+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
O/S Deployment Thread, 0x80091007 - The hash value is not correct in Technical; After wrestling with SCCM trying to be Adobe CS3 Master Collection to deploy silently, I have finally got it working ...
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    0x80091007 - The hash value is not correct

    After wrestling with SCCM trying to be Adobe CS3 Master Collection to deploy silently, I have finally got it working from within the OS but when I included it as part of an OSD task it fails to install with error code 0x80091007 or "The hash value is not correct".

    The only fixes I have found from googling is to update the package in the DP, remove and re-add the package to the DP or completly remove the package from SCCM, re-create and re-add to the DP.

    None of these have worked.

    Does anybody have any ideas?

  2. #2

    Theblacksheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In a house.
    Posts
    1,964
    Thank Post
    139
    Thanked 291 Times in 211 Posts
    Rep Power
    193
    Quote Originally Posted by adamf View Post
    After wrestling with SCCM trying to be Adobe CS3 Master Collection to deploy silently, I have finally got it working from within the OS but when I included it as part of an OSD task it fails to install with error code 0x80091007 or "The hash value is not correct".

    The only fixes I have found from googling is to update the package in the DP, remove and re-add the package to the DP or completly remove the package from SCCM, re-create and re-add to the DP.

    None of these have worked.

    Does anybody have any ideas?
    Are you waiting for the package to be removed (check status) before readding it?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Yep. I waited until the package was removed and the re-added it.

  4. #4
    tarquel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Powys, Mid-Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,740
    Thank Post
    13
    Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
    Rep Power
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by adamf View Post
    Yep. I waited until the package was removed and the re-added it.
    Did u actually check that the directory on the DP(s) had gone? i.e. not just go by what SCCM was telling you.

    Have you queried the logs to see more detail on why its failing? either directly by using the F8 command line within the boot image [assuming u have enabled that] or by looking at the logs via the Advertisement of the OSD TS.

    Cheers

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Yep, checked to see if it had gone. This is what I am getting from the smsts.log

    <![LOG[Install Software failed, hr=0x80091007]LOG]!><time="11:14:04.142+000" date="03-21-2011" component="InstallSoftware" context="" type="3" thread="2680" file="main.cpp:374">
    <![LOG[Process completed with exit code 2148077575]LOG]!><time="11:14:04.204+000" date="03-21-2011" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="2600" file="commandline.cpp:1102">
    <![LOG[!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!]LOG]!><time="11:14:04.204+000" date="03-21-2011" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="2600" file="instruction.cxx:3010">
    <![LOG[Failed to run the action: Install Adobe CS3 Master Collection.
    The hash value is not correct. (Error: 80091007; Source: Windows)]LOG]!><time="11:14:04.220+000" date="03-21-2011" component="TSManager" context="" type="3" thread="2600" file="instruction.cxx:3101">

    I've just created a new task sequence in case something in that is not working.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    I created a new task and I am still getting the same error.

  7. #7

    Theblacksheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    In a house.
    Posts
    1,964
    Thank Post
    139
    Thanked 291 Times in 211 Posts
    Rep Power
    193
    Are the files downloaded locally and run from the client or run from the DP?

    running from the DP may prevent the files ending up mismatched when on client.


    The other trick is refrsh DP then immediatly update DP.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by Theblacksheep View Post
    Are the files downloaded locally and run from the client or run from the DP?

    running from the DP may prevent the files ending up mismatched when on client.


    The other trick is refrsh DP then immediatly update DP.
    Normally the content is downloaded, I am just about to try accessing it directly.

    I've already tried the refresh/update trick.

  9. #9
    oxide54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    798
    Thank Post
    51
    Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
    Rep Power
    23
    are you following distmgr.log on the server when you refresh?

    be careful opening the DP directory in windows explorer, it may create desktop.ini files or thumbnail files which then make the hash invalid.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    I've refreshed/updated the package and you can see this happening in the distmgr.log on the server - everything complete fine.

    When running the task and having the content accessed directly I am still getting the same error.

    Are there any logs on the server that contain the hash of the package so I can cross reference it when the hash in the smsts.log on the client?

  11. #11
    oxide54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    798
    Thank Post
    51
    Thanked 55 Times in 54 Posts
    Rep Power
    23
    have you checked this link?

    (iBoyd) » SCCM: Content downloaded to the client does not match the content specified in the content source

    Binary Differential Replication & Hidden files

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Just had a look run dir /s /a:h on the source directory that the files are copied from and there are no hidden files. Binary differential replication is not enabled on this package.

  13. #13
    tarquel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Powys, Mid-Wales, UK
    Posts
    1,740
    Thank Post
    13
    Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
    Rep Power
    30
    Just to get more info.... How are you deploying this as part of the OSD TS? via Collection Variables or via Install Software install in your TS? (or some other way)

    Are you running SCCM Natively or in Mixed Mode?

    Quite the puzzler tho...

    Also, is your DP the same or different server as your site server?

    Is BITS and associated services running correctly? I seem to recall that after a recent update - possibly R3 or some hotfixes - while everything was working correctly as far as current packages went, when i went to update them, things werent working as expected, for no apparent reason.

    Cant remember exactly what it was offhand, but I did have to remove the BITS Server Extensions (in the 2008 Features list) from the DP server (or might have been site server), reboot, install it again, reboot, and help / poke SCCM's services until things were working again.

    I did read that rarely, this can fail for no reason and something like the above is the cure, but take with a pinch of salt

    Nath

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Croydon
    Posts
    504
    Thank Post
    18
    Thanked 31 Times in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by tarquel View Post
    Just to get more info.... How are you deploying this as part of the OSD TS? via Collection Variables or via Install Software install in your TS? (or some other way)

    Are you running SCCM Natively or in Mixed Mode?

    Quite the puzzler tho...

    Also, is your DP the same or different server as your site server?

    Is BITS and associated services running correctly? I seem to recall that after a recent update - possibly R3 or some hotfixes - while everything was working correctly as far as current packages went, when i went to update them, things werent working as expected, for no apparent reason.

    Cant remember exactly what it was offhand, but I did have to remove the BITS Server Extensions (in the 2008 Features list) from the DP server (or might have been site server), reboot, install it again, reboot, and help / poke SCCM's services until things were working again.

    I did read that rarely, this can fail for no reason and something like the above is the cure, but take with a pinch of salt

    Nath
    We are deploying the packages using the "Install Software" part of the TS.

    SCCM is running in Mixed Mode

    The DP is on the same server as the site server

    BITS appears to be running correctly as I can download and install the problem package from within the OS after advertising it. It's only when it is part of the OSD TS that it causes a problem. I haven't installed R3 yet.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    12
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Rep Power
    0
    check the web server logs on the dp point for errors from that client. I've seen the appconfig in IIS cause some strangeness like this. I would expect all installs to fail though, not just osd ones.



SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 172
    Last Post: 13th June 2013, 02:02 PM
  2. File blocking based on a hash value
    By phodge in forum Windows
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 30th March 2010, 04:11 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11th June 2009, 03:23 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 5th February 2009, 10:55 PM
  5. HASH Rules
    By bigb3n in forum Windows
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29th October 2007, 02:20 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •