IT News Thread, Microsoft To Be In Court Again Over Unfair Practices? in Other News; Link: Trend Micro raises a stink over Security Essentials via Windows Update...
5th November 2010, 02:17 PM #1
Microsoft To Be In Court Again Over Unfair Practices?
5th November 2010, 02:26 PM #2
As free anti virus solutions already exist and this software is optional, I don't really see how Trend Micro has a leg to stand on? I can fully understand why they're unhappy because it's doing them out of business, but surely that's just the way the world works?
5th November 2010, 02:36 PM #3
I thought they were trying to make a similar point to the one made about browsers. Internet Explorer is included in Windows but there are other [free] browsers out there. My preference is to not use Internet Explorer. However I guess the difference in this latest little spat is Security Essentials is free and [some of] the alternatives are not.
Originally Posted by LosOjos
5th November 2010, 02:48 PM #4
Plus, Internet Explorer was installed without confirmation when the dispute was made (hence the browser choice update), security essentials isn't...
Originally Posted by DaveP
6th November 2010, 04:43 AM #5
Typical, bad software trying to compete on a legal platform rather than a technology one.
Those that can, do. Those that can't, sue.
Just ask the Opera team about that.
6th November 2010, 06:10 AM #6
If the ComputerWorld article is correct, it would appear that Trend Micro can't even get their facts straight regarding MSE...
Trend Micro's response shows a poor understanding of the action Microsoft has taken. MSE is being offered not through Windows Update, but through the related Microsoft Update service
. Microsoft Update, which updates a broad range of Microsoft products and occasionally offers new ones, requires a deliberate opt-in: it isn't enabled by default
. Moreover, MSE will only be offered to customers who do not have an existing antivirus product installed
—and in any case is offered as an optional download
Though an antirust suit over an optional download that is only offered after enabling an optional feature seems unlikely, that competitors would even raise such concerns shows Microsoft's uniquely peculiar position in the industry. The third-party software vendors are more than happy to insist that Windows needs antivirus software and that using a Windows machine without such software is dangerous—but if Microsoft agrees with their assessment and tries to improve the situation itself, they threaten to cry foul. (Source
It's going to do them out of even more business now. If people didn't know about MSE, they certainly will now. I imagine Microsoft are really pleased - lots of free advertising for thier free anti-virus.
Originally Posted by LosOjos
Exactly. Trend Micro have a habit of doing this. They tried to kill off ClamAV a few years ago with bogus patent threats. It is pretty obvious they only care about making money, rather than producing better software. If MSE wasn't any good, would they still bother complaining?
Originally Posted by SYNACK
By Dos_Box in forum General Chat
Last Post: 17th August 2010, 10:24 PM
By laserblazer in forum General Chat
Last Post: 28th November 2009, 09:28 PM
By KWestos in forum General Chat
Last Post: 17th April 2009, 11:38 AM
By Paid_Peanuts in forum General Chat
Last Post: 19th September 2007, 12:13 PM
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)