+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
O/S Deployment Thread, PXE for some computers in Technical; Odd one which seems to manifest itself with new computers. PXE boot isn't working so I can shove out images. ...
  1. #1

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,880
    Thank Post
    575
    Thanked 998 Times in 770 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    461

    PXE for some computers

    Odd one which seems to manifest itself with new computers.

    PXE boot isn't working so I can shove out images.
    It's fine for the majority of our machines, the old AMD kit, some new Intel kit, but on some machines, nada.
    Picks up DHCP fine. Hits the "looking for policy" then get PXE Aborted or whatever the specific message is. No F12 prompt or anything.

    So clearly the server side of it is fine. Boot images distributed as necessary. Works OK for the majority just not for the very few (Same cable, network point etc as I'm testing them here)

    SCCM 2012 R2 on Server 2012. No DHCP options as that's not recommended anyway, just ip helpers. Moot anyway as it appears to be machine based. Maybe related to uefi?

    SMSPXE log says "No advertisements found".
    Last edited by synaesthesia; 26th November 2013 at 02:18 PM.

  2. #2

    FN-GM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    15,839
    Thank Post
    876
    Thanked 1,677 Times in 1,459 Posts
    Blog Entries
    12
    Rep Power
    444
    Are you using IP Helpers?

    I have had issues where machines cannot find a policy, it turned out that the time and date in the BIOS was incorrect. Do you get into PE at all?

  3. #3

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,880
    Thank Post
    575
    Thanked 998 Times in 770 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    461
    No, after "Contacting Server" it gets PXE Boot Aborted and carries onto another boot method if available.
    Yes using IP helpers. Not sure networking would/should be an issue as it works for other machines. Regardless, I tried using option 66/67 and removing the helpers which worked identically (didn't for the new machine, did for various others)

    Using the various methods of searching for incumbent MAC addresses (collection queries, monitoring query) there's nothing stating this machine is present, yet the log suggests it is in the database somewhere.
    Confused.

  4. #4
    free780's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    911
    Thank Post
    41
    Thanked 69 Times in 66 Posts
    Rep Power
    18
    Is the ts deployed to unknown or a diffrrent device collection? If so os the pc in the collection? Does sccm believe the image has been deployed?

  5. #5

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,880
    Thank Post
    575
    Thanked 998 Times in 770 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    461
    No it doesn't believe that. SCCM believes the machine already exists.
    I've just popped an intel NIC in to see if that does anything, and annoyingly it also states the device exists. It absolutely definitely does not!
    The deployment is out to all unknown computers.

    ***

    Client lookup reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="16777648" ServerName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification></ClientIDReply>

    00:0E:0C:58:67:2A, 03000200-0400-0500-0006-000700080009: device is in the database.

    Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="16777648" ServerName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction LastPXEAdvertisementID="" LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="" OfferIDTime="" PkgID="" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="" BootImageID="" Mandatory=""/></ClientIDReply>

    00:0E:0C:58:67:2A, 03000200-0400-0500-0006-000700080009: no advertisements found

    00:0E:0C:58:67:2A, 03000200-0400-0500-0006-000700080009: No boot action. Aborted

    00:0E:0C:58:67:2A, 03000200-0400-0500-0006-000700080009: Not serviced.

    Another edit: Machine GUID (03000...) is the same regardless of the NIC. However it also appears to be shared with several machines...
    Last edited by synaesthesia; 26th November 2013 at 03:17 PM.

  6. #6

    synaesthesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northamptonshire
    Posts
    5,880
    Thank Post
    575
    Thanked 998 Times in 770 Posts
    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    461
    Right, nailed it after a bit of digging.

    My suspicion on the GUID was correct. It appears some manufacturers like GIGABYTE are lazy gits and don't correctly flash their BIOS - hence you get whole ranges of boards with the same SMGUID.
    One flash of the BIOS later and we now have a correct, unique SMGUID and a machine which happily PXE boots.

    The following query should help anyone in the same boat (searches for duplicate SMGUIDs)

    Code:
    select * from sms_g_system_SYSTEM INNER JOIN sms_gh_system_SYSTEM on sms_g_system_SYSTEM.ResourceId = sms_gh_system_SYSTEM.ResourceId where sms_g_system_SYSTEM.Name <> sms_gh_system_SYSTEM.Name
    And the SQL query can be:
    select * from v_GS_System inner join v_HS_System on v_HS_System.ResourceID = v_GS_System.ResourceID where v_GS_System.Name0 <> v_HS_System.Name0

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. EPortal logon fails for some users
    By robk in forum MIS Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30th October 2007, 10:06 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 7th September 2007, 02:16 PM
  3. VBS script for prestaging computers anyone?
    By ChrisH in forum Scripts
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 23rd June 2006, 09:59 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 14th June 2006, 05:57 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16th February 2006, 09:57 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •