+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
*nix Thread, RedHat Vs SuSE (or any other distro!) in Technical; .... but mainly these two which would you prefer to run? i know most solutions use RH, but I prefer ...
  1. #1

    Gatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Thank Post
    Thanked 684 Times in 453 Posts
    Rep Power

    RedHat Vs SuSE (or any other distro!)

    .... but mainly these two

    which would you prefer to run?

    i know most solutions use RH, but I prefer SuSE (9.3 at moment)

    Curious to hear what you lot think... and what the pros/cons are on each side..

    one immediate Pro (IMHO) for SuSE is YaST - excellent for managing everything, and easy to use too.
    Then there is SaX for configuring X

    Con - they tend to re-write config file such as Apache2 - its a bloody mess now with all the includes and not very clear about which settings are meant to go where!!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Thank Post
    Thanked 1,032 Times in 812 Posts
    Rep Power

    Re: RedHat Vs SuSE (or any other distro!)

    I mostly use SuSE or Ubuntu for desktops and Centos (RHEL) or Debian for servers.

    I know what you mean about SuSE, and I miss apt/yum.

    I guess my Ideal system would have kde, yum, YasT, DirectX....

    if only

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Handsworth Grammar School
    Thank Post
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power

    Re: RedHat Vs SuSE (or any other distro!)

    RH (actually FC these days) for exactly the reason that you favour SuSE (ie YaST). I ran SuSE 8.0 for a year and amongst my gripes were :
    1 lack of fundamental modules. Take the Gimp for example; gimp-devel is not loaded by default, making compiling gimp plugins impossible. It seemed that everytime I wanted to load some new software, I had to load 47 dependencies, something that I hadn't had to do with RH.
    2 nonsense dependancies. I favour xcdroast over k3b, so I removed k3b from the SuSE system. Whenever I added new software, k3b came back. Another specific example was kbear - why run an ftp client if you aren't doing some ftp work?
    3 YaST - complete waste of time IMO. I remember I wanted to change the modem dial string. YaST had no way to change anything, so I wound up with two modems. Everytime I wanted to change something with YaST, I found it quicker to delete config and set it up again.

    The aforementioned SuSE system was originally running RH7.1 and we upgraded to SuSE 8.0. After a year, we went back to RH7.1 as it was a far superior distro. We then upgraded the box to FC3 and I'm guessing FC5 will be the next upgrade.

+ Post New Thread

Similar Threads

  1. ELGG on Novell SuSe 10.1
    By brubakes in forum *nix
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11th December 2007, 10:02 PM
  2. Installing VMware on SUSE 10.2
    By FN-GM in forum *nix
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 30th September 2007, 09:48 AM
  3. Compiler not working (Suse)
    By netadmin in forum *nix
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 8th July 2007, 12:30 AM
  4. SuSE 10.1 display frequency
    By marco84 in forum *nix
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 4th October 2006, 06:38 PM
  5. SUSE Email Server II
    By kingswood in forum *nix
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 8th September 2005, 10:51 AM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts