+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
*nix Thread, 4 reasons to dump Linux in Technical; ...
  1. #1

    Geoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Fylde, Lancs, UK.
    Posts
    11,804
    Thank Post
    110
    Thanked 583 Times in 504 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    224

    4 reasons to dump Linux

    Thanks to PC World for this one:

    http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2074985,00.asp

    Okay, so I love Linux, but maybe when you think about switching from XP, you should consider Vista. Here are my top four reasons you should move to Vista instead of Linux.

    Reason number one: Linux is boring. When I run Linux, I don't have the excitement of wondering whether an e-mail, IM, or Web page is going to give my system the latest worm or virus. Where's the fun in that? I know Microsoft promises Vista represents significant and noticeable changes to the operating system, locking it down in the interest of security . . . Oh, wait, I'm quoting from a 2003 story about XP SP2. Silly me.

    I'm sure Microsoft will turn in a secure OS this time. Just look at Internet ÂExplorer 7—it's much more secure! It took almost a whole day before the security company Secunia found that a hacker could trick IE7 into showing malicious content by spoofing a pop-up window opened on a trusted site.

    I know some of you think that the only reason Windows gets all the neat malware is because it's so popular. Why would anyone attack Linux? Just because 60 percent of the world's 100 million Web sites run Linux, that's no reason to try to crack Linux. No, it's not that Windows has historically been as secure as a papier-mâché fortress; it must be because Linux just isn't very popular.

    Reason number two: Linux is a pain to set up. With Linux, you need to put in a CD or DVD, hit the enter button, give your computer a name, and enter a password for the administrator account. Heck, you could break a nail that way! Almost all early customers of Vista will need to redeem their upgrade coupons and then replace their new PC's XP with Vista. That'll be loads of fun.

    Reason number three: Linux is expensive. Linux is often free, but look at all that time you spend setting it up. Most people will end up buying new PCs with Vista preinstalled. Doesn't everyone and every business have the money to buy new systems? Why, just now I went over to Dell and priced out an OptiPlex 745 minitower with a 1.8-GHz Duo, a DVD±RW and 48X CD-ROM SATA drive, an 80GB SATA hard drive and 2GB of RAM, and a 256MB ATI Radeon X1300 Pro graphics card for an "enhanced Vista Experience." It'll run me only $1,375. Of course, I won't get a keyboard, mouse, or monitor at that price.

    With Linux, unless I buy one of those less-than-$1,000 boxes with the OS preinstalled, I have to set it up myself! It took me at least half an hour to set up Linux on a 2.8-GHz Pentium IV PC with 512MB of RAM, a 60GB Ultra ATA/100 hard drive, and an nVidia GeForce4 MX 440 AGP graphics board with 64MB of DDR memory. That system cost me $499.

    Reason number four: Linux doesn't have enough apps. Most Linux systems come only with secure Web browsers, like Firefox 2.0; e-mail clients, like Evolution 2.6 and Thunderbird 2.0; IM clients, like Gaim 1.5; office suites, like OpenÂOffice.org 2.0.4; and so on. By my count, my copy of SUSE Linux has only more than 100 apps. Microsoft gives you Internet Explorer and Outlook ÂExpress, the most popular Web browser and e-mail client around...even though they do have a few teeny-weeny security problems. Microsoft also has Office, which . . . oh, wait: You don't get that with Vista, do you?

    Just because some apps such as the Juniper Networks' Odyssey wireless LAN client WLAN, Cisco Systems' VPN client, and Norton AntiVirus 10 don't work right with Vista is no reason to think many of your current apps either won't work or will need to be upgraded.

    Still, as long as you want to run Microsoft programs at Microsoft prices, Windows is the OS for you! If you really think about it, you can find lots of reasons to run Vista instead of Linux. There just aren't any good ones.

  2. #2
    tickmike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    South Derbyshire. U.K.
    Posts
    367
    Thank Post
    5
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    Nice one Geoff.

  3. #3
    daveyboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bath / Bristol
    Posts
    279
    Thank Post
    37
    Thanked 19 Times in 17 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    Thought this might make you smile

  4. #4

    mattx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,240
    Thank Post
    1,058
    Thanked 1,068 Times in 625 Posts
    Rep Power
    740

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    My next upgrade:



    Beat that !!! 8O

  5. #5
    Quackers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,320
    Thank Post
    40
    Thanked 142 Times in 117 Posts
    Rep Power
    53

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    I thought it was real with an opening statement like "Linux is boring" until i read a little more.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3
    Thank Post
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    I've always been a strong hater of anything Linux after I had a job setting up mail and file servers from some hideous command line that used to take about 2 days to get working.
    But I'm genuinely interested in how an open source os can possibly be secure ?.

  7. #7


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    8,202
    Thank Post
    442
    Thanked 1,032 Times in 812 Posts
    Rep Power
    339

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    lol, it can be a steep learning curve sometimes I gues you were playing sendmail. Once set-up the benefits of low maintenance outway the initial cost.
    I wouldn't say the command shell is hiddeous - it is an order of magnitude better than windows CLI.

    The security is better because: 1) There are more developers to watch over the code 2) patches are introduced more quickly 3) evil hackers tend not to target OSS applications - there are currently zero worms/trojans in the wild. 3) it's less mainstream, therefore less target ordinance 4)Linux is built on multiuser unix operating systems - this was an afterthought for NT 5) most things are configured 'off' by default -but this is changing in windows 6) MS traditionally has poor regard for security and products are rushed out. 7) it's in MS business interest that people 'upgrade'

    I suspect there are other reasons

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,319
    Thank Post
    101
    Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    Quote Originally Posted by Quackers
    I thought it was real with an opening statement like "Linux is boring" until i read a little more.
    I knew it was fake before I read it because it was Geoff who posted it. The person who converts Geoff from Linux... well, doesn't exist.

  9. #9

    webman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    North East England
    Posts
    8,406
    Thank Post
    639
    Thanked 961 Times in 661 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    324

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    I agree entirely with CyberNerd, hit the nail on the head.

  10. #10
    mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,966
    Thank Post
    248
    Thanked 49 Times in 45 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    46

    Re: 4 reasons to dump Linux

    I thought this was informative from the author of KeePass - a Password Safe utility:

    Is it really free?
    Yes, KeePass is really free, and more than that: it is open-source (OSI certified). You can have a look at its full source and for example check if the encryption algorithms are implemented correctly.

    Perhaps you wonder why I decided to make it open-source. The answer is relatively simple: in my opinion all software that has something to do with security should be open-source. Here's a quote of Bruce Schneier that sums it up pretty good:

    "As a cryptography and computer security expert, I have never understood the current fuss about the open source software movement. In the cryptography world, we consider open source necessary for good security; we have for decades. Public security is always more secure than proprietary security. It's true for cryptographic algorithms, security protocols, and security source code. For us, open source isn't just a business model; it's smart engineering practice."
    Bruce Schneier, Crypto-Gram 1999/09/15

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Dead TFT monitors - repair or dump?
    By CESIL in forum Hardware
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 11th November 2009, 07:36 PM
  2. Oracle database dump
    By pooley in forum MIS Systems
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14th June 2007, 10:54 AM
  3. Top 11 Reasons you shouldn't upgrade to Internet Explorer 7
    By Geoff in forum Jokes/Interweb Things
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 29th October 2006, 12:33 PM
  4. Five reasons NOT to use Linux. :)
    By Geoff in forum *nix
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 31st August 2005, 07:38 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •