Office Software Thread, Office 2010 or 2013? in Technical; Hi Everyone
We have just taken out an EES for Windows and Office Pro, and I am after advice from ...
10th September 2013, 02:57 PM #1
Office 2010 or 2013?
We have just taken out an EES for Windows and Office Pro, and I am after advice from you helpful folks as to whether I should upgrade from Office 2003 to Office 2010 or 2013.
Our admin staff are currently using 2010, so it would make some sense to set this as the standard across the school. Another point in favour of 2010 is that it seems easier to install and deploy. On the downloads link of 2013, the special instructions read, "Please Note: The Office Web Apps Server Setup Key is required for product installation." Looking into this further, it would appear that I would need to set up a virtual machine to run the Web Apps Server, as our main server is currently running SQL Server.
However, the Home User Program only offers Office 2013 for staff to purchase for their home computers. How different are the two systems and how difficult would it be for staff to switch between the two? Are there any major benefits to installing 2013 over 2010? Or, more to the point, is there an easier way of managing the installation and deployment of 2013 across the school?
Thanks in advance for your advice.
IDG Tech News
10th September 2013, 02:59 PM #2
You deploy Office 2010 and 2013 the same way.
We upgraded from 2010 to 2013 so the machines match the version of office offer in the HUP.
An office web apps server is not required.
Thanks to FN-GM from:
StevieM (10th September 2013)
10th September 2013, 03:05 PM #3
Thanks for that. I wonder why it's got that misleading message on the VLSC then? The very first paragraph reads:
But if you've been there and done that, that's good enough for me. Please Note: The Office Web Apps Server Setup Key is required for product installation. Web Apps are available under the x86 (32 bit) Operating System Type drop down. Please visit the Office Web Apps Resource Center for additional information.
10th September 2013, 03:06 PM #4
That statement used to exist on the 2010 option too. It is there because there is also a download for the Office Web Apps in the same place as the usual installable.
2 Thanks to localzuk:
StevieM (10th September 2013)
10th September 2013, 03:10 PM #5
Oh, ok. We've already got our school email with MS Live/365/Outlook whatever they're calling it now, so staff and pupils already have access to the cut down Web Apps.
10th September 2013, 07:51 PM #6
We've gone to 2013 this summer with no issues.
2003 > 2010
2003 > 2013
Is going to be a massive learning curve for both staff and students no matter which one you choose.
10th September 2013, 09:54 PM #7
Does SIMS.net support 2013 yet? It didn't when I looked before summer I don't think.
10th September 2013, 10:18 PM #8
Not officially until the Autumn 2013 upgrade, but it appears to work just fine. I haven't had any teachers complaining so far since starting back.
Originally Posted by localzuk
10th September 2013, 10:50 PM #9
This. As said it's going to be a learning curve either way so just go for 2013. Saves upgrading a year down the road and going tthrough all the headaches all over again.
Originally Posted by Arthur
We're on 2013 and we've had almost no complaints at all - unbelievable when you think about it!
10th September 2013, 11:47 PM #10
Whilst we have not had any problems with Office 2013 itself, we have had no end of issues with 3rd party apps that use Word as an editor!
Template issues, Macros and of course the actual application versions (Word14 I think).
If you have any form of Word/Excel integrated applications, you really do need to check that 2013 is actually supported before rolling it out everywhere.
In most cases it will be the 3rd Party software provider that needs to provide the compatibility update but many are dragging their heels in doing so.
Thanks to m25man from:
StevieM (11th September 2013)
11th September 2013, 11:12 AM #11
That's a REALLY good point. We use the Nelson Handwriting software, which uses macros to create the cursive element of the font. I had so many problems getting it to work on 2003 in the first place that it's bound to be an issue on an upgrade. I'll be sure to check that out on the test machine before I roll it out across the school.
Originally Posted by m25man
11th September 2013, 09:01 PM #12
Good point about Office 2013 compatibility with other software.
Our Sage BI package doesn't work with 2013.
11th September 2013, 10:49 PM #13
- Rep Power
The question now is will you go with Office 2013 32bit or 64bit??
11th September 2013, 11:10 PM #14
32bit in case you have software that has 32bit plugins.
13th September 2013, 02:12 PM #15
All our curriculum machines have a 32-bit OS, so I don't even have to consider that question.I've installed Office 2013 on my own laptop now and the Nelson Handwriting font works. It's even easier to enable the macros in 2013 so we're good to go on that one. The next step is to deploy it to a test machine on the domain and try different users with various privileges and network locations. Then, all being well, I'll roll it out across the school next week. I've got to say I really like it. As others have said, it will be a steep learning curve for staff and students (and a rewrite of ICT planning!), but I think the fact that staff can buy their own copy for £8.95 is a bit of a sweetener. Even if I get moaned at, we can't stay on Office 2003 forever.
By Janyo in forum General Chat
Last Post: 19th July 2013, 10:49 AM
By talksr in forum Office Software
Last Post: 21st May 2013, 01:10 PM
By speckytecky in forum Office Software
Last Post: 27th April 2013, 03:52 AM
By enjay in forum Office Software
Last Post: 7th February 2012, 05:50 PM
By Dos_Box in forum Office Software
Last Post: 2nd August 2010, 02:57 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Tags for this Thread