+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38
IT News Thread, The official Microsoft Windows 8 Engineering Blog in Other News; I personally view the whole change/feature are not as bad as some people make out, okay sometimes they are delayed ...
  1. #31

    EduTech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    4,882
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thank Post
    157
    Thanked 833 Times in 653 Posts
    Rep Power
    207
    I personally view the whole change/feature are not as bad as some people make out, okay sometimes they are delayed in introducing things that have been around for a while but maybe that is a view they take because they introuduce it at a point IT REALLY NEEDS TO BE THERE as oppose to throwing everything in and then having very limited new editions.. I dunno.

    The developers are not stupid, they all know what is around and what is available so they are quite known to the fact linux has dual desktops how many years ago etc. I think they just plan to implement it at a later date maybe when it is more common?

    I dunno..


    James.

  2. IDG Tech News
  3. #32


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,745
    Thank Post
    422
    Thanked 961 Times in 747 Posts
    Rep Power
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeroHour View Post
    Its OT but I think I may just have to build a Mint VM for a gander, never played with that distro yet. RedHat expensive for schools? never seen pricing at all thb.

    I think the server is about £175 p/a and the desktop around £30- but you are paying for the support rather than the product. MS charge extra for support. I've not used the RHEL desktop, but our file servers and webservers are RHEL (in an AD domain). There is a bunch more things that you can do on Samba for file sharing that windows servers can't cope with. Hopefully the'll fix these in server8 The redhat clustering suite also looks fantastic (free if you use centos) for high availability datacentre type stuff.

  4. #33

    ZeroHour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    5,821
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thank Post
    783
    Thanked 1,136 Times in 681 Posts
    Rep Power
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by CyberNerd View Post
    I think the server is about £175 p/a and the desktop around £30- but you are paying for the support rather than the product. MS charge extra for support. I've not used the RHEL desktop, but our file servers and webservers are RHEL (in an AD domain). There is a bunch more things that you can do on Samba for file sharing that windows servers can't cope with. Hopefully the'll fix these in server8 The redhat clustering suite also looks fantastic (free if you use centos) for high availability datacentre type stuff.
    I thought there was a base license cost for the OS and support was part? You cant get redhat without support can you?

  5. #34


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,745
    Thank Post
    422
    Thanked 961 Times in 747 Posts
    Rep Power
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeroHour View Post
    I thought there was a base license cost for the OS and support was part? You cant get redhat without support can you?
    no, essentially the base cost includes support. There are other options - Centos, Scientific Linux and Oracle are just re-builds of redhat. I'm not sure of Oracles pricing, probably more as it's aimed at really high end database stuff.

  6. #35

    ZeroHour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    5,821
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thank Post
    783
    Thanked 1,136 Times in 681 Posts
    Rep Power
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by CyberNerd View Post
    no, essentially the base cost includes support. There are other options - Centos, Scientific Linux and Oracle are just re-builds of redhat. I'm not sure of Oracles pricing, probably more as it's aimed at really high end database stuff.
    How does it work with renewals? if you dont renew do you have to stop using redhat or do you just get to keep that version but unsupported?

    Thanks for info, really am curious

  7. #36


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    7,745
    Thank Post
    422
    Thanked 961 Times in 747 Posts
    Rep Power
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by ZeroHour View Post
    How does it work with renewals? if you dont renew do you have to stop using redhat or do you just get to keep that version but unsupported?

    Thanks for info, really am curious
    When you sign in to RHN ( http://rhn.redhat.com ) you get a list of your machines, and their patch level - you can opt to patch them from there or log into each server and patch them (or do it automatically, but I prefer not to). If your entitlements run out then you don't get any updates, or access to their knowledge base - so yes you can keep using it, it's open source - you OWN it.

  8. #37
    apearce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Birmingham
    Posts
    378
    Thank Post
    33
    Thanked 158 Times in 93 Posts
    Rep Power
    37
    I wish I was going to Build as I think we'll be seeing a lot of Windows 8 and Windows 8 Server.
    Home - BUILD | September 13 - 16, 2011 | Anaheim Convention Center

    Anyone want to pay me to go? ;-)

  9. #38


    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    51.405546, -0.510212
    Posts
    5,891
    Thank Post
    180
    Thanked 1,785 Times in 1,328 Posts
    Rep Power
    466
    Bringing Hyper-V to "Windows 8"



    Hyper-V, Microsoft’s answer to VMware’s popular hypervisor, will continue to require 64-bit processors, as it always has, while adding new hardware virtualization requirements.

    Hyper-V requires a 64-bit system that has Second Level Address Translation (SLAT),” explains Hyper-V program manager Mathew John in Microsoft’s Windows 8 blog. “SLAT is a feature present in the current generation of 64-bit processors by Intel & AMD. You’ll also need a 64-bit version of Windows 8, and at least 4GB of RAM.”

    SLAT is a form of hardware virtualization that is included in newer versions of Intel and AMD processors, such as Intel’s Core i3, i5 and i7 processors and AMD’s Barcelona processors. Hyper-V always required some form of hardware virtualization, but this is more restrictive than the current specs.

    If the same requirement applies to the forthcoming Windows Server 8, then some machines capable of running Hyper-V today would not be able to run Hyper-V after upgrading. For example, Intel Core 2 machines meet Hyper-V’s current requirements, but do not contain the SLAT feature. (Source)
    Last edited by Arthur; 8th September 2011 at 12:28 AM.

SHARE:
+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25th February 2011, 08:03 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12th January 2011, 01:29 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 3rd May 2010, 07:04 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 20th April 2010, 05:02 PM
  5. Opinion: It's official, Apple is the new Microsoft
    By ZeroHour in forum General Chat
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 15th September 2007, 09:38 PM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •