 320gb i had it installed on, 5.9 is the lowest score 
Q9550 - 7.3
Cosair Dominator 4gb - 7.3
ATI 4870 512mb - 6.6 /6.6
SSD - 5.9
-
-
10th November 2009, 12:22 AM #65 Well Done Boon!
See Simon told you i never win anything
muhaha! i'll give the xmas one a shot me thinks... maybe santa will bring me more luck
James.
-
-
10th November 2009, 08:00 AM #66 
Originally Posted by
Boon72
well i finally got a 2.5 to 3.5 tray for the drive and installed W7x64 and although it seems snappier the WEI is no different from the F1 320gb i had it installed on, 5.9 is the lowest score
Q9550 - 7.3
Cosair Dominator 4gb - 7.3
ATI 4870 512mb - 6.6 /6.6
SSD - 5.9
Maybe sell that one and put the dosh towards an intel X25 SSD
-
-
10th November 2009, 08:05 AM #67 
Originally Posted by
Boon72
well i finally got a 2.5 to 3.5 tray for the drive and installed W7x64 and although it seems snappier the WEI is no different from the F1 320gb i had it installed on, 5.9 is the lowest score
Q9550 - 7.3
Cosair Dominator 4gb - 7.3
ATI 4870 512mb - 6.6 /6.6
SSD - 5.9
You can't just take that score as a benchmark. SSD's are faster in some areas - for example random read operations (on a hard disk, this will make the head move all over the place, on an SSD there's no head
). So, fragmentation is also a non-issue. It will also make the pagefile/paging process faster.
So, whilst it might not have the blazing speeds of an X-25, it will still speed up quite a lot of activities.
-
-
10th November 2009, 08:14 AM #68 
Originally Posted by
localzuk
You can't just take that score as a benchmark. SSD's are faster in some areas - for example random read operations (on a hard disk, this will make the head move all over the place, on an SSD there's no head

). So, fragmentation is also a non-issue. It will also make the pagefile/paging process faster.
So, whilst it might not have the blazing speeds of an X-25, it will still speed up quite a lot of activities.
True - but I thought the windows 7 test did do the random read and writes as per Arthurs posts on another thread.
The other option is to buy another SSD and put it into a RAID 0 Config
-
-
10th November 2009, 08:22 AM #69 Or just be happy with a free SSD and be grateful? 
LoL
-
2 Thanks to apoth0r:
mac_shinobi (10th November 2009), sparkeh (10th November 2009)
-
10th November 2009, 08:22 AM #70 
Originally Posted by
mac_shinobi
True - but I thought the windows 7 test did do the random read and writes as per Arthurs posts on another thread.
The other option is to buy another SSD and put it into a RAID 0 Config
Ah, but the thing about the 'single number' benchmark that windows gives it that it tells you about the slowest thing the device did. So, whilst that number may be saying 'this is a slow disk', it doesn't tell you that it may be quicker than others in certain areas. Doing a proper benchmark would be better - PCMark for example.
-
-
10th November 2009, 09:01 AM #71 
Originally Posted by
localzuk
Ah, but the thing about the 'single number' benchmark that windows gives it that it tells you about the slowest thing the device did. So, whilst that number may be saying 'this is a slow disk', it doesn't tell you that it may be quicker than others in certain areas. Doing a proper benchmark would be better - PCMark for example.
This really bugs me about the Windows tests. Its a bit like taking the British Olympic team, putting me in the 100m and saying we are terrible just because I finished last. Or something...
-
-
10th November 2009, 09:15 AM #72 
Originally Posted by
localzuk
Ah, but the thing about the 'single number' benchmark that windows gives it that it tells you about the slowest thing the device did. So, whilst that number may be saying 'this is a slow disk', it doesn't tell you that it may be quicker than others in certain areas. Doing a proper benchmark would be better - PCMark for example.
or HDTach 
HdTach
Or possibly Burn In Test
http://www.passmark.com/products/bit.htm
@ Ap0ther - there is always that - at least boon actually got an SSD unlike someone here lol
edit
surely it would of been better for hdtach or similiar bench marking software to use an iso and burn the iso to a disc and boot into its own enviroment and do the tests that way as apposed to running the software on top of windows that no doubt accesses or trys to use the hardware in the process.
Last edited by mac_shinobi; 10th November 2009 at 09:20 AM.
-
-
10th November 2009, 09:17 AM #73 
Originally Posted by
sparkeh
This really bugs me about the Windows tests. Its a bit like taking the British Olympic team, putting me in the 100m and saying we are terrible just because I finished last. Or something...
Yeah they could do a pink lane specially for you and see how fast the british olympic team really are lol
-
SHARE: 
Similar Threads
-
By CPLTD in forum General Chat
Replies: 19
Last Post: 17th August 2009, 04:54 PM
-
By CPLTD in forum Our Advertisers
Replies: 2
Last Post: 5th February 2009, 09:14 AM
-
By CPLTD in forum Our Advertisers
Replies: 8
Last Post: 8th November 2008, 03:16 PM
-
By Dos_Box in forum Our Advertisers
Replies: 5
Last Post: 9th May 2008, 01:55 PM
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules