+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 67
Other Stuff Thread, Do we have any photographers? in Fun Stuff; I'm really interested in getting into photography as a hobby. Have got a pretty decent Canon Ixus, but would really ...
  1. #1

    Little-Miss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    5,353
    Thank Post
    2,330
    Thanked 623 Times in 419 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    508

    Do we have any photographers?

    I'm really interested in getting into photography as a hobby.

    Have got a pretty decent Canon Ixus, but would really like a DSLR. Does anybody have any advice or can recommend a good camera for a beginner. I might ask Santa to get me one
    Last edited by Little-Miss; 20th October 2008 at 10:41 PM.

  2. #2

    powdarrmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Alcester, Warwickshire
    Posts
    4,855
    Thank Post
    412
    Thanked 777 Times in 650 Posts
    Rep Power
    181
    I learned my craft on a Canon EOS 350D, but I'm not sure if it's still available. Its bigger brothers are the 400D and 450D.

  3. #3

    beeswax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,284
    Thank Post
    285
    Thanked 225 Times in 153 Posts
    Rep Power
    130

  4. #4

    JJonas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    North Walsham, Norfolk
    Posts
    2,996
    Thank Post
    360
    Thanked 410 Times in 304 Posts
    Rep Power
    344
    I went for a Canon 400D and I am quite happy with it. A photographer friend advised me that if I was starting out from scratch go for a Canon as the lenses were cheaper than their Nikon equivalents.

  5. #5

    webman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    8,374
    Thank Post
    625
    Thanked 951 Times in 653 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    318
    Let use know what you go for in the end please

  6. #6

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,106
    Thank Post
    1,901
    Thanked 1,340 Times in 739 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    394
    As someone who started their working life as a photographer in a commercial studio, it's got to be Nikon everytime for a DSLR. If you can stretch to the lower middle range price wise you'll never look back. The lenses are superb too and VR (vibration reduction) is a must.

    I'd go for something like the D80.

  7. #7


    tom_newton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,448
    Thank Post
    865
    Thanked 839 Times in 662 Posts
    Rep Power
    194
    Another vote for Canon xxxD series - I have an ancient 300D which has served me well on 2 trips to africa. Probably the 350D is still available cheaply now it has been superceded by the 400 and 450, but it is still a great camera. See if you can make room in the budget for another lens tho - something like the canon 55-250IS would be a good place to start.

    Also:
    Camera Price Buster - UKs cheapest camera gear

  8. #8

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,106
    Thank Post
    1,901
    Thanked 1,340 Times in 739 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    394
    Canon cameras suck I'm afraid. A triumph of hype over substance. It's gotta be NIKON!

  9. #9
    Joedetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Walsall
    Posts
    1,316
    Thank Post
    6
    Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
    Rep Power
    21
    I'm no photographer but I do have a Sony Alpha 200. Nice little DSLR imho. I couldn't afford a NIKON so I call it a "poor man's nikon"

  10. #10

    SYSMAN_MK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,978
    Thank Post
    484
    Thanked 1,330 Times in 721 Posts
    Rep Power
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by tech_guy View Post
    Canon cameras suck I'm afraid. A triumph of hype over substance. It's gotta be NIKON!
    Wondered how long it would take for the nikon fan boys to come out Canon vs Nikon is like PC vs Mac.

    Another vote for Canon. Got a 350D ant it takes some amazing images, even using the kit 18-55 lense.
    Last edited by SYSMAN_MK; 21st October 2008 at 09:12 AM.

  11. #11

    localzuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Minehead
    Posts
    17,096
    Thank Post
    511
    Thanked 2,310 Times in 1,786 Posts
    Blog Entries
    24
    Rep Power
    803
    Quote Originally Posted by tech_guy View Post
    Canon cameras suck I'm afraid. A triumph of hype over substance. It's gotta be NIKON!
    Completely 100% disagree. I've gone from a Canon FTb to a Canon F1 to a Canon 350D and all are superb. The build quality is brilliant, and featureset for the price is excellent.

    Lenses are cheaper than other brands, and for the average DSLR user you don't need anything more.

    Plus Canons are heavier - which I prefer.

  12. #12

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,106
    Thank Post
    1,901
    Thanked 1,340 Times in 739 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    394
    NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON NIKON



  13. #13


    tom_newton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    4,448
    Thank Post
    865
    Thanked 839 Times in 662 Posts
    Rep Power
    194
    I have used both. There are advantages to both. You will not notice these (one vs. t'other) unless you are really serious about one aspect of photography, in which case, you'll be able to make up your own mind (eg. the canon is supposed to be the superior system for landscape, nikon for sport).

    The *big* difference for me tho was the lenses available and the price. That's where to make your decision. One of the factors for me was Canon's "thrifty fifty" - the 50mm f1.8 for 60. You won't get near f1.8 for twice that price on nikon. OTOH, canon are only just catching up to Nikon's 18-250VR in terms of bang for buck. I also find that the canon 2nd-hand and 3rd-party lens market is better.

  14. #14

    tech_guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    That little bit in the middle of Little Old England
    Posts
    8,106
    Thank Post
    1,901
    Thanked 1,340 Times in 739 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Rep Power
    394
    Quote Originally Posted by tom_newton View Post
    I have used both. There are advantages to both. You will not notice these (one vs. t'other) unless you are really serious about one aspect of photography, in which case, you'll be able to make up your own mind (eg. the canon is supposed to be the superior system for landscape, nikon for sport).

    The *big* difference for me tho was the lenses available and the price. That's where to make your decision. One of the factors for me was Canon's "thrifty fifty" - the 50mm f1.8 for 60. You won't get near f1.8 for twice that price on nikon. OTOH, canon are only just catching up to Nikon's 18-250VR in terms of bang for buck. I also find that the canon 2nd-hand and 3rd-party lens market is better.
    I agree.

  15. #15

    beeswax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,284
    Thank Post
    285
    Thanked 225 Times in 153 Posts
    Rep Power
    130
    there's also this review

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •